• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

God is disproven by science? Really?

MrIntelligentDesign

Active Member
If you are going to propose that cells are intelligently designed then what is intelligent in the design of cancer cells, especially those in children?
I am not proposing. I am checking if there is no intelligence (or smart, intention, etc..) in biological world, as concluded by supporters of Evolution. So, the logical solution is to find the definitions of intelligence (71 of them right now) and use them one by one to solve the problem for Biology.

Thus, is biological cell intelligently designed or not?

By using Evolution and its explanations, there is no answer. WHOSE FAULT?

If there is no answer, either reality has no intelligence or Evolution is stupid and ignorant of reality, and those supporters of Evolution.

Did you get me?
 

MrIntelligentDesign

Active Member
Epic debate with our OP:

That was my very first time debate or discussion in YouTube, with Jackson Wheat, with AronRa. But, the last time I talked with AronRa, he was very afraid of me, in Atheist Experience. I wrote e-book for his stupid Phylogeny Challenge. Do you want a link?

BTW, I can give you link in where AronRa had panicked when I talked to him about the Flood..

No one can defeat me in any debate.
 

MrIntelligentDesign

Active Member
I want you to follow the same track as any other idea in science.

Meaning: you formulate a testable and falsifiable hypothesis and support that hypothesis with data.
You lay out the testable predictions it makes and acknowledge the difficulties and assumptions required.

You write up a proper paper and send it in for subsequent review and publication (if it passes review).

You haven't done ANY of these things.
I think that you did not even submit one article in science journals. I had been submitting for almost 10 years ago.

Remember that peer-reviewers and journals are not like Spell-Check for Microsoft Word, that if you got a mistake in grammar or spelling, Spell-check will automatically do it for you - with no emotion, no envy, no religious or atheistic perspective.

No. My articles talked/discussed about the discovery of intelligence, that will falsify and replace Evolution. From this topic, I will change science forever (from your dictionaries, first) and become very famous and rich. Thus, for professional envy, they did not allow me to be published! They will let you die without knowing what is intelligence and will let you die without answering this question:

is biological cell intelligently designed or not?

You see how cruel they are to you? What if your children ask you that question?
 
Last edited:

MrIntelligentDesign

Active Member
I know what intelligence is. In fact, there are many different kinds of intelligence.
Anybody can invent definition of intelligence. We have 71 invented definitions of intelligence now, but, they cannot answer this question:

is biological cell intelligently designed or not?
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
How could he win the debate if he cannot define intelligence? AronRa is very afraid of me since I answered his Phylogeny Challenge. He cannot defeat it. Do you want a link?
You didn't answer it and you lost. Not wanting to waste time debating with you about your nonsense is not fear of you.
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
Anybody can invent definition of intelligence. We have 71 invented definitions of intelligence now, but, they cannot answer this question:

is biological cell intelligently designed or not?
Apparently you have invented a whole lot about it and have answered no questions for your efforts.
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
That was my very first time debate or discussion in YouTube, with Jackson Wheat, with AronRa. But, the last time I talked with AronRa, he was very afraid of me, in Atheist Experience. I wrote e-book for his stupid Phylogeny Challenge. Do you want a link?

BTW, I can give you link in where AronRa had panicked when I talked to him about the Flood..

No one can defeat me in any debate.
You have never won any of those debates. But the floors were clean in the end.
 
Last edited:

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
I think that you did not even submit one article in science journals. I had been submitting for almost 10 years ago.

Remember that peer-reviewers and journals are not like Spell-Check for Microsoft Word, that if you got a mistake in grammar or spelling, Spell-check will automatically do it for you - with no emotion, no envy, no religious or atheistic perspective.

No. My articles talked/discussed about the discovery of intelligence, that will falsify and replace Evolution. From this topic, I will change science forever (from your dictionaries, first) and become very famous and rich. Thus, for professional envy, they did not allow me to be published! They will let you die without knowing what is intelligence and will let you die without answering this question:

is biological cell intelligently designed or not?

You see how cruel they are to you? What if your children ask you that question?
Your publications are nonsense. The reviewers correctly recognize that nonsense and reject it. Why would they be envious of a person that isn't a scientist whose submissions are nonsense?
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
That was my very first time debate or discussion in YouTube, with Jackson Wheat, with AronRa. But, the last time I talked with AronRa, he was very afraid of me, in Atheist Experience. I wrote e-book for his stupid Phylogeny Challenge. Do you want a link?

BTW, I can give you link in where AronRa had panicked when I talked to him about the Flood..

No one can defeat me in any debate.
He didn't panic. Why would anyone panic debating you about claims you cannot support or questions you refuse to answer?

You were defeated in every debate I watched.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
That was my very first time debate or discussion in YouTube, with Jackson Wheat, with AronRa. But, the last time I talked with AronRa, he was very afraid of me, in Atheist Experience. I wrote e-book for his stupid Phylogeny Challenge. Do you want a link?

BTW, I can give you link in where AronRa had panicked when I talked to him about the Flood..

No one can defeat me in any debate.
Thank you for starting my day with a fantastic laugh. You have not learned anything since your monumental loss to Aron Ra. He is not afraid of you. No one is afraid of you. Your "science" is that of a fifth grader at best.

Would you mind telling us what you do for a living? Clearly it can be anything to do with the sciences.

And I would love to see where you ever made Aron panic. Even pretend scientists know that there was no flood.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I am not proposing. I am checking if there is no intelligence (or smart, intention, etc..) in biological world, as concluded by supporters of Evolution. So, the logical solution is to find the definitions of intelligence (71 of them right now) and use them one by one to solve the problem for Biology.

Thus, is biological cell intelligently designed or not?

By using Evolution and its explanations, there is no answer. WHOSE FAULT?

If there is no answer, either reality has no intelligence or Evolution is stupid and ignorant of reality, and those supporters of Evolution.

Did you get me?

I can see that you still do not understand the scientific method and the burden of proof. The burden of proof always falls upon the person making the positive claim. Believers in Intelligent Design have the burden of proof for their silly ID claims. And why are they silly? Because the people for that idea cannot find any evidence for it .


When we say that life is evolved and people ask for evidence, we can gladly give them endless evidence that fits the criterion for scientific evidence. To date no one on the ID side can do the same. In a scientific debate one has to support one's own claims for one's own beliefs. You are not responsible for supporting the ideas of one's opponent. if they cannot do that they have lost the debate. That is why you lost to Aron Ra and everyone else in the past. They could support their beliefs. You could not support yours.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
You don’t understand what I said? Some things you need faith for but once you received what you had faith for you have it.
Maybe an earthly example: Your Dad said he was going to buy you a car for your birthday. Do you need faith to believe he will buy you a car? Yes How long do you need faith that he will buy you the car? What about when your birthday comes and the car is right there and he gives you the title and keys to the car, do you need faith for the car anymore? No
Now you're equivocating. We've already been down this road before.
 
Now you're equivocating. We've already been down this road before.
If you still don’t get it then move along on that, it’s very simple. You either hear or you don’t.
Why? Because they don't agree with your Biblical interpretations?
No, because they take faith in objects that can’t talk or do anything for you. The theory doesn’t make any sense, doesn’t work anywhere in life.
 

MrIntelligentDesign

Active Member
Thank you for starting my day with a fantastic laugh. You have not learned anything since your monumental loss to Aron Ra. He is not afraid of you. No one is afraid of you. Your "science" is that of a fifth grader at best.

Would you mind telling us what you do for a living? Clearly it can be anything to do with the sciences.

And I would love to see where you ever made Aron panic. Even pretend scientists know that there was no flood.
If you will see the date of upload in YouTube, you will see that it was my first time talking or discussing science with AronRa. I thought that he was looking for the new discovered definition of intelligence, but I had found out that his goal was to crush me with his Phylogeny Challenge.

AronRa's tactics in debate is to use the strength of Phylogeny Tree, as invented from Evolution and as he had discussed in his YouTube video. Both old ID and Creation camp has no answer for that. Only from the new <id>...

So after talking to him many times in Non-Seq Show and Atheist Experience, I told him that I will rebut his Phylogeny Challenge. I did.
He was really afraid of me, for he could never answer the Phylogeny Answer that I had given him. I asked Jackson Wheat, the one who appeared on my first video on YouTube you uploaded to contact AronRa and fight me. He is really afraid of me.

But look, the challenge was for the old ID. But I will crush all explanations that will never use intelligence.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
If you will see the date of upload in YouTube, you will see that it was my first time talking or discussing science with AronRa. I thought that he was looking for the new discovered definition of intelligence, but I had found out that his goal was to crush me with his Phylogeny Challenge.

AronRa's tactics in debate is to use the strength of Phylogeny Tree, as invented from Evolution and as he had discussed in his YouTube video. Both old ID and Creation camp has no answer for that. Only from the new <id>...

So after talking to him many times in Non-Seq Show and Atheist Experience, I told him that I will rebut his Phylogeny Challenge. I did.
He was really afraid of me, for he could never answer the Phylogeny Answer that I had given him. I asked Jackson Wheat, the one who appeared on my first video on YouTube you uploaded to contact AronRa and fight me. He is really afraid of me.

But look, the challenge was for the old ID. But I will crush all explanations that will never use intelligence.
Why the need to crush others?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
If you will see the date of upload in YouTube, you will see that it was my first time talking or discussing science with AronRa. I thought that he was looking for the new discovered definition of intelligence, but I had found out that his goal was to crush me with his Phylogeny Challenge.

AronRa's tactics in debate is to use the strength of Phylogeny Tree, as invented from Evolution and as he had discussed in his YouTube video. Both old ID and Creation camp has no answer for that. Only from the new <id>...

So after talking to him many times in Non-Seq Show and Atheist Experience, I told him that I will rebut his Phylogeny Challenge. I did.
He was really afraid of me, for he could never answer the Phylogeny Answer that I had given him. I asked Jackson Wheat, the one who appeared on my first video on YouTube you uploaded to contact AronRa and fight me. He is really afraid of me.

But look, the challenge was for the old ID. But I will crush all explanations that will never use intelligence.
You claimed to have a clip. Now that appears to be a false claim.. Here is why they had pity on you:

AVLIWsdQFhysffkyOc12GU8xqig=.gif
 

Attachments

  • upload_2022-7-11_8-39-45.png
    upload_2022-7-11_8-39-45.png
    112.4 KB · Views: 4
Top