Those atheists abound on this forum. Like I said, whenever an atheist invokes God and states what God does or does not do, they are referring to God. There is no get out of jail free card.
I guess we will just have to agree to disagree. Atheists want a free pass, they want to be able to say any damn thing about God and then they say no God exists. Tat is logically incoherent because a nonexistent entity cannot be responsible for anything.
No, that is not the reason. God needs no cheerleaders because God has no needs at all.
Only humans and other animals have needs.
The person who sets it of is to blame.
Thanks. My life has been one tragedy after another, and by all rights I should have lost my faith in God long, long ago, but I have sustained my faith with the help of friends like my bff
@Truthseeker.
However, some improvement might be on the way.
The argument that atheists make -- that God
can eliminate suffering so God
should eliminate suffering -- is logically incoherent.
This is what atheists do not understand. Atheists think omnipotent means that
God can do anything, which really means God should be doing everything they expect Him to do. They do not understand what omnipotence really means.
It means that God can do anything but God only does what God chooses to do.
“Say: O people! Let not this life and its deceits deceive you, for the world and all that is therein is held firmly in the grasp of His Will. He bestoweth His favor on whom He willeth, and from whom He willeth He taketh it away. He doth whatsoever He chooseth.” Gleanings, p. 209
Why should an omnipotent/omniscient God do what humans expect Him to do? How could any human know more than God regarding what is
best for humans?