You've made it abundantly clear that despite your ignorance, you continue denying the God concept (not necessarily the same thing as God).
False, I have never denied there are God concepts.
I distinguish the two because a God concept is all some people have.
I suggest it is all believers have since thus far no gods are known to exist outside of human imagination. I see you like to bluff this issue, claiming that a God exists, but you haven't followed through with actual evidence and a coherent explanation.
However, make no mistake, there are higher dimensions which you deny because of your blatant ignorance. I've accessed these dimensions through dreams and psychedelics. They allow access to the subconscious mind. I was granted extrasensory perception with the latter while awake in my surroundings. Where entities (good and evil) have interacted with my sleeping body by pushing it or ever so gently touching it. This entire world (which is more real than this one) you deny.
Sounds like a great imagined experience you had. I'm not convinced it is what you think it is. Sorry.
It is because of these higher dimensions which are currently beginning to be understood by String Theorists (still an imprecise science), that we understand that beyond death and the horror of anti-creation and annihilation, consciousness continues on its never-ending journey.
My guess is you misunderstand their science.
Firstly, you must admit to the logic that reality is perceiving itself through you. If you deny the logic of self-perceptual reality and observer-participance, then I cannot help you. I can only point out that experience says nothing about dimensions beyond the material realm.
Logic is a tool. It is evidence that you need, and that you don't offer any is your Achilies Heel. You are very good at making fantastic claims, but very bad at showing they are true, or even likley true.
The first step towards accepting God begins with logic. You may or may not have ever had a spiritual experience or a meaningful dream that makes you question whether or not it was more real than the waking world, but I and many others have. It is due to this inconsistency that atheists mistake what is presented to their limited senses as all they believe in.
There is no logic in assuming dreams are factual or revealing of some mysterious reality. Notice your lack of support for anything you claim.
Ooops, you forgot the evidence that demonsrates a God exists, and is reality. Hence, you are mistaken once again.
I refer to the almighty truth that is unveiled through things like extrasensory perception (the 6th sense) and Quantum theory. Atheism is a Classical theory and a primitive belief.
What an excellent example of confirmation bias. You have decided what truth is, and no test in reality.
Some theists may be fools but at the very least they have faith in one almighty God. Personally, I've observed a wide intellectual range among theists. But the most intelligent among them side with a logical theological framework.
Don't ignore Hindus who have multiple gods. So if some theists are fools and have faith in at least one God, how reliable can their belief be?
Existence does not equate to matter. It equates to information, which equates to mind, which equates to reality.
You accused atheists being comforted by the thought of there being nothing but matter, and I asked what else can be conformed as existing. And all you can come up with is information? Information is a human construct, and as such depends on minds, which are material processes. So your answer is that you can't inform us that there is anything other than matter existing.
Let me make it clear that I do not consider myself a theist.
Yet oddly asserts a God exists as a fact. Sorry, you're in that category. Why would you even want to think a God exists in the first place?
I am a scientific genius who embraces metaphysics.
Did you come to this realization in your dreams, or on psychedelics?
I apologize for my wording.
I meant to enlighten you as an atheist on the correct concept of God. Which I possess.
Why don't you enlighten we atheists with evidence of this God. The concept means nothing. It's just a description. Do you possess that, or still just bluffing?
Once again, you are equating human imagination with logic and/or reality. I have a solid foundation for God that is contained within my mind as do a number of other individuals. I do not base this knowledge on the shaky foundation of fanciful beliefs.
I don't believe you. I guess you have convinced yourself, which is easy for theists to do to themselves, but you haven't offered any comvelling evidence nor an explanation to you are correct.
I have not failed to accomplish my goal of establishing a solid argument for God.
You're just failing to present it. Are you afraid to? Maybe it has errors.
It is you and a few militant atheists who struggle with the correct concept of God that has led to your downfall.
A downfall that you imagine in your dreams, perhaps. But of course it is easier to blame others than be honorable and back up your extraordinary claims. I'm not sure if you are bluffing, or insecure about what you think is the correct concept of God, and not having evidence for it.
If you ask anyone else they would agree with me.
Like your grandmother? Who is coming to your defense on the forum?