I read it just fine.Nice jump. You jumped right over the part where danieldemol said to me: "If spirits had mass we could weigh them. Do you put on weight when you are visited by the Holy Spirit?"
and I said to him:
a) Either a spirit has some property that is commonly associated with matter, be it mass, energy, or both; or it does not.
(b) If it does not, the atheists are correct: physical death puts an end to perishable beings and Paul's "imperishable beings" doctrine is nonsense, physical post-death remains dissolve into "stardust", and the entity that I am ceases to exist. In which case, there is no such thing as the afterlife.
(c) If being ceases to be in the grave, Baha'i teaching isn't even close to accurate, much less relevant, as when it prattles on about the afterlife, ...
The answer to clear from the Christian texts if we go back to St Paul’s earliest New Testament resurrection narrative:
Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.
1 Corinthians 15:50
So we don’t need to have perishable bodies with crucifixion wounds going to heaven. Nor do we need any physical attributes such as weight the things that are not of this world.
The nature of the soul is incomprehensible to the mind of man. As Jesus explains:
If I have told you earthly things, and ye believe not, how shall ye believe, if I tell you of heavenly things?
John 3:12
You’re all over the map without providing clear explanation about what you mean by a soul, imperishable body and afterlife.
The measure of agreement between this view, which is founded on careful scientific research, and that of the Bahá’í teachings, is truly remarkable.
I have no idea what scientific research you refer to and what you mean here.
And my opinions are the least of your worries. Baha'i nonsense is your bigger problem.
You’re on shaky ground if you can’t even explain your Christian view let alone produce reasonable explanations to back it up and then label Baha’i beliefs as nonsense.