YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
But evolutionists' are sure humans will evolve to maybe(?) another species? who knows, do evolutionists?Hehehe, like how? Do you know what new animal species comes after humans?
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Irony of the evolutionary belief
- Thread starter Eli G
- Start date
They do.
The doctrine says that the evolution of new species is an infinite natural process with no fixed goal.
But even is there are thousands of human variations, all of us are humans and nothing else ... not even apes as some of they say.
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
God is God and humans are not. Scientists are saying that humans are pretty close to destruction. By themselves. No God needed for human destruction as far as they are concerned.
I seriously don't know what you're talking about.Don't you say that the teaching of evolution "is well evidenced, predictive, and productive".
You may say things out of a manual, but you don't seem to know what you write.
How do I not know what I write?
No, it's not. Do you really believe the flora and fauna of ten or a hundred million years ago was the same we see today? Do you really believe todays species have always existed?
Why are we not apes? Don't we have the definitive, taxonomic features of apes?
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
That is why logic really doesn't play a part in the minds of some believers in evolution as if that's how we all came about, although I can understand their viewpoints (sometimes). Gorillas remain gorillas, chimps stay as chimps.
Do you really think that the mosquitoes, flies and ants of millions of years ago were so different from the ones we see today?
Do a simple exercise: Google any of those animals trapped in amber... and you will understand reality better. It is not as they paint it in the books, nor were humans from thousands of years ago as physically horrible as they make you believe.
Put your feet on the ground and stop fantasizing.
They claim that the changes respond to certain factors...
If you compare the skin of an ape with that of a human you will see a big difference. Logic would say that if an ape's skin would change to adapt to the conditions, it would not be to make it more delicate and thin, but rather thicker, stronger and coarser, so that it would serve it better in its physical tasks.
But it is evident that human delicacy is not a result of any evolution from natural needs, but rather an excellent creation of God full of beauty and magnificence compared to the rest of the animal world.
Do you expect the changes to occur as you watch?
Ridiculously, some evolutionists claim that they can see them constantly.
Insects, have existed for millions of years, but species come and go with some frequency.
You must be aware that many familiar animals and plants did not exist millions of years ago. Where did they come from?
God is God and humans are not. Scientists are saying that humans are pretty close to destruction. By themselves. No God needed for human destruction as far as they are concerned.
Unfulfilled Watch Tower Society predictions - Wikipedia
YoursTrue
Faith-confidence in what we hope for (Hebrews 11)
Commentators make mistakes sometimes. Scientists make mistakes. Yet scientists do say mankind is close, very close, not to Armageddon but rather the brink of -- catastrophe. "The members of the Science and Security Board have been deeply worried about the deteriorating state of the world." Closer and closer...Unfulfilled Watch Tower Society predictions - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Current Time - 2024 - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
It is 90 seconds to midnight.
thebulletin.org
I don't know how to answer that...
It's like you think mosquitoes, flies or ants are not species of animals.
What makes you think that?
Ridiculously, some evolutionists claim that they can see them constantly.
29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent
This article directly addresses the scientific evidences in favor of macroevolutionary theory and common descent. It is specifically intended for those who are scientifically minded but, for one reason or another, have come to believe that macroevolutionary theory explains little, makes few or...
Commentators make mistakes sometimes. Scientists make mistakes. Yet scientists do say mankind is close, very close, not to Armageddon but rather the brink of -- catastrophe. "The members of the Science and Security Board have been deeply worried about the deteriorating state of the world." Closer and closer...
So if we live long enough, scientists predict disaster for mankind.Current Time - 2024 - Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists
It is 90 seconds to midnight.
Lol. How many scientists do you know who make predictions of exact dates for the end of the world and encourage their followers to sell all their possessions and donate it to them? Did the Watch Tower Society ever compensate those who sold their houses and were left destitute?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
How would you prove that? Now I know how I could prove that new species emerge all of the time, but you just made a claim that requires evidence.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No, you are an ape too. But do not worry. Your descendants, if you ever have any, will always be humans and also always be apes as well. You cannot evolve out of your clade.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
They are not "species" They are much larger groups. There are countless species of mosquitoes. There are countless species of flies etc. But to try to claim that a large group is a "species" is like trying to claim that a country is a city within that country. You made a category error.
What an interesting thing to think about: why would I classify mosquitoes in many different "species"? If I only have one pair of them, wouldn't I get all the supposed "many" species of them out of that only couple?
It seems to me that evolutionists like to exaggerate things too much to make them look more impressive.
Noah may have had a simple pair of mosquitoes breeding on the ark at the beginning. They reproduce like rabbits, the very uncomfortable little characters.
BTW, why is there so much "speciation" of mosquitoes? What would be the evolutionary need for so many "species" of them, according to the teachers of the doctrine of the evolution of species?
It seems to me that evolutionists like to exaggerate things too much to make them look more impressive.
Noah may have had a simple pair of mosquitoes breeding on the ark at the beginning. They reproduce like rabbits, the very uncomfortable little characters.
BTW, why is there so much "speciation" of mosquitoes? What would be the evolutionary need for so many "species" of them, according to the teachers of the doctrine of the evolution of species?