Yes, there is not scientific basis for ID, because the assertions are based on belief, and believers worldwide reject the science,.
The above is unclear, since the problem is Christian and Muslims who support ID and various anti-science Creationist beliefs based on ancient beliefs and texts and not science.
Simple google search. You need to do your homework. There are more references that document this.
en.wikipedia.org
A 2000 study conducted by a researcher of the University of Oklahoma found that 19% of participants believed that Islam's tenets were not at odds with Darwin's theory of evolution while 81% believed there to be some form of conflict between Islam and
Darwinism.
[96] One of the participants, an Islamic teacher, stood in opposition to the theory of evolution although was willing to accept certain aspects that were proposed by it.
[97] The participants who believed there to be no conflict between Islam and Darwin's theory of evolution were split as it pertained to the possible relationship between primates and humans with only 6% of participants seeing no issue with the assertion.
[98]
As per a 2008 report,
evolutionary biology was included in the high-school curricula of most Muslim countries. Science foundations of 14 Muslim countries, including
Pakistan,
Iran,
Turkey,
Indonesia, and
Egypt, recently signed a statement by the Interacademy Panel (IAP, a global network of science academies), in support of the teaching of evolution, including human evolution.
[52]
A 2009 survey conducted by the McGill researchers and their international collaborators found that 85% of Indonesian high school students and 86% of Pakistani high school students agreed with the statement, "Millions of fossils show that life has existed for billions of years and changed over time."
[1] However, in Indonesia, creationism is common among older residents, even among biology teachers and biology education professors.
[99]
According to a 2013 Pew study, the numbers of Muslims who support evolution appear to be increasing slowly but steadily. For instance, a large majority of people accept human evolution in Kazakhstan (79%) and
Lebanon (78%), but relatively few in
Afghanistan (26%) and
Iraq (27%), with most of the other Islamic countries somewhere in between.
[4]
A creationist campaign to remove references to evolution from high school biology textbooks in South Korea succeeded in May 2012, according to a report in Nature (June 5, 2012), when "the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology revealed that many of the publishers would produce revised...
ncse.ngo
A creationist campaign to remove references to evolution from high school biology textbooks in South Korea succeeded in May 2012,
according to a report in Nature (June 5, 2012), when "the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology revealed that many of the publishers would produce revised editions that exclude examples of the evolution of the horse or of avian ancestor
Archaeopteryx." Also in the sights of the creationist campaign are references to the evolution of humans and the adaptations of the beak of the finch. All four are favorite targets of creationists, including the "intelligent design" movement. South Korean biologists are complaining that they were not consulted about the revisions; Dayk Jang, an evolutionary scientist at Seoul National University, told Nature, "The ministry just sent the petition out to the publishing companies and let them judge."
The campaign was led by the Committee to Revise Evolution In Textbooks (which Nature calls "the Society for Textbook Revise"), an independent offshoot of the Korea Association for Creation Research. Support for creationism in South Korea is high: in The Creationists (Harvard University Press, 2006), Ronald L. Numbers described the country as "
the creationist powerhouse" in Asia. And acceptance of evolution is comparatively low: 64% of South Koreans
agreed with "human beings are developed from earlier species of animals" in 2002, as compared to 44% of respondents in the United States in 2004, 70% of respondents in China in 2001, and 78% of respondents in Japan in 2001.
Dayk Jang faulted the South Korean scientific community for its inaction and is now organizing a group of experts to counter the creationist campaign. "When something like this comes to fruition, the scientific community can be caught flat-footed," NCSE's Josh Rosenau
told the New York Daily News (June 6, 2012). "Scientists are not by their nature political." South Korea is an up-and-coming scientific powerhouse, Rosenau said, adding that it's crucial to continue to teach evolution in schools if the county wants to compete on the international stage. "Evolution is the core of modern biological science," he said.
Efforts at reform and encourage science in Islam and Christianity, are the Band Aide approach to solve the problem when the adults may philosophy up stairs. They teach the ancient scripture and mythology to the children in the basement.