Frank Goad
Well-Known Member
1 Corinthians 13:13.What does it mean to you?I think it is a list of good things that a christian should focus on.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I think this is St. Paul in one of his more lucid moments. There are not that many.1 Corinthians 13:13.What does it mean to you?I think it is a list of good things that a christian should focus on.
Love ("agape" in Koine Greek), was what Jesus' message was mainly about, namely "love one another as I have loved you". If we all did this, I do believe the world would be a much better place.1 Corinthians 13:13.What does it mean to you?I think it is a list of good things that a christian should focus on.
That's highly unlikely because, if that were true, the Twelve would have had nothing to do with him, especially with his past.Paul did say a lot of beautiful verses, but it was icing that covered his false doctrine that denied what Jesus said is true. Paul's conversion is pretense, and he is a self-appointed Apostle that refuses to release his title of Pharisee.
You're basically right. Those 3 things will keep people with God and keep them from straying. God gives a little bit of each and they have to be grown and cultivated.1 Corinthians 13:13.What does it mean to you?I think it is a list of good things that a christian should focus on.
The true Apostles desired Paul to convert and be saved. They did not want to abandon a sinner. They were happy to give Paul advice based on what Jesus taught them because Paul did not know what Jesus taught having not followed him as he gave sermons. If the Apostles told Paul what Paul did not want to believe, Paul ignored it and would do what Paul wanted to do. For example, the Apostles told Paul that circumcision as a religious ritual is not done in the true church so Paul went out and circumcised a Greek man's son turning him into a spiritual Jew supporting the covenant of Abraham that Paul refused to stop believing was true. Paul's gospel/church is based on the Abrahamic covenant. The gospel, church of the Living God, that Jesus established is not.That's highly unlikely because, if that were true, the Twelve would have had nothing to do with him, especially with his past.
So you say Paul is the devil.The true Apostles desired Paul to convert and be saved. They did not want to abandon a sinner. They were happy to give Paul advice based on what Jesus taught them because Paul did not know what Jesus taught having not followed him as he gave sermons. If the Apostles told Paul what Paul did not want to believe, Paul ignored it and would do what Paul wanted to do. For example, the Apostles told Paul that circumcision as a religious ritual is not done in the true church so Paul went out and circumcised a Greek man's son turning him into a spiritual Jew supporting the covenant of Abraham that Paul refused to stop believing was true. Paul's gospel/church is based on the Abrahamic covenant. The gospel, church of the Living God, that Jesus established is not.
God gives so many clues that the gospel of Paul is wrong. Jesus called the sons of Abraham that supported the Abrahamic covenant and believed in blood sacrifice for sin removal, "vipers". Paul was blind with scales on his eyes after his lie of seeing Jesus on the road to Damascus. Blind, Paul did not eat or drink for days until the scales fell off.
Real serpents, snakes shed their skin and are blind for 3 to 5 days as the scales loosen and fall from their eyes and during that time they do not eat or drink. Then they slither out of their old skin, still the exact same viper with poison in their mouth that kills people but with a fresh new garment to appear new and attractive.
Which he did.The true Apostles desired Paul to convert and be saved.
False. We know from scripture that Paul met with Peter and the others at least three times, plus there were letters sent back and forth [some with money]-- how many cannot be determined.If the Apostles told Paul what Paul did not want to believe, Paul ignored it and would do what Paul wanted to do.
In addition, people that want to handle real poisonous snakes in their religion to prove they won't die from it are not understanding scripture.The true Apostles desired Paul to convert and be saved. They did not want to abandon a sinner. They were happy to give Paul advice based on what Jesus taught them because Paul did not know what Jesus taught having not followed him as he gave sermons. If the Apostles told Paul what Paul did not want to believe, Paul ignored it and would do what Paul wanted to do. For example, the Apostles told Paul that circumcision as a religious ritual is not done in the true church so Paul went out and circumcised a Greek man's son turning him into a spiritual Jew supporting the covenant of Abraham that Paul refused to stop believing was true. Paul's gospel/church is based on the Abrahamic covenant. The gospel, church of the Living God, that Jesus established is not.
God gives so many clues that the gospel of Paul is wrong. Jesus called the sons of Abraham that supported the Abrahamic covenant and believed in blood sacrifice for sin removal, "vipers". Paul was blind with scales on his eyes after his lie of seeing Jesus on the road to Damascus. Blind, Paul did not eat or drink for days until the scales fell off.
Acts 9:9
And he was three days without sight, and neither did eat nor drink.
Real serpents, snakes shed their skin and are blind for 3 to 5 days as the cloudy scales loosen and fall from their eyes and during that time they do not eat or drink. Then they slither out of their old skin, still the exact same viper with poison in their mouth that kills people but with a fresh new garment to appear new and attractive.
I say Paul sins as he teaches false doctrine and is an antichrist because he does not believe in a virgin birth so denies Father and son. Paul insists the Christ is the seed of Abraham, but Jesus denies the Christ is the seed of Abraham. Paul tells us Abraham is the Father of us all, but Jesus says Abraham is not the father of us all. Paul wants to create a Christ in Paul's image, a son of Abraham, what Paul wants people to believe to follow the traditions of his Pharisee father.So you say Paul is the devil.
Matthew 10:25
It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of his household?
From the start of his preaching as an "Apostle", Paul refused to do what God required. Followers of Jesus were told to first go to Jerusalem to receive Holy Spirit before going out to preach. But Paul tells us he did not do that before going out to preach his own version of religion in the desert for 3 years. So, his first act was one of disobedience to God and Paul was preaching without Holy Spirit. Holy Spirit is given to those that obey God, but Paul only claims he obeys God while he does not. First a person has to believe in water baptism for remission of sin forsaking belief in blood sacrifice and then they receive Holy Spirit. Understanding the true words of God by the voice of Jesus fills you with Holy Spirit/Ghost.Which he did.
False. We know from scripture that Paul met with Peter and the others at least three times, plus there were letters sent back and forth [some with money]-- how many cannot be determined.
The only real friction was between Paul and James, but that may have just been because of Paul's frequent use of hyperbole in his writings [and probably speech as well], especially over the issue of salvation and "faith" and "works".
I disagree with your doctrine. I think you're misunderstanding too many key points of scripture here ...I say Paul sins as he teaches false doctrine and is an antichrist because he does not believe in a virgin birth so denies Father and son. Paul insists the Christ is the seed of Abraham, but Jesus denies the Christ is the seed of Abraham. Paul tells us Abraham is the Father of us all, but Jesus says Abraham is not the father of us all. Paul wants to create a Christ in Paul's image, a son of Abraham, what Paul wants people to believe to follow the traditions of his Pharisee father.
Paul never mentioned the name of Mary, the mother of Jesus, or John the Baptist, the man that Jesus exalted as the greatest man born of a woman. Paul curses John the Baptist because they do not have the same gospel. Paul cursed the Angel Gabriel that told of the birth of John and Jesus because Paul does not believe water baptism removes sin (that at the same time is removing belief in human sacrifice to a God) nor does Paul believe in a virgin birth because Joseph had to fornicate with Mary before marriage in order for Jesus to be of the bloodline of David, son of Abraham. Paul does his best to weaken the concept of water baptism, so it holds no importance when the truth is it is a COMMANDMENT from GOD to do it and believe it. Paul claims he is baptized but he never reveals if he means an actual water baptism believing water not actual blood is for the remission of sin. Jesus never said my death will remove sin. He did say it is the words of God that save.
Galatians 1:8
But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.
Human sacrifice to a God is demonic but it is the foundation of Paul's gospel.
Paul claims being unmarried makes a person closer to God than a married person. Jesus chose Peter to be an Apostle teaching the Words of God and Peter is a married man. So, Paul claims he is closer to God than Apostle Peter and you think there would be no real friction there?Which he did.
False. We know from scripture that Paul met with Peter and the others at least three times, plus there were letters sent back and forth [some with money]-- how many cannot be determined.
The only real friction was between Paul and James, but that may have just been because of Paul's frequent use of hyperbole in his writings [and probably speech as well], especially over the issue of salvation and "faith" and "works".
Again, you still cannot account for why the Apostles even gave Paul the time of day if he was some sort of outcast, especially with his past.From the start of his preaching as an "Apostle", Paul refused to do what God required. Followers of Jesus were told to first go to Jerusalem to receive Holy Spirit before going out to preach. But Paul tells us he did not do that before going out to preach his own version of religion in the desert for 3 years. So, his first act was one of disobedience to God and Paul was preaching without Holy Spirit. Holy Spirit is given to those that obey God, but Paul only claims he obeys God while he does not. First a person has to believe in water baptism for remission of sin forsaking belief in blood sacrifice and then they receive Holy Spirit. Understanding the true words of God by the voice of Jesus fills you with Holy Spirit/Ghost.
Mark 1:8
I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost.
Luke 24:47
And that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name among all nations, beginning at Jerusalem."
Galatians 1:18
"Then after three years I went up to Jerusalem to see Peter, and abode with him fifteen days."
I assure you that Peter was spending those 15 days trying to convert Paul and stop his false doctrine. Peter and the true Apostles never called Paul an Apostle because they know he is not one.
NOTE in Galatians 1, Paul is bragging about his deep knowledge of the Hebrew/Jewish religion and how he profits from it.
Paul also believes the Christ is a son of Abraham that is revealed by the birth of Paul as a son of Abraham. Paul considers himself born holy already in the correct religion given knowledge of the Son by traditions of his religion. Paul loves those blood sacrifice for sin beliefs. He conferred with no man before starting out, because in Jerusalem they would not accept Paul's beliefs since they know the truth Jesus taught. Paul is determined to preach his own Blood Sacrifice and inequality of race and gender beliefs to the heathen without any knowledge of the gospel of Jesus or Holy Spirit from God.
Horrible. No.1 Corinthians 13:13.What does it mean to you?
That's because Jesus was unmarried, and Paul considered his behavior to be the ideal. It also appears, imo, that Paul thought Jesus' return would occur "within this generation", thus marriage would not be necessary. However, in later letters he backs off on that and says it's OK to marry if one is "weak" and may slip into illicit sex.Paul claims being unmarried makes a person closer to God than a married person.
Jesus commanded his Apostles to teach and convert and they were not going to reject a lost sheep no matter how evil he was.Again, you still cannot account for why the Apostles even gave Paul the time of day if he was some sort of outcast, especially with his past.
Also, there's the matter of early Church tradition and practice as to how is it possible that it circulated Paul's letters even prior to any other Church writings, at least as far as we know, if he was some sort of outcaste?
No, I've seen these charges numerous times before, but they simply do not add up.
That was Paul's own personal interpretation that being single is more approved than being married, not the opinion of Jesus or God.That's because Jesus was unmarried, and Paul considered his behavior to be the ideal. It also appears, imo, that Paul thought Jesus' return would occur "within this generation", thus marriage would not be necessary. However, in later letters he backs off on that and says it's OK to marry if one is "weak" and may slip into illicit sex.
Before his conversionPaul was invited into their churches and Paul robbed them.
And you cannot know that with any certainty that you're correct.Paul is not Jesus and Paul did not hear the voice of God.