Why take the school's word for it? It is obvious that something is a gang symbol when violence becomes its predominant affiliation.
Because gang symbols are a local issue. I googled "Fresno Bulldog" after you mentioned it and saw the gang-related articles and images. Until then, I'd never heard of the Fresno Bulldogs... either the gang or the college team.
This is true with bandannas, not so much with rosaries.
It's probably moreso with bandanas, but that doesn't mean there's no issue with rosaries.
A quick Google search yielded this from
the San Antonio PD guide to gangs in schools:
The use of colored rosary beads and other religious articles have also
been noted. These are subtle indicators of gang membership and are
often hard to notice if you are not looking for them. With the
introduction of strict dress codes and the use of uniforms in the school
systems these type of indicators seem to be favored by the gangsters.
Furthermore some have posted some pictures of tattoos to support the school's decision, which are irrelevant...
If they're irrelevant, why do you keep bringing them up? They aren't support for a ban on physical rosaries, but they also don't suggest that such a ban is unwarranted.
Half of them sport the cross is it too now a gang symbol?
If it's being used by gang members to advertise their membership in the gang, then some crosses may very well be gang symbols. However, wearing crosses is so commonplace that I don't think that it would be reasonable to say that each and every instance should necessarily be banned... if the problem is even of a magnitude where banning some form of the cross is appropriate.
I'd say people making the claim that it is associated with gangs would have to prove it.
I think "prove" may be too strong a word, but I think they have to demonstrate that the ban is reasonable. However, it seems to me that the school has probably done this... at least to the satisfaction of the school board.
Regardless, the rosary is most closely associated with the Roman Catholic Church with pictures such as the Pope grasping his rosary and nuns sporting them as well.
Yes, big rosaries are associated with religious orders. This doesn't suggest that they're a "cultural norm" for lay Catholics than it suggests that lay Catholics normally get
tonsured.
In popular culture many many celebrities have worn them as jewelry and it has become a source of fashion.
And if that's the case, deal with them as fashion. If we're considering them as a fashion accessory rather than a religious item, then it's just as appropriate to ban them as it is to ban Wheelie sneakers, which many schools have done.
These are the two held views of rosaries and I don't think there are any other major connotations and certainly not any that associate it with gangs.
I tried a quick experiment: I Googled "rosary symbol" to see what pops up. Here are how the results for the first page describe the rosary:
- prayer item
- prayer item
- fashion
- gang symbol
- prayer item
- gang symbol
- gang symbol
- gang symbol
- "evil symbol on rosary" (don't know what to make of that one)
- fashion
If it was a cultural norm to wear the rosary as jewelry, then I think I'd hear a lot fewer "my friend wears the rosary as a necklace; is this sacriligeous?"-type calls when I listen to Catholic call-in radio shows.
Catholics dislike many things that the rest of the world doesn't deign to care about.
But if a religious item is disconnected from its religion, then why would this even be considered an issue of "religious expression"?
And if it isn't disconnected from its religion, then shouldn't the religious context of the item be taken into consideration in our assessment of the situation?