metis
aged ecumenical anthropologist
Now you got me excited-- er, I mean interested.There's a very good book on this poly vs. mono question: Sex at Dawn - Wikipedia
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Now you got me excited-- er, I mean interested.There's a very good book on this poly vs. mono question: Sex at Dawn - Wikipedia
I hope you read it. Or listen to the audio book. It's very interesting.Now you got me excited-- er, I mean interested.
Back in the day when the Male population was being reduced constantly by war, and infant mortality so high, small civilizations saw it as survival, and females chose to accept it or chance hardships and no children.. I've heard from grand parents that during WW2 that hardly any young men were to be seen in town unless injured, or older men or pre adult boys.im confused about which is supposed to be practiced.There are scriptures that seem to suggest polyamorous relationships are acceptable in the bible when you look at kings and other people.it looks like the original plan was for a monogamous relationship when you read genesis.can anyone explain..
im confused about which is supposed to be practiced.There are scriptures that seem to suggest polyamorous relationships are acceptable in the bible when you look at kings and other people.it looks like the original plan was for a monogamous relationship when you read genesis.can anyone explain..
And all partners are happy with the decision.Its an old book penned over hundreds of years by multiple writers.
My view, do it how you want so long as its legal in your jurisdiction.
And all partners are happy with the decision.
im confused about which is supposed to be practiced.There are scriptures that seem to suggest polyamorous relationships are acceptable in the bible when you look at kings and other people.it looks like the original plan was for a monogamous relationship when you read genesis.can anyone explain..
im confused about which is supposed to be practiced.There are scriptures that seem to suggest polyamorous relationships are acceptable in the bible when you look at kings and other people.it looks like the original plan was for a monogamous relationship when you read genesis.can anyone explain..
Also, since we share about 98% of our dna with chimps, and chimps are promiscuous, our sex unbridled sex drive tends to encourage promiscuity. However, since that is so disruptive to human society because of how long it takes children to mature, most societies abandoned it as a model or sharply restricted it, regardless of religion.
Obviously, Christianity teaches only monogamy, or as one of my former professors called it, "monotony".
Yep-- and they're cuter. Actually married one, and I really go bananas over her.We share roughly the same amount of DNA with bonobos, who are even more promiscuous than chimps!
Let me ask you the same question that the medieval Rabbis asked. Can you give to more than one wife all that she needs? Can you provide for her all the material necessities of life for her and all her children? And what is even more important, can you give to her all the time for listening, for cuddling, for fixing dinner together, for sitting on the porch, for watching TV together, for helping all her children with their homework and going to their ballgames and dance recitals? And if you have the time for even that one wife, do you also have time for the second? Because, quite honestly, most men find they don't have the time and money and heart enough for the first wife, let alone another.im confused about which is supposed to be practiced.There are scriptures that seem to suggest polyamorous relationships are acceptable in the bible when you look at kings and other people.it looks like the original plan was for a monogamous relationship when you read genesis.can anyone explain..
The difference is, we have enough of a conscience to know better than to cheat. Our sense of justice and empathy is more developed than that of other primates.We share roughly the same amount of DNA with bonobos, who are even more promiscuous than chimps!
The difference is, we have enough of a conscience to know better than to cheat. Our sense of justice and empathy is more developed than that of other primates.
Societal values are based on what is best for the group, not what works for the exception to the rule.It's not cheating when you agree to have an open relationship with your partner.
But no multiple wife situations were happy.
In rare cases women could inherit. Job gave his daughters an inheritance with his sons.
There was also the first legal challenge in the Bible where there were no sons and the daughters of Zelophehad went to Moses and God said they were right and they should get an inheritance to carry on their father's name, this was further qualified to say they had to marry in their tribe to keep the inheritance land in the tribe.
There are individualists and collectivists on both the right and left. It's mostly America that has this individualist slant and America is more right-wing than most Western countries.The West, especially those who lean to the left, emphasizes an extreme individualism.
Just because there are no happy polygamous marriages in the bible does not mean that there were no happy polygamous marriages.
On the other hand if the Bible is a guide to life as it claims it carries allot of weight