QuestioningMind
Well-Known Member
Yes, the article says that there are those that try to abuse the concept. It explains why it is not correct. Not fully, but nice cherry picking. I am not the one with a reading comprehension problem. Look at the history of the term. That gives you a good indication of its meaning and usage.
Show me. Provide the quote from the article that states the original definition the article provided for creationism is something that people use to try and abuse the concept.
Again READ THE WORDS: Creationism in this more restricted sense entails a number of beliefs.
So the article itself states that YOUR definition is a MORE RESTRICTED definition, which means there is a definition BEYOND the restricted definition you insist is the only definition. Do you honestly not comprehend something so basic or are you just trying to be obtuse?