• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

the crucifiction

Nehustan

Well-Known Member
Well I think neither the disciple in question nor de Molay had hypothetical faith. One was hypothetically crucified in place of the messiah, the other was burnt at the stake for professing that that was the historical fact.
 

Nehustan

Well-Known Member
Well it would be suprising if I didn't know about the Templar. I come from Old European stock, I went through the British Old School system, and I wear two rather attractive seal rings on my left hand. I like to think that de Molay is the man who cut my path to Islam.
 

Nehustan

Well-Known Member
I was raised as an Anglican Christian, attending religious schools (read Church School, through Preparatory School, then Public School), and in 1993 recanted my Nicean Creed (read Trinity) by saying shahada, affirming my belief in the Tawheed of Allah and his last messenger with revelation in word, Muhammad, later recanting my Nicean Creed in writing to the Archbishop of Canterbury....When I reaffirmed my faith at Al Ahzar in Cairo in 1997, the scholar had me state...

As Shaddu La Ilaha Il Allah wa Muhammad Rasul Allah, wa Isa Rasul Allah, wa Musa Rasul Allah (saw).​
 

Nehustan

Well-Known Member
Buttons* said:
well he may say all that stuff about being Muslim, but he's acctually Choodianist

....I've seen that name on people's 'faith' descriptor.....what does it mean???? Link?
 

lilithu

The Devil's Advocate
AGAIN: To any mods who might be reading, is this thread appropriate for the discussion forums? My understanding was that the "discuss individual religions" forums were for people to share information regarding their own faiths or to ask questions about other faiths. It is my understanding that the discussion forums are not for people to come in and make attacks. If the poster wants to make an accusation against a religion, he can do it in the debate forums so that people can actually defend their faith when it is attacked.

***Note:*** This post number three in a series. There seem to be about half a dozen threads started by this poster that would be more appropriate in the debate forums, imo. And if I am wrong, I would like a clarification as to why.

Thanks. :)
 

EnhancedSpirit

High Priestess
lilithu said:
AGAIN: To any mods who might be reading, is this thread appropriate for the discussion forums? My understanding was that the "discuss individual religions" forums were for people to share information regarding their own faiths or to ask questions about other faiths. It is my understanding that the discussion forums are not for people to come in and make attacks. If the poster wants to make an accusation against a religion, he can do it in the debate forums so that people can actually defend their faith when it is attacked.

***Note:*** This post number three in a series. There seem to be about half a dozen threads started by this poster that would be more appropriate in the debate forums, imo. And if I am wrong, I would like a clarification as to why.

Thanks. :)
We have no debate so far. It's a very one sided discussion.
 

Nehustan

Well-Known Member
That would seem a sensible move....tho' as 'Templar' is new I'm guessing he hasn't quite got to grips with the rules....a move might be sensible.
 

Bishka

Veteran Member
Nehustan said:
To open up the debate...have any of you ever come across the Judas crucifixion theory?

Actually, no I haven't. I'm curious, could you enlighten us?
 
A

angellous_evangellous

Guest
thenight_templer said:
you have the post read it and think about it

Now you're aware that thinking only helps some of us. Thinking for other people only increases their misunderstanding.
 

Nehustan

Well-Known Member
beckysoup61 said:
Actually, no I haven't. I'm curious, could you enlighten us?
Sure it goes something like this...paraphrased and I can't bothered with chapter and verse (sorry, I will if I'm pushed but not tonight please!!!!!). Jesus was not an only child, first born of Mary, yes, only child no. Jesus' brothers (James and some have it Judas, tho' Judas may have been a cousin) travelled with him during his ministry. Things get a little hairy and the hierarchy in Jerusalem have it in for Jesus, so a counter plan is formed using a double. When the heat get's too much the Temple guards are lead to Judas the daggerman (read bodyguard, lit. Sicarii) in [SIZE=-1]Garden of Gethsemane, who is kissed as thanks. Judas is 'hung from a tree', but does not die (i.e. spear of destiny already mentioned), he is brought down and reappears called brother (literally or figuratively depending what you believe), which gives us the character Thomas (lit. brother) formally known as Judas. Jesus meanwhile is as Jonah in the belly of the whale.[/SIZE]
 

Bishka

Veteran Member
thenight_templer said:
is it quick run ??
any way
for deepth talking send me email and we will see what exactly ur talking about

Folks....step away.....it's been a murder....who you ask...what happened...I'm sorry the english language has been brutally murdered.
 
Top