I don't think they're nutters. Who am I to say what God can't do? If God allowed for miracles in ancient times, why not now? We certainly could use some.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That passage still suggests that faith healers - distinct from the average believer - are probably charlatans. Anyone can pray.Mainly aimed at Christians, but possibly also at Jews as well regarding the general concept of faith healing. I've not heard of this within Islam and Baha'iism.
Many Christians like to make fun of those Evangelicals who purport to do faith healing and consider them crazy. How would you view Elijah, Jesus, Peter, Paul, and others who also engaged in faith healing (for ex. Peter healing the cripple, Paul healing Eutychus)? They were doing the same thing. Alright, granted, in your faith you believe these things actually happened. This passage in James also seems to suggests faith healing on the part of Preists,
Are any among you suffering? They should pray. Are any cheerful? They should sing songs of praise. Are any among you sick? They should call for the elders of the church and have them pray over them, anointing them with oil in the name of the Lord. The prayer of faith will save the sick, and the Lord will raise them up; and anyone who has committed sins will be forgiven. Therefore confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another, so that you may be healed. The prayer of the righteous is powerful and effective.
I'm genuinely wondering how Catholics, Orthodox and other non-Evangelicals understand this and how they differentiate between historical faith healers and modern ones?
Thanks.
I'm not sure how; I'm thinking about this line in particular,That passage still suggests that faith healers - distinct from the average believer - are probably charlatans. Anyone can pray.
Right: "the prayer of the faith." Anyone with faith could give "the prayer of the faith." It suggests that faith healing is an ability that any believer has. It doesn't imply that faith healing is a power only bestowed on a select few.I'm not sure how; I'm thinking about this line in particular,
The prayer of faith will save the sick, and the Lord will raise them up...
Yes, I'm not arguing with you over this at all - it's my whole question. If the scripture says this, and we know that faith healing is often bunk (I say often because I'm giving some leeway as a religious person), how do they interpret these passages with that in mind? How do they reconcile the bunk faith healing with their scripture's advice to do exactly that?Right: "the prayer of the faith." Anyone with faith could give "the prayer of the faith." It suggests that faith healing is an ability that any believer has. It doesn't imply that faith healing is a power only bestowed on a select few.
I think mainstream religions also try to reconcile themselves with reality... at least to the point that they don't accept claims that are obviously contradicted by easily available evidence. Faith healing doesn't work, so they aren't going to claim that it does.Yes, I'm not arguing with you over this at all - it's my whole question. If the scripture says this, and we know that faith healing is often bunk (I say often because I'm giving some leeway as a religious person), how do they interpret these passages with that in mind? How do they reconcile the bunk faith healing with scripture's advice to do exactly that?
Yes, and to be canonized as a saint, you must have two (I think it's two) verified miracles, which often are miraculous healings. So Catholicism is not as skeptical and modernist as some are trying to paint it.Catholics and Orthodox don't believe in miracles, such as healing? That's not true at all. At least doctrinally. What individual Catholics believe may differ from what thier church teaches, but that would make them poor Catholics.
"The Catholic practice of "faith healing," also referred to as "spiritual healing," is based on the belief that physical ailments can be healed through prayer and blessing. The phenomenon is evident in the bible and is acknowledged by the Vatican and present in the Catechism, which states The Holy Spirit gives some of his devout followers a special ability to spread prayer in a way to produce physical healing."
Catholicism Beliefs in Faith Healers | Synonym
I guess I am just being too nice here.Catholics and Orthodox don't believe in miracles, such as healing? That's not true at all. At least doctrinally. What individual Catholics believe may differ from what thier church teaches, but that would make them poor Catholics.
"The Catholic practice of "faith healing," also referred to as "spiritual healing," is based on the belief that physical ailments can be healed through prayer and blessing. The phenomenon is evident in the bible and is acknowledged by the Vatican and present in the Catechism, which states The Holy Spirit gives some of his devout followers a special ability to spread prayer in a way to produce physical healing."
Catholicism Beliefs in Faith Healers | Synonym
I actually have no idea who those people are, so I can not say.I guess I am just being too nice here.
I'm talking about these guys:
I get why this isn't legitimate, you get why this isn't legitimate, why isn't it though, when they're doing what the scripture tells them to do and why is stuff like this not a Catholic or Orthodox practice?
In my Baptist church where I grew up in, I was always taught that the fact we had the Bible meant that there was no more miracles because “we have the Bible”. I didn’t really understand the logic, my pastor would say back then they didn’t have a Bible so they needed miracles as proof, but the Bible is suffice for us in the present day so modern miracles like faith healing were a sham. It was something like that it’s been a while
Mainly aimed at Christians, but possibly also at Jews as well regarding the general concept of faith healing. I've not heard of this within Islam and Baha'iism.
Many Christians like to make fun of those Evangelicals who purport to do faith healing and consider them crazy. How would you view Elijah, Jesus, Peter, Paul, and others who also engaged in faith healing (for ex. Peter healing the cripple, Paul healing Eutychus)? They were doing the same thing. Alright, granted, in your faith you believe these things actually happened. This passage in James also seems to suggests faith healing on the part of Preists,
Are any among you suffering? They should pray. Are any cheerful? They should sing songs of praise. Are any among you sick? They should call for the elders of the church and have them pray over them, anointing them with oil in the name of the Lord. The prayer of faith will save the sick, and the Lord will raise them up; and anyone who has committed sins will be forgiven. Therefore confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another, so that you may be healed. The prayer of the righteous is powerful and effective.
I'm genuinely wondering how Catholics, Orthodox and other non-Evangelicals understand this and how they differentiate between historical faith healers and modern ones?
Thanks.
Some Christians are Cessationists, others are Continuationists. The former believes that the gifts of the spirit belonged solely to the Apostolic age, while the latter group believes that the manifestations of the Holy Spirit are still active in the Church since the day of Pentecost, up to today, depending on their faith. I am a literalist, as most evangelicals and fundamentalists are - the Bible is written as a historical narrative, and thus, should be interpreted as such.Mainly aimed at Christians, but possibly also at Jews as well regarding the general concept of faith healing. I've not heard of this within Islam and Baha'iism.
Many Christians like to make fun of those Evangelicals who purport to do faith healing and consider them crazy. How would you view Elijah, Jesus, Peter, Paul, and others who also engaged in faith healing (for ex. Peter healing the cripple, Paul healing Eutychus)? They were doing the same thing. Alright, granted, in your faith you believe these things actually happened. This passage in James also seems to suggests faith healing on the part of Preists,
Are any among you suffering? They should pray. Are any cheerful? They should sing songs of praise. Are any among you sick? They should call for the elders of the church and have them pray over them, anointing them with oil in the name of the Lord. The prayer of faith will save the sick, and the Lord will raise them up; and anyone who has committed sins will be forgiven. Therefore confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another, so that you may be healed. The prayer of the righteous is powerful and effective.
I'm genuinely wondering how Catholics, Orthodox and other non-Evangelicals understand this and how they differentiate between historical faith healers and modern ones?
Thanks.
I appreciate your response anyhow.Some Christians are Cessationists, others are Continuationists. The former believes that the gifts of the spirit belonged solely to the Apostolic age, while the latter group believes that the manifestations of the Holy Spirit are still active in the Church since the day of Pentecost, up to today, depending on their faith. I am a literalist, as most evangelicals and fundamentalists are - the Bible is written as a historical narrative, and thus, should be interpreted as such.
Therefore, Jesus, the Apostles, the group of seventy, Moses, Elijah and Elisha, and many of Jesus' disciples all performed veritable miracles of all sorts (healing, raising the dead, affecting the earth's elements, ...). David prayed that his first son from Bathsheba would be healed from his critical illness, but was denied compliance from God. But, many of David's prayers were answered (Psalms).
I believe that Benny Hinn, Todd White, and most modern day faith-healers are charlatans and blasphemers (ascribing such acts of impotence to the Holy Spirit). Faith healing, which I believe in, requires a great deal of humility, wisdom and faith, and these dispositions are extremely rare even in the most devout adherent.
...sorry Rival, I just reread your post - your question was directed at non-evangelicals. ...ok, disregard everything that I said as being redundant and unrelated.
I'd be careful to take what you see in these three-ring circus faith healing shows, and interpret what you read from scripture as looking even remotely like this modern money-making enterprise.Many Christians like to make fun of those Evangelicals who purport to do faith healing and consider them crazy. How would you view Elijah, Jesus, Peter, Paul, and others who also engaged in faith healing (for ex. Peter healing the cripple, Paul healing Eutychus)? They were doing the same thing. Alright, granted, in your faith you believe these things actually happened. This passage in James also seems to suggests faith healing on the part of Preists,
Are any among you suffering? They should pray. Are any cheerful? They should sing songs of praise. Are any among you sick? They should call for the elders of the church and have them pray over them, anointing them with oil in the name of the Lord. The prayer of faith will save the sick, and the Lord will raise them up; and anyone who has committed sins will be forgiven. Therefore confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another, so that you may be healed. The prayer of the righteous is powerful and effective.
I'm genuinely wondering how Catholics, Orthodox and other non-Evangelicals understand this and how they differentiate between historical faith healers and modern ones?
I get why this isn't legitimate, you get why this isn't legitimate, why isn't it though, when they're doing what the scripture tells them to do and why is stuff like this not a Catholic or Orthodox practice?
You do realise don't you that our first name is human.Jesus did it for free (according to the Bible).
You do realise don't you that our first name is human.
Life was once living freely and no charge was involved.
Charge two fake lying men meaning men owned two wrong thoughts once.... liars greedy wanting I want by choice to think unnaturally by their will.
I want charge as a power of God. Nature gave it freely as a battery. Mud clay. Made into a container. Made some vinegar substance what acid by grapes was. Used earth metals knew what batteries were.
Gained a free charge. So then Mr liar by choice built machines and gave it life from water into wine. Batteries by clay pots.
Machine life for liars.
Trade and status by inventor status made you rich falsely. Second false charge. You made everyone pay for your invention when God owned all bodies itself.
In life third charge was natural human laws who charged your scientific community as guilty of murdering life by invention.
One charge correct only was criminal law.