• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Harriet Hageman defeats Liz Cheney in Wyoming primary

exchemist

Veteran Member
I think Liz Cheney's words on what she intends to do now are worth sharing:

On Wednesday, Cheney laid out her priorities for the next few months before leaving the House in January.

Beyond “representing the people of Wyoming”, she said: “We have a tremendous amount of work left to do on the January 6 committee. And also, though, I’m going to be making sure that people all around this country understand the stakes of what we’re facing, understand the extent to which we’ve now got one major political party, my party, which has really become a cult of personality.

“We’ve got to get this party back to a place where we’re embracing the values and the principles on which it was founded. And talking about fundamental issues of civics, fundamental issues of what does it mean to be a constitutional republic.”

Cheney, daughter of former Republican vice-president Dick Cheney, attacked both Trump and the House Republican leader, Kevin McCarthy, the architect of her ousting from the party’s House leadership in May 2021 after she denounced the former president’s false claims of a stolen election. She expressed her belief that “the Republican party today is in very bad shape”.

“Donald Trump has betrayed Republican voters. He’s lied to them. Those who support him have lied to them and and they’re using people’s patriotism against them,” she said.

“They’re preying on people’s patriotism. Kevin McCarthy made his decision a few weeks after January 6, knowing what he knew about Donald Trump’s role in the assault on the Capitol, when he went to Mar-a-Lago and said we’re going to welcome him back into the party. To me, that’s indefensible.

“I believe that Donald Trump continues to pose a very grave threat, a risk to our republic, and I think defeating him is going to require a broad and united front of Republicans, Democrats and independents. That’s what I intend to be a part of.”

I have to say I think this is well expressed and spot-on. The grip that TFG has on the Republican party and its supporters is a real threat to democracy and the rule of law.

(from: Liz Cheney considers run for president after Republican primary defeat )
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
I have significant doubts that her replacement could do worse than support a war and promulgate pro-war messages in the media, but perhaps I'm too optimistic considering the abysmal state of the GOP.
Cheney might have supported a war overseas, but she's not supporting one on US soil like the MAGAs are gearing up to do.

And now Liz says she might run for president. So that would be a even bigger influence over the USA.
 

Secret Chief

nirvana is samsara
Well, maybe not so much in the West, but in other parts of the world, the far-left has gotten a sizable following, mainly due to the excesses, misery, and despair brought about by the capitalist/nationalist right.
Ah, thought you were just referring to the US. :)
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
President Trump never started any wars.
Only in America. Looks who is calling for a civil war, it is MAGAs. Trump supporters have already attacked our government. Of course they are not very smart, so their efforts were just attempted sabotage.

Would you join an attack against the FBI if you saw a bunch of MAGAs with guns attacking them? If not, why not?
 

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Only in America. Looks who is calling for a civil war, it is MAGAs. Trump supporters have already attacked our government. Of course they are not very smart, so their efforts were just attempted sabotage.

Would you join an attack against the FBI if you saw a bunch of MAGAs with guns attacking them? If not, why not?
Only if I had my intergalactic invasion army thats still on backorder.

It's hard being a wannabe upstart dictator..
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
I'm no fan of Liz Cheney's politics but she has what is obsolete to some: honor. She's a mensch (it's not a gendered word). And voting for a war is much much much less of a problem than those who would destroy America as a democracy by trying to steal elections, supporting and excusing a coup attempt (Jan 6) and so forth.

I'm not sure by what metric stealing elections or supporting a coup attempt is much more of a problem than voting for a war where half a million people were killed. There is neither honor nor integrity in that; those who are complicit in war crimes and mass murder are far from honorable.

Do you not see these assertions as devaluing the lives of the Iraqis who were killed in the war?
 
Last edited:

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
What do you know of the candidate replacing her?
I know nothing of her. So I don't know who is
worse. But Cheney at least opposes Trump &
his dangerous cult following.

She was part of Bush's administration and their dangerous cult-like beliefs on war. I see no substantial difference.

Edit:
I've read a little about here.
The most significant thing is that this once
pro-Cheney anti-Trump politician has joined
Trump's cult, claiming that he's the greatest
President of all time. This should be of great
concern to anyone opposing Cheney.

Praise and support for Bush and Cheney concern me just as much, if not more. For all of his faults, Trump didn't start two wars. There is no measure by which Bush and Cheney are any better.
 

Debater Slayer

Vipassana
Staff member
Premium Member
Cheney might have supported a war overseas, but she's not supporting one on US soil like the MAGAs are gearing up to do.

And what is the takeaway from that supposed to be? Is supporting a war overseas and contributing to 500,000 deaths less of a problem because it happened outside the U.S.? I thought liberalism was supposed to prioritize human life over political and national identity.

And now Liz says she might run for president. So that would be a even bigger influence over the USA.

I wish her as much failure in that endeavor as she has had in the midterms. I suspect that will end up being the case, too, because she's not aligned enough with mainstream Republican preferences and not appealing to liberal voters compared to Democratic candidates. She has no hold on either major voting base.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Not any foreign ones, mainly because he longs to be an autocrat too. Besides, he was too busy attacking the Constitution and democracy, wanting to turn the military into his personal police force, failing that he riled up his minions and attempted a coup. But, like his many business ventures, thankfully he failed at that too.
Nor any domestic ones. Meanwhile the Democrats encouraged civil unrest in cities across the nation.
 
Top