This is where the first amendment is needed. You seem to think that if a belief crosses a line you want imposed their beliefs don't matter.
This is a very bizarre characterisation of my position, despite my repeated attempts at explaining it. Again, you need to read my posts more carefully.
People are entitled to BELIEVE whatever they want. But that does not entitle them to use that belief as justification for using a BUSINESS to force that belief on others or deny equal treatment to groups on unjust terms.
I'm sorry were is declining to do what someone things is morally objectionable "forcing their beliefs on others"
It is. By definition, if you are someone who believes, for example, that interracial marriage is wrong, and you operate a business which plays a role in facilitating marriages, to deny that service to an interracial couple based purely on your personal belief is forcing that belief on them. You are essentially denying them their rights based on your personal belief.
You've been advocating for the wide use of government force to deny religious liberty in the public square.
Nope. That's yet another lie. I have very explicitly been talking about USING BUSINESS as a means to unfairly treat others. Religious liberty does not extend to public businesses.
I saw that's wrong and you are saying that's the business forcing their beliefs. And to top that off you called ME a lair????
Because you have repeatedly lied and continue to lie. Likely because you know that to deal with the facts would paint you in a very bad light. For example, you are constitutionally incapable of even talking about equal rights, racism of homophobia. Using analogies, you essentially compared the act of simply selling goods or providing services to these groups without discrimination to, amongst other things, an ammunition merchant selling bullets to be used in a mass shooting and a taxi driver being forced to drive someone "to a rape".
Boiled down to its core, your argument is that the simple act of being gay or being black is just as bad as committing a mass shooting or a rape.
If you recognize that this above statement is absurd, then you should understand why your wild and ridiculous analogies serve to paint you in a very poor light, and how your inability to deal with reality shows you up. You have made hyperboles like the above all the time. You have made claims about the negative impact of these laws which simply aren't true. And you even compared Christians to Jews in Nazi Germany.
You are the one not living in reality. I a trying, vainly, to bring you back down.
Now, you have a choice. Either dispense with the sophistry, the hyperbole, the mischaracterization and the emotional appeals and deal with this subject as a reasonable, intelligent person that I very confident you are, or you can continue to engage is all the above bad-faith nonsense and be an extremely, extremely poor advocate for the people you are trying to argue for.
Which do you choose?