-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Atheism - I don't understand it
- Thread starter A-ManESL
- Start date
Looncall
Well-Known Member
How do you know that the voice is not some feature of human psychology?
Why should one accept an exotic explanation when an ordinary one is available?
idea
Question Everything
...the evidence of things not seen. (Hebrews 11:1) some things have to be experienced to be known... for someone who has never tasted chocolate before, can you give them the knowledge of what chocolate tastes like without actually giving them chocolate and allowing them to actually taste it? of coarse, they will refuse to put the chocolate in their mouth if they have no faith in you... faith precedes the knowledge...
by their fruits you shall know them... claims should only be accepted or rejected based upon personal experimentation. If you do not do the experiment, (or do not do it correctly), then it is impossible to know if the claim is true or not.
Last edited:
A Troubled Man
Active Member
Ridiculous, chocolate exists, it can be seen.
idea
Question Everything
human psychology cannot warn me of things outside what my natural senses are able to detect... such as who needs a phone call, or a spider in your shoe...
again, you should only accept it after trying the experiment for yourself.... accept what you personally experience. you know your own mind, and with practice, can come to distinguish the promptings within your thoughts...
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
I wouldn't say those are things that are "outside what your natural senses are able to detect".
idea
Question Everything
I didn't say see it, I said taste it.... you won't really understand what you are seeing until you taste it.
A Troubled Man
Active Member
Unfortunately, personal experience does not gain one knowledge as has been observed throughout history as it lead to people believing the earth was flat and the sun, stars and planets revolved around it.
A Troubled Man
Active Member
You said, "...the evidence of things not seen."
But, that doesn't matter anyways, chocolate can be seen and tasted because it actually exists.
idea
Question Everything
I'm not here to argue the validity of my own personal experiences, but instead to entice others to have and recognize the spiritual guidance that they too receive. We all have a conscience - that Jiminy cricket which rests on our shoulder encouraging us to follow a path of light and truth...
idea
Question Everything
thoughts actually exist... can you see them?
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
But you've not indicated any such thing to have any kind of spiritual or supernatural causation whatsoever. Surely it's just human empathy, logic and natural deduction?
idea
Question Everything
the Earth is relatively flat... if I lay my pencil down on the floor, it doesn't roll away.
draw dots on a balloon, then blow the balloon up - from which point are all others expanding around? which can be called the center?
idea
Question Everything
I think human empathy is spiritually motivated, that all things which go against selfishness/anger/pain are... The primary job of the Spirit is to be with us as a comforter, to testify that we are not alone - that there is a God in heaven who looks over every hair on our heads... It's not about putting on magic shows, never-the-less I can know I have received promptings which did not come from my own spirit as I know my own spirit had no access to the information given... Those within the scriptures have shared many examples of what it is to be led by the Spirit, but it is impossible to understand until you experience it for yourself.
Koldo
Outstanding Member
But what you are doing is attributing events to a particular causation. The question that has to be done is: why did you choose this given cause?
"With practice"? Are you talking about some sort of rigorous program where you test what you learn from your personal experiences against external evidence?
If that's not what you're talking about, then how can you know that this practice actually does what you say it does?
As an analogy, my martial arts senseis have generally discouraged their students from doing a lot of practice on their own, because the student's uncorrected mistakes can end up getting reinforced. How do you know this isn't going on in what you describe? Where's the check to tell you you're doing it right?
I mean, you do agree that the mind can be tricked, don't you?
jarofthoughts
Empirical Curmudgeon
ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
But the question is how could you possibly know or demonstrate any of these things to be so? Just because you believe empathy is "spiritually motivated" doesn't mean it is. I choose to believe empathy is a natural result of human interactivity and social structures - it's an evolutionary mechanism. I don't see any reason whatsoever to attached any spiritual significance to it.
A-ManESL
Well-Known Member
Sorry for not replying immediately. Parts of your question are answered are answered in post 105, 128 though. I don't really know the meaning of "believing in God" in the sense of the word belief being used in this thread. "Gut feeling" is probably the most appropriate term for me for my reason in following the path.
If you can't even say what it means to believe in God, then how can you be surprised or confused by people who don't do it? That's what this thread's about, right?