stvdv
Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
No, I replied after your below quote (other 2 were context):
With my quote
"I did not say this"
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
COVID killed twice as many republicans as it did democrats.
- Thread starter Father Heathen
- Start date
No, I replied after your below quote (other 2 were context):
"I did not say this"
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
" Fact" checkers are the new thought police.
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
I agree. I've seen a lot of it on this thread by people who plug thier ears to the danger of vaccinations that aren't vaccinations.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Really? Checking to see if someone lied to harm others is an example of "thought police"? Wow!
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Whew! Luckily I saw your prior post and put my irony meter in an ignorance insulated vault.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
I was wondering the same thing myself.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Well, you could read through the study's methodology and results, for starters.
SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
Who fact checks the fact checkers?
metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
No surprise here.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Anyone and everyone. If a fact checker is biased they lose credibility. They cannot just claim that someone is wrong, they need to explain why they are wrong. People can now tell that you never pay attention to the corrections that show that you are wrong. Nice shooting, you just shot yourself in the foot with just your question.
stvdv
Veteran Member: I Share (not Debate) my POV
Sadly it's true
BUT on the upside this forces me
To trust my own conscience and gut feeling
Those are actually useful thought police,
providing they correct errors, eg, yours.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
I've provided mine. Where's yours?
But if republicans are really that adamant about thinning their own numbers, then...
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
It's childish and dishonest. Those who turn off their brains and eat swill from the RW propaganda/conspiracy trough deserve nothing but contempt.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Your dopey narrative was soundly crushed beneath the evidence, but you continue to embarrass yourself by wallowing in willful ignorance, intellectual dishonesty, and denial.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
You ignore solid, verifiable data and common sense. There's nothing random about that. People have died due to the stupidity you defiantly and shamelessly embrace. You not only drank the Kool-Aid, you've bathed in it.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
You're entitled to your own opinion, but you're not entitled to your own facts. Reality doesn't bend to conform to the bizarre cartoon fantasies in your head.
We Never Know
No Slack
Fact check: Are more vaccinated people now dying of COVID-19 than unvaccinated?
RALEIGH, N.C. (WNCN) — Are more fully vaccinated people dying of COVID-19 these days than unvaccinated people?
That’s what a new chart making the rounds on social media appears to show.
But it’s easy to misinterpret what it’s actually telling you.
It’s based on CDC data at the national level and plots the number of COVID-19 deaths each week by people who are either fully vaccinated or unvaccinated.
It shows that, for the past few months, more fully vaccinated people have in fact died of COVID than have unvaccinated people
Fact check: Are more vaccinated people now dying of COVID-19 than unvaccinated?
More vaccinated people died from COVID than unvaccinated people in August
https://amp-washingtontimes-com.cdn...accinated-people-died-covid-unvaccinated-peo/
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Yes, and more people probably die with seatbelts on than those without.
So what?