julianalexander745
Active Member
This thread is a derivative from that thread about that stabbing in Europe.
There was also a post by a staff member that stated there was no meaningful difference between reliance on firearms in war and in presumably any other context in which person on person violence occurs.
Fair enough. And it prompted me to recall the Lindt Seige in Sydney, Australia back in 2014 when the police took just under 24 hours only to end up killing two innocent people along with the perpetrator in a complete and utter mess that the NSW police still were never adequately held accountable for.
When it comes to law enforcement, should the prevalence of police carrying firearms be curtailed in 1st world countries?
I think it should - this isn't 1865 Old West. Watching cops march through shopping centers with their glocks hanging off their waists gives me the ****s sometimes.
Reason dictates that interjecting a significant increase in the intensity and efficiency of active violence will increase the negative consequences of violence overall.
There was also a post by a staff member that stated there was no meaningful difference between reliance on firearms in war and in presumably any other context in which person on person violence occurs.
Fair enough. And it prompted me to recall the Lindt Seige in Sydney, Australia back in 2014 when the police took just under 24 hours only to end up killing two innocent people along with the perpetrator in a complete and utter mess that the NSW police still were never adequately held accountable for.
When it comes to law enforcement, should the prevalence of police carrying firearms be curtailed in 1st world countries?
I think it should - this isn't 1865 Old West. Watching cops march through shopping centers with their glocks hanging off their waists gives me the ****s sometimes.