• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

A ground-zero position when talking about the Bible

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Luther did remove some parts to make a Protestant Bible. He removed 7 books from the original.
It's definitely been refined over the years. Lots of changes and redactions have likely eliminated the orginal in ways that its just not recoverable anymore.

Neither for religious or historical/archeological purposes.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber
so the bottom line, read the bible with our TEACHER, the Holy Spirit, and EVERY WORD IN THE BIBLE IS ALL ONE NEED. for the Holy Spirit will Give Revelation to every scripture. in the bible.
Been there, done that, and ironically reading the Bible--actually reading it instead of looking at what the Pastor said to read--during a crises of faith that lead to me seeing Jehovah in a whole new way. I didn't see the love, mercy, and forgiveness. Instead I saw heinous cruelty, extreme violence, anger and wrath, absolutely nothing I could in good conscience continue to worship.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
It's definitely been refined over the years. Lots of changes and redactions have likely eliminated the orginal in ways that its just not recoverable anymore.

Neither for religious or historical/archeological purposes.
Well one can still go back to source documents in Greek and Hebrew that have been little changed for centuries. In fact this is what is done for many new versions of the bible. Here is the Greek source that is often used: Novum Testamentum Graece - Wikipedia

You will see it is a compilation from various Greek manuscripts known to scholars, as there is no single source.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
If Gen 1 began with the words 'Once Upon a Time' we be interpreting quite differently.


Certainly. The Bible has one of the best openings lines in all of world literature. We should not ignore the poetic drive and energy of those first few verses.

If God could write, he’d struggle to improve on Genesis 1:1-5 and it’s echo in John 1:1-5
 

InChrist

Free4ever
"There is no such thing as the pure, obvious message of the Bible alone."

Would anyone in this forum seriously claim that this is false?
I used to read the Bible and found it confusing and disjointed. Then I was saved and my (spiritual) eyes were opened. Immediately, I could see and understand the consistent theme running through the scriptures; OT and NT- that was Jesus Christ, the promised Messiah and Savior who saves all who trust Him for forgiveness of sin and eternal life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DNB

exchemist

Veteran Member
Certainly. The Bible has one of the best openings lines in all of world literature. We should not ignore the poetic drive and energy of those first few verses.

If God could write, he’d struggle to improve on Genesis 1:1-5 and it’s echo in John 1:1-5
Agree about the second one, certainly. I am just old enough to remember when that was said at the end of every Tridentine mass, the "Last Gospel". Very mysterious and poetic.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
Agree about the second one, certainly. I am just old enough to remember when that was said at the end of every Tridentine mass, the "Last Gospel". Very mysterious and poetic.


I don't very often go to mass these days, but am I right in thinking that it usually ends now with Revelation 22:21 ?

I was a little put out at a friends funeral recently, to find a lot of the liturgy appeared to have been recently "updated". Apart from anything else, I think doing that insults the intelligence of the congregation.
 

Bree

Active Member
The Bible as I see it, is mostly a Catholic invention where they had some fragments and filled in the gaps.

the catholic church did not exist until around the 3rd century... christianity and the bible scriptures was created by Jesus apostles shortly after his death when they were instructed to 'preach' the word of salvation. Their gospels became the basis of christianity. the catholic church had nothing to do with it.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
the catholic church did not exist until around the 3rd century... christianity and the bible scriptures was created by Jesus apostles shortly after his death when they were instructed to 'preach' the word of salvation. Their gospels became the basis of christianity. the catholic church had nothing to do with it.
I don't think any orginal Bible ever survived.

Just vauge scattered bits and pieces, even in medieval times.

What little was left, I suspect the Catholics just filled the holes with their theology and the 'complete bible' was produced then for use by the clergy.

I would say the Catholic church invented most of it.
 

Wandering Monk

Well-Known Member
the catholic church did not exist until around the 3rd century... christianity and the bible scriptures was created by Jesus apostles shortly after his death when they were instructed to 'preach' the word of salvation. Their gospels became the basis of christianity. the catholic church had nothing to do with it.

The Bible never names the authors of the Gospels. We don't know who they were. We only have TRADTION that they were written by the Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John.
 
Last edited:

Bree

Active Member
I don't think any orginal Bible ever survived.

Just vauge scattered bits and pieces, even in medieval times.

What little was left, I suspect the Catholics just filled the holes with their theology and the 'complete bible' was produced then for use by the clergy.

I would say the Catholic church invented most of it.

fortunately, christianity spread far and wide after the first century. It went out into Africa, Asia and Europe which is why there are different forms of christianity. As it spread, the gospels and letters from the apostles of jesus were copied by skilled copiest and delivered to new congregations in all those lands.

There is plenty of evidence that the bible we have today is accurate as modern translators are able to utilise these many manuscripts

Here is some good information about the bible and its historicity
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
I don't very often go to mass these days, but am I right in thinking that it usually ends now with Revelation 22:21 ?

I was a little put out at a friends funeral recently, to find a lot of the liturgy appeared to have been recently "updated". Apart from anything else, I think doing that insults the intelligence of the congregation.
It ends with the Blessing and Dismissal, which can take various forms. Sometimes it might include something along those lines. But there is no fixed recitation from the bible at the end of mass.

The only recent updating I'm aware of (in England and Wales) has been to go back to slightly more literal translations of the Latin, e.g. in the Creed we now say "consubstantial with the Father" (consubstantialem Patri) instead of "of one being with the Father". And we now say "and with thy spirit" (et cum spiritu tuo) instead of "and also with you". And so on.
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
fortunately, christianity spread far and wide after the first century. It went out into Africa, Asia and Europe which is why there are different forms of christianity. As it spread, the gospels and letters from the apostles of jesus were copied by skilled copiest and delivered to new congregations in all those lands.

There is plenty of evidence that the bible we have today is accurate as modern translators are able to utilise these many manuscripts

Here is some good information about the bible and its historicity
It's impossible to be accurate.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
fortunately, christianity spread far and wide after the first century. It went out into Africa, Asia and Europe which is why there are different forms of christianity. As it spread, the gospels and letters from the apostles of jesus were copied by skilled copiest and delivered to new congregations in all those lands.

There is plenty of evidence that the bible we have today is accurate as modern translators are able to utilise these many manuscripts

Here is some good information about the bible and its historicity
Hmm, this is a Jehovah's Witness link, so it is unlikely to reflect the view of most historians about the bible. JWs do not have a reputation for respecting and encouraging scholarship.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
I don't think any orginal Bible ever survived.

Just vauge scattered bits and pieces, even in medieval times.

What little was left, I suspect the Catholics just filled the holes with their theology and the 'complete bible' was produced then for use by the clergy.

I would say the Catholic church invented most of it.


The Catholic Church invented the Torah? Did anyone tell the Jews?
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
"There is no such thing as the pure, obvious message of the Bible alone." Would anyone in this forum seriously claim that this is false?
I'll start with 2 Timothy 3:16-17 that ALL Scripture is inspired by God.
To me the pure obvious Bible message is the message Jesus taught and instructed to teach at Matthew 24:14; Acts 1:8
The main theme of Jesus' teaching was about God' kingdom solution according to Luke 4:43.
God's Kingdom of Daniel 2:44, that God's kingdom government through Christ will end all corrupt rulership now on Earth.
So, yes, there is 'the pure, obvious message' found in the Bible alone about the good news (aka gospel) of God's kingdom in the hands of Christ Jesus who will come to mankind's rescue.
 
Top