• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Would you bomb Osama if it meant some civilian lives?

Would you bomb Osama if some civilians would die as well?

  • Yes

    Votes: 8 29.6%
  • Maybe

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • No

    Votes: 17 63.0%

  • Total voters
    27

Mathematician

Reason, and reason again
The question was asked last night, and the only person who answered no was Dennis Kucinich.

If you had 5 minutes to react to credible intelligence which placed Osama in an area where a small group of civilians resided, would you order the attack?
 

Mike182

Flaming Queer
no, the needs of the many do not outweigh the needs of the few to the extent where blind killing is a positive.
 

McBell

mantra-chanting henotheistic snake handler
The question was asked last night, and the only person who answered no was Dennis Kucinich.

If you had 5 minutes to react to credible intelligence which placed Osama in an area where a small group of civilians resided, would you order the attack?
No, I would not.
 

Reverend Rick

Frubal Whore
Premium Member
You have to realize that removing him from the planet would save far more lives than you took. If you were around Osama, you should have knew the risks involved in doing so.
 

Dream Angel

Well-Known Member
The question was asked last night, and the only person who answered no was Dennis Kucinich.

If you had 5 minutes to react to credible intelligence which placed Osama in an area where a small group of civilians resided, would you order the attack?

No, especially being as you can never been certain if he is actually there or not!

Its like the old question.... Two men in a burning building.. you can only save one person! One is your father, the other is a scientist who has just found the cure to cancer? Which one would you save?
Do you save one and kill many
Or sacrifice your father and save many.
 

Pariah

Let go
Its like the old question.... Two men in a burning building.. you can only save one person! One is your father, the other is a scientist who has just found the cure to cancer? Which one would you save?

I would save the scientist.
And I would bomb Osama.
 
The question was asked last night, and the only person who answered no was Dennis Kucinich.

If you had 5 minutes to react to credible intelligence which placed Osama in an area where a small group of civilians resided, would you order the attack?

Oh yes.

The civilians? They could watch the public, videotaped beheading of Osama if they wanted.

I'm pretty sure that type of justice is a-okay in Osama's world. So why not do it?
 
Oh yes.

The civilians? They could watch the public, videotaped beheading of Osama if they wanted.

I'm pretty sure that type of justice is a-okay in Osama's world. So why not do it?

I just read the poll and saw bombing was the option. Woops.

I'd like to change my answer to "no."

Sorry about that.
 

wizanda

One Accepts All Religious Texts
Premium Member
If Osama Bin ‘Laden’ removes his fund from American system, that is 5 trillion dollars and enough for America to go bust over night (so i heard).....so why would you send bombs or planes, when you can remove foundations?......makes no logical sense in the slightest……just like attacking Iraq as it had weapons of mass destruction buried next to their oil wells…which are most likely owned by the Laden family also…..????
 
Top