• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

What is God?

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
'Why' is because the passing of time was needed for us to be born, and the good news of God's kingdom ..
.. Jesus, as Prince of Peace, will usher in global Peace on Earth among persons of goodwill.
That way your Prince of Peace will never come, because there will always be people yet to be born. What a silly argument! :(
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Does the concept of two or unicorn exist?
Yes, concepts are real, existing as brain states. But the 'contents' of a concept as such ─ here 'two' or 'unicorn' but equally 'the Empire State building' ─only exist as that brain state; meanwhile they may have a real referent, or an imaginary or purely conceptual one. In humans there's a strong correlation between concepts and language.
 
Last edited:

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
We get part of our morality from our evolution as gregarious primates ─ like of child protection and nurture, dislike of the one who harms, like of fairness and reciprocity, respect for authority, loyalty to the group and a sense of self-worth through self-denial. Evolution also adds our conscience and our capacity for empathy. The rest of our morality ─ the correct ways of acting towards other people depending on their sex, age, relationship, authority, and so on ─ we get from our upbringing, culture, education and experience.
.

I can agree one's conscience (compass guide) can be trained by supplimental upbringing, etc. as stated ^ above ^.
A person can choose to violate or listen to one's in-born conscience / innate knowledge.
People of the nations, who do Not have the Law, still do the things of the Law because of in-born conscience.
The more a person allows himself to be influenced by badness the more like Satan that person becomes.
Also, a damaged / abused conscience can become calloused like flesh seared by a hot branding iron.
I find one's morality / conscience did Not evolve in the animal realm.
No dog has empathy to apologizes for stealing another dog's bone.
Man was made in God's image whereas animals have instinct.
No animal can develop the personality of Jesus.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
And yet God isn’t stopping global warming which will ensure flooding.
Sure, God is stopping global warning because God will bring to ruin those ruining Earth - Revelation 11:18 B.
As Jeremiah 10:23 wrote that man can't direct his step, so this is why God is going to have Jesus step in.
The international declaring about God's kingdom (Daniel 2:44) is now done world wide as Jesus said - Matthew 24:14
Be Alert! Be on the watch for the ' final signal ', so to speak, as found at 1 Thessalonians 5:2-3.
When they, the powers in charge, are saying, " Peace and Security..." that rosy saying will lead people down the primrose path but Not to peace but to the coming great tribulation of Revelation 7:14,9.
So, we are being forewarned so that we can be forearmed that soon Jesus' Glory Time is at hand - Matthew 25:31-33
Global warming, etc.will stop because the ' sword-like executional words from Jesus' mouth ' will rid the Earth of the wicked.
No more wicked people equals No more global warming, etc. then, resilient Earth will bounce back.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
That way your Prince of Peace will never come, because there will always be people yet to be born. What a silly argument! :(
Please notice Matthew 24:14 because it does Not say to each and every single person, but that the good news of God's Kingdom (Daniel 2:44) would be proclaimed to the 'nations'.
It is the 'international' declaring about God's Kingdom as it is done today.
Parents are responsible for minor children - 1 Corinthians 7:14
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I can agree one's conscience (compass guide) can be trained by supplimental upbringing, etc. as stated ^ above ^.
But as I stated above, and as research has shown, children all over the world are born with the moral instincts I listed; and with a conscience, and with the capacity for empathy. Exceptions like psychopathy are exactly that, exceptions.
A person can choose to violate or listen to one's in-born conscience / innate knowledge.
But that has nothing to do with religion, except religion viewed as a kind of regimentation.
People of the nations, who do Not have the Law, still do the things of the Law because of in-born conscience.
Other way round. The bits of the law that reflect the list I gave you are there because their writers had instincts of that kind. Which is why decency and kindness to strangers and so on are found in all societies in one form or another regardless of religion.
The more a person allows himself to be influenced by badness the more like Satan that person becomes.
Have you traced the history of Satan through the bible? He begins as one of the courtiers in Yahweh's court, and enters into the appalling bet which Yahweh makes with him at the start of Job. It's only later that he gets pressed into the roll of archvillain, a particularly Christian notion that even pretends to identify him with the (actually blameless) snake in the Garden story. In other words, a thoroughly human invention of a convenient embodiment of what the church doesn't like.
I find one's morality / conscience did Not evolve in the animal realm.
Correct me if I'm wrong but you appear to have read none of the research.
No dog has empathy to apologizes for stealing another dog's bone.
In canine packs the rights to the bone are determined by the peck order, and the 'apology' takes the form of submission to the higher-ranked canine; or else a fight to determine a new rank. And of course child protection and nurture are found throughout nature, and with mammals and birds are with very few exceptions essential.
Man was made in God's image whereas animals have instinct.
So you say God is a being like a human male, with Middle Eastern features, and humans, being in [his] image should engage in invasive wars, massacre populations, sacrifice their firstborn sons to [him] and accept human sacrifices from lower down the chain, should engage in murderous religious intolerance, trade in slaves, practice polygamy, demean the status of women, and so on as the bible says?

That's certainly not my view.
 

Sheldon

Veteran Member
No dog has empathy to apologizes for stealing another dog's bone.

Why would they, their empathy would necessarily be part of their evolution, not ours.

I find one's morality / conscience did Not evolve in the animal realm.

All animals that have evolved to live in societal groups have necessarily learned to recognise "right" and "wrong" behaviours among that group, the group couldn't cohesively exist otherwise.

Man was made in God's image whereas animals have instinct.

Humans have instincts, and it is an objective fact that we evolved like all other living things, to deny this is no less absurd than denying the rotundity of the earth.

No animal can develop the personality of Jesus.

Well I don't know if Jesus even existed as an historical figure, but even if he did I don't believe any of the supernatural claims made about the character. So that statement doesn't really mean anything to me, sorry.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
But as I stated above, and as research has shown, children all over the world are born with the moral instincts I listed; and with a conscience, and with the capacity for empathy.
While I appreciate your post, I will differ on one point. A new-born is a selfish creature. Children learn by the example of their parents and elders. No God involved in this process. Children are like kneaded soil. They can be given any desired shape. Perhaps DNA also plays some role.
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
While I appreciate your post, I will differ on one point. A new-born is a selfish creature. Children learn by the example of their parents and elders. No God involved in this process. Children are like kneaded soil. They can be given any desired shape. Perhaps DNA also plays some role.
Children are not a subject about which I'm wholly ignorant. They enter the outer world helpless but for a long list of instinctive behaviors which they've / we've evolved because they're good for survival ─ like right from the very start breathing, moving their digits and limbs, turning the head to look (a learning process but equipped with an instinct to look at faces), making noises (which elicit instinctive responses in carers), and shortly, how to suckle, and swallow. I wouldn't class any of that as 'selfish' so I guess you have other, more advanced and interactive behaviors in mind. We all love to get our own way, and we all have to learn the most productive ways to deal with others in the process.

So on my part, any agreement with your statement is at best half-hearted.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
Sure, God is stopping global warning because God will bring to ruin those ruining Earth - Revelation 11:18 B.
[...]
Global warming, etc.will stop because the ' sword-like executional words from Jesus' mouth ' will rid the Earth of the wicked.
No more wicked people equals No more global warming, etc. then, resilient Earth will bounce back.
You agreed with me that god is purely spiritual, now you predict that it will influence the physical world. I.e. when we can measure the forces preventing global warming, we'd have evidence for a god, i.e. a not purely spiritual being.
You'll have to decide if you believe in a magic wielding, invisible sky daddy or in a scientifically undetectable spiritual being - or you have to explain how both can be the same at the same time.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Children are not a subject about which I'm wholly ignorant. They enter the outer world helpless but for a long list of instinctive behaviors which they've / we've evolved because they're good for survival ─ like right from the very start breathing, moving their digits and limbs, turning the head to look (a learning process but equipped with an instinct to look at faces), making noises (which elicit instinctive responses in carers), and shortly, how to suckle, and swallow. I wouldn't class any of that as 'selfish' so I guess you have other, more advanced and interactive behaviors in mind. We all love to get our own way, and we all have to learn the most productive ways to deal with others in the process.

So on my part, any agreement with your statement is at best half-hearted.
No problem there. I don't blame a new-born. Evolution has made it selfish. It tries to do what is best for itself, otherwise, it cries, demands what is needed by it.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
................
So you say God is a being like a human male, with Middle Eastern features, and humans, being in [his] image should engage in invasive wars, massacre populations, sacrifice their firstborn sons to [him] and accept human sacrifices from lower down the chain, should engage in murderous religious intolerance, trade in slaves, practice polygamy, demean the status of women, and so on as the bible says?...............

Animals go by instinct. Unless damaged, humans come created with an inborn conscience.
No, God does Not have physical features.
Israel was never in the slave-trade business like the American South.
Polygamy was allowed for a while so that No woman would be without a husband to care for her.
Please notice Jeremiah 32:34 ; 2 Chronicles 28:3 because God did Not want firstborn sons sacrificed.
It was un-faithful people and non-Jews who practised child sacrifice as food for the idol gods - Ezekiel 23:37
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Jesus to Peter: Get thee behind me, Satan.
Remember Satan is Not a name. We don't know sinner Satan's name.
I think Satan stands for being a resister.
The Devil as slanderer.
As Serpent meaning destroyer.
and Satan the Dragon as: destroyer.
So, Jesus was telling Peter by what he was saying that Peter was resisting God's purpose for Jesus.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
You agreed with me that god is purely spiritual, now you predict that it will influence the physical world. I.e. when we can measure the forces preventing global warming, we'd have evidence for a god, i.e. a not purely spiritual being.
You'll have to decide if you believe in a magic wielding, invisible sky daddy or in a scientifically undetectable spiritual being - or you have to explain how both can be the same at the same time.
What forces preventing global warming _______________
Even back in the year 2,000 science was already saying about how badly the oceans were polluted.
Global warming, diseases (pestilences - Luke 21:11) are problems now too BIG for mankind to now solve.
Jesus was Not invisible when he as God's Son was on Earth.
Jesus explained and expounded Scripture for us, so that we are forewarned and forearmed as to what is coming.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
While I appreciate your post, I will differ on one point. A new-born is a selfish creature. Children learn by the example of their parents and elders. No God involved in this process. Children are like kneaded soil. They can be given any desired shape. Perhaps DNA also plays some role.
To me an inborn conscience plays a role, so unless damaged, humans come equipped with an inborn conscience.
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
Animals go by instinct. Unless damaged, humans come created with an inborn conscience.
And not just a conscience, not just a capacity for empathy, but with the actual moral tendencies I listed for you, regardless of race, nation or creed.
No, God does Not have physical features.
Israel was never in the slave-trade business like the American South.
The American South (and British Jamaica, and so much more) are examples of slavery, and ancient societies, including the Hebrew, were examples of slavery and a slave economy as well.
Please notice Jeremiah 32:34 ; 2 Chronicles 28:3 because God did Not want firstborn sons sacrificed.
The matter is ambiguous. For example,

Exodus 22:29 You must give me the firstborn of your sons. 30 Do the same with your cattle and your sheep. Let them stay with their mothers for seven days, but give them to me on the eighth day.

And of course Jephthah had a daughter, not a son, whom he sacrificed to God in return for military success: Judges 11:29-39.

And in 2 Samuel 21 God relieved the famine, being satisfied with the death by impalement of the 'seven sons of Saul' before [him].

And the NT is all about God sacrificing [his] son to [him]self. (Why, I've never quite understood, but it's apparently centrally relevant.)
 
Top