Trailblazer
Veteran Member
Which goes completely against the teachings of their religion that they should 'love everyone.'It also ignores the fact that certain religions go out of their way to make life as painful as possible for non believers
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Which goes completely against the teachings of their religion that they should 'love everyone.'It also ignores the fact that certain religions go out of their way to make life as painful as possible for non believers
Oh brother. so we should censor scientifically gained knowledge because you think the bell shaped curve implies that devations are somehow wrong? (It doesn't.)And yet they really shouldn't be made because it the potentially for implying those outside of the norm are wrong, bad, lacking, etc. all the other fallacies I've heard. Such as this, where the implication can be those without cannot reach optimal happiness, or be as happy as those in religion.
IT IS A STATISTICAL FACT.Ah. What you really meant is that people who have a happy life statistically trend to being part of a religious community. It is not necessarily a factor.
We don't really know why.Why does it have to be a religious community?
Please cite any scientific studies that state that nonreligious people cannot reach optimal happiness or be as happy as those in religion.Oh brother. so we should censor scientifically gained knowledge because you think the bell shaped curve implies that devations are somehow wrong? (It doesn't.)
How does that contradict what I just said? Or are you agreeing with me with emphasis?IT IS A STATISTICAL FACT.
People who are active in religious congregations tend to be happier and more civically engaged than either religiously unaffiliated adults or inactive members of religious groups, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of survey data from the United States and more than two dozen other countries. Religion’s Relationship to Happiness, Civic Engagement and Health Around the WorldWhile it might be true that 'statistically speaking' most people are happier being part of a religious community, that does not mean that all people are happier. To claim that is the fallacy of hasty generalization and the fallacy of jumping to conclusions.
What is the scientific evidence that people are generally happier as part of a religious community?
but not everyone is part of the statistic.IT IS A STATISTICAL FACT.
It's a bell shaped curve my friend.Please cite any scientific studies that state that nonreligious people cannot reach optimal happiness or be as happy as those in religion.
If you accept that it is a statistical fact, then why are you arguing with me?How does that contradict what I just said? Or are you agreeing with me with emphasis?
That might be generally true but I would rather be unhappy than try to be someone I am not.People who are active in religious congregations tend to be happier and more civically engaged than either religiously unaffiliated adults or inactive members of religious groups, according to a new Pew Research Center analysis of survey data from the United States and more than two dozen other countries. Religion’s Relationship to Happiness, Civic Engagement and Health Around the World
These results have been repeated often enough that the latest studies simply assume the prior research to be true and go after more detailed analysis, such as do different religious communities have different levels of happiness.
when you speak of statistics, you are speaking of the bell shaped curve. sheesh, this is basic stuff.but not everyone is part of the statistic.
The bell shaped curve means there are people on either side of the curve.It's a bell shaped curve my friend.
I'm shocked at the number of responses that came from people who don't understand how statistics work.
Correction: Not everyone wants to be in the majority.when you speak of statistics, you are speaking of the bell shaped curve. sheesh, this is basic stuff.
No, I'm saying we shouldn't be inferring from it that being in a religious community is a component of a happy life. The data doesn't say that. It's shows us a correlation between the two, but we have far too many counter examples to call it a component of a happy life. Community, very much so. We have plenty of research to demonstrate our need for community. But we see lots of people who don't have religion and a lot of miserable people who do have religion. Some people seem driven to seek it while some seem apathetic towards it.Oh brother. so we should censor scientifically gained knowledge because you think the bell shaped curve implies that devations are somehow wrong? (It doesn't.)
And one of the factors of having a happy life is being part of a religious community.
It is not a factor in any unqualified sense. It is a factor in a significant section of the population. Moreover, it is not a necessary factor.If you accept that it is a statistical fact, then why are you arguing with me?
Obviously. So? What I said still holds true. Statistically speaking, members of religious communities are happier.The bell shaped curve means there are people on either side of the curve.
Not everyone wants to be part of the majority.
Do you really so disrespect science that you will not accept statistical truths?Correction: Not everyone wants to be in the majority.
I never made an unqualified, absolute claim. I made a statistical claim.It is not a factor in any unqualified sense. It is a factor in a significant section of the population. Moreover, it is not a necessary factor.
I never made an unqualified, absolute claim. I made a statistical claim.