Since no one's helping you I'll try to do both parts.
The human eye and flagellum are so inherently complex they couldn't have evolved to be such a way, therefore evolution is false.
Argument from Ignorance. Nobody knows everything, so why conclude that something is impossible just because...
Just use circular logic that suspends logic and target people who can't read like the others did. Don't try doing the Scientology thing- that dude got lucky.
If his heart was in the 'right' place he would have done some research on Atheism. That was just pure bigotry, and I don't see how anyone- religious or not- can take this man seriously after such baseless bigoted assumptions. If he tries to target any other religion like this he might have a...
How would one confirm that the knowledge you know is true? If its impossible, wouldn't both parties still walk around like this? :pirate:
What if that's how I normally walk around? Why you so mean?
Yes, but until then the default position is disbelief, yo.
You're sounding pseudosciencey. It's cool to think about things like this, but in the end we are demonstrably limited to only move things with our muscles, and nothing else.
- Metal
I see 2 possibilities. 1) The occurrence is rare and those with the ability choose not to demonstrate it. 2) They can't demonstrate it. I don't think anyone should believe #1 by default.
Well that escalated quickly. :D
But bodily processes are still parts of the body. You certainly aren't...
I never claimed there was? I am not trying to disprove a god here, I am simply stating that you haven't met your burden of proof to make the claim that a god does exist.
:facepalm:
1) 100% wrong. If something was absolute, it could NOT turn out false.
2) Again... I never made such a claim...
No, scientific laws are testable, demonstrable principles. Theories are groups of laws with explanatory power. I don't know how you think the theory of evolution 'overcomes' abiogenesis, since if both were true they would not hurt each other.
The universe is the totality of existence.
1]...
1A) Both radioactive decay and the spontaneous appearance of virtual particles begin to exist without a cause. (Carbon-14 decays to Carbon-12, etc)
1B) Even if this were true, how do you know that this is not just a property of the Universe which can't be applied outside of it?
1C) You refer...
I'm new. I'm Jesse. You can call me whatever you feel like.
So I used to be a Creationist. I used to go online and debate atheists, and explain to them why they were wrong and why I was right. As I grew, I realized that I was being intellectually dishonest.
I went through this Deist...