But who is conscious of being alone . . . with 'what'? The self?
Uh, when did this declaration of oneness say that it's alone with something?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
But who is conscious of being alone . . . with 'what'? The self?
Uh, when did this declaration of oneness say that it's alone with something?
"Alone with something"?
vs.
"In the company of Nothing"?
Aren't Ghosts famously "In the company of Nothing"?
But who is conscious of being alone . . . with 'what'? The self?
Originally Posted by zenzero
Sorry none spoke of being ALONE here.
Originally Posted by zenzero
Friend kriya Yogi,
You are mixing Aloneness with LONLINESS.
Aloneness is when there is no other, its all ONE!
Love & rgds
But who is conscious of being alone . . . with 'what'? The self?
"Alone with something"?
vs.
"In the company of Nothing"?
In my delirious opinion, both ideas are mistaken as both presuppose an "other". In a true state of Oneness, there is no "other", there is no "nothing", there is no "company". There is only Being.Being "alone Alone with "something"?
Or is it Being "In the company of Nothing"?
Sadly, I must look at the DIR that this comment is made in and curb the enthusiasm of my possible critique. Are said view above widely accepted?My meantion of "Ghost" is my reference to the body made of "Mind-Intelligence-Ego" that remains after a suicide ---thus, a Ghost (san. bhuta) exists consciously yet without a gross body ---still desiring but alas without the facility to gratify any desires . . . until the karmic debt subsides and enters a new birth.
The ghost scenario parallels the Bhrasta-yogi (a yogi who back-tracks on the path to moksha; one who has fallen from the path of self-realization; The unsuccessful yogi --Bg6.41-43) ---esp., the Yogi that merges into the Brahmajyoti effulgence, that later, returns to take birth again.
1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 x 1 = 1Friend Bhaktajan,
Thanks for the reminder.
There is none what soever as it is nothingness to even declare anything leave alone being alone. Consciousness is merely consciousness.
If at all one as part of that existence express as a number it is just one.
It is a binary world where we have either zero or one!
In fact even one makes a meaning only because of zero without understanding zero one has no meaning.
Love & rgds
Consciousness is merely consciousness.
No "MY FRIEND" Consciousness is Persona.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
"Zero" + "One" = the whole picture; the whole vista.
a] "One" is composed of duality of opposites (ie ying-yang; or, raja & tama guna) thus vibrating sound 'OM'.
b] "Zero" is composed of undifferentiated omnipresent pure existence without material taints.
These two are maintained by "Persona".
No "MY FRIEND" Consciousness is Persona.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
"Zero" + "One" = the whole picture; the whole vista.
a] "One" is composed of duality of opposites (ie ying-yang; or, raja & tama guna) thus vibrating sound 'OM'.
b] "Zero" is composed of undifferentiated omnipresent pure existence without material taints.
These two are maintained by "Persona".
Only one singular self-born Autocrat is entitled to be the Supreme personality of Personality ---God's Supreme Resplendent Majesty is predictated upon His Personage and His Smile. Entrancement by Persona ---over and above all other allurements ever encountered.
journey on my wayward son,
Bhaktajan
Above and beyond the above Matter-Energy-and-time is a "Persona" supervising the action.
No?
The whole picture, the entire 'Material' creation is composed of two items:
"1" and "0"
"1" = duality of opposites (matter & energy).
"0" = pure existence (empty void) without material taints.
Above and beyond the above Matter-Energy-and-time is a "Persona" supervising the action.
No?
BTW, "journey on my wayward son" (yes this is from an old rock'n roll song) refers to the Souls sojourning in samsara until absolute salvation is achieved.
Languages have been developed by humans to share the understanding of LIFE/EXISTENCE itself and so machine languages too is based on REALITY....so all of reality is based in Machine language?
Yes, duality stands that way as it is light or absence of light etc. On/offI thought 1 was essentially "on", "true", etc., while 0 was "off", "false," etc.
Take the liberty to express the above in this manner:“All the world's a stage, And all the men and women merely players”