mikkel_the_dane
My own religion
So here is one way to understand the idea of the whole as all that is going on.
All words as it stands right now requires a brain, an understanding in a brain and a referent.
For the different non-believers and believers some of them share a general belief.
Only that as independent of brains matter either as God or objective reality. The problem is that the referent of what matters as matters is not independent of brains.
Just as I can't point to God, I can't point to the whole as all that is going on as pointing outside of me, because some of it, is in me. Not all of it, but neither nothing.
How ever indirect they do it, they always in effect do the same. What really matters is independent of humans, but they can't show that it matters as independent of humans.
All words as it stands right now requires a brain, an understanding in a brain and a referent.
For the different non-believers and believers some of them share a general belief.
Only that as independent of brains matter either as God or objective reality. The problem is that the referent of what matters as matters is not independent of brains.
Just as I can't point to God, I can't point to the whole as all that is going on as pointing outside of me, because some of it, is in me. Not all of it, but neither nothing.
How ever indirect they do it, they always in effect do the same. What really matters is independent of humans, but they can't show that it matters as independent of humans.
Last edited: