You like to attack evolution but I have never heard positive evidence for your beliefs please provide some.
Hi.
I can be called a creationist, a evolutionist, a atheist, a gnostic etc, thing is I like to look at life from many perspectives, life is just too intricate to look at it from only one or two angles.
To give absolute proof by anybody is just about impossible. Looking from a scientific (I am not a scientist) point of view tell me that whatever is under the microscope and living, some form of creation must have caused that living thing to be here, millions of years ago that small living thing might have looked differently due to an evolution process the ancestors of that living thing had gone through, scientific studies have indicated with relative proof that what I am stating here is quite possible.
To just reject the creationists claim out right could also be wrong, we don't know due to lack of evidence whether a creator exist or not. Whatever we look at around us tells us it must have started somewhere, and with something. Nothing can be created with nothing, the evolutionist claim that everything just started some time in the past from a big bang is also a theory, a theory which can be explained from a number of angles to make it look possible but is it even close to true? No definately not.
If it did start from a big bang, something caused the big bang, yes a number of elements which interacted and 'pow' here we are! Something or someone must have mixed those elements knowing exactly what the outcome would be, the design of every living thing we look at and investigate tells us that a intelligence was involved, that is a conclusion all scientists come to after having studied life for some time, even the hard core atheist scientists, but lack of proof deny them to accept a creator.
Something the creationists and evolutionists can think about is this; grass, plants, trees, flowers, insects, small to large animals, germs, viruses etc, live, all those things breath in air, and eat in some manner, same as us!
Religion and folkreligion across the globe talks about spirit, and life after death etc.
No dead man we know have come back yet in another body some hundred or thousand years later and while awake told us exactly who he or she was all those years ago and prove it by way of historical books etc, because of this we don't want to believe in spirit, no proof!
Ok, let's assume; according to science the first life on earth were microscopic organisms similar to the amoeba and also procreated by way of self division. many years later due to survival instincts these organisms have mutated into various different bigger creatures, but to this day we still find those exact same microscopic organisms, and in remote areas some of their later descendants!
Which tells us what?
Creation hasn't stopped!
Some time ago a scientist told me that a group of scientists experimented with atoms, they managed to lock a atom inside a container, placed a wall in the middle with a slot in it and chased the atom through the slot to the other side, the scientist busy with the test expected the atom to hit the other wall in a direct line, but it didn't, it veered from the straight line and hit at a place not "expected" he tried again, same result, another scientist tried, same story.
He then asked me my opinion, which is this; that small microscopic thing experience us fully, but we only experience it in a small way. Which led me to think that nature can 'read' us, but we due to our ignorance in relation to spirit cannot 'read' nature.
My suggestion is; do you think it is possible that spirit evolve the same as the physical entities which first breathed the air on this planet, is it possible that we have reincarnated numerous times learning all the way and because of this are able to grasp science so readily, but our ignorance in regards to spirit is keeping us back? Is preventing us to really understand creation?
Just a thought.
walmul.
