I think this was supposed to somehow "get my goat" or something... but the fact is, I am human. Did you think I was trying to be something more? What might that have been in your estimation, Mikkel? And OF COURSE my glee at you having been riled up is not "objective" in any sense. Have I been stating otherwise? I am, however, sharing my subjective experience with you... so there is that.
You mean, you were actually trying for answers to the below items 2 other times? Why don't I remember this?
Just simply "remove religion" and no... I don't think so. However, remove the impetus for claiming religion is "true", such that everyone is instead saavy enough to understand the subjectivity, non-falsifiability and general tomfoolery that is taking up a position without evidential warrant, and yes, indeed, I think we would have a "better" place on our hands. And that's "better" according to nearly everyone, subjectively.
What an odd question. As if there must be a "replacement." I want people to think for themselves, rather than rely on what they are told for items without evidence backing them, if I must provide an answer. And when I say "evidence" (because we all know what a problem that word is for you), I mean using the same critical nature one would expect a person to use when I make an unevidenced claim like "your mother is an alien." "Evidence" would be whatever I needed to provide to that person to compel them to believe me on that claim. If you don't have that level of backing for claims to which people would attach importance of a perspective-altering nature, then you don't have anything, and should probably just promptly close your mouth.
There are plenty of claims made of a subjective nature that all sorts of people are trying to get you to accept. For example, my sister and brother are constantly feuding. They will each call me and give wildly varying accounts of what went on that has them both in their current tizzies. To the point that I cannot, in good conscience, accept anything either of them tell me at face value. I am left in the precarious position of trying to "make up" my own account of the goings on that led them to their current displeasure with one another. Usually vague, always judgmental, and extremely unflattering to either of them. It is subjectivity all over the place. However, even I understand that there is still an objective account of "what actually happened." None of us may either know it (in my case) or be willing to admit to it (in my sister and brother's cases), but it is something nonetheless. The real truth of what went on. It is, and cannot be denied.