Augustus
…
I'm sorry, but you're going to have to take your trip to la-la land by yourself. You have no frigging idea what you're saying.
Really? It is the generally accepted (secular) scholarly consensus, as you should know if you have studied it for 20 years.
Are you really insisting that all of this from the OP comes from somewhere other than post-Quran theological texts and the analysis of these (i.e. The same ones that talk about splitting the moon?)
Every word in the Qur'an was revealed by Mohamed between 610 and 632 CE, and is associated with whatever was happening at the time. Therefore, every verse has situational context,
For example, surah 2 is actually the 87th revealed and 12 years into Islam's evolution.
Many verses, although stated for a specific reason, are worded in such a way as to make a statement of fact or to issue a general, on-going command.
For example, verse 9:111 was revealed in late 630 after Mohamed had taken an army north to Tabuk in a failed attempt to battle, and thereby start a war with, the Byzantines. As usual, the Arab Bedouin tribes (Hypocrites) had refused to join Mohamed's army, and the Qur'an was taking them to task for the umpteenth time for their reluctance to see blood spilled (especially their own).
Where do you actually think this comes from?