You apparently consider comparing pagan myths to be evidence while waving away the state record of Israel, that was very very very carefully kept and passed down.
Source these "state records" that have anything to do with proving gods are real.
The only thing passed down was the OT which after the Persian invasion contained Persian concepts.
Zoroaster was thus the first to teach the doctrines of an individual judgment, Heaven and Hell, the future resurrection of the body, the general Last Judgment, and life everlasting for the reunited soul and body. These doctrines were to become familiar articles of faith to much of mankind, through borrowings by Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
[30]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_mythology
Historians can say whatever they like.
And in this case they demonstrate evidence that Christianity is a harmless superstition.
Source? (post the relevant bit using the link only as a reference). How a black hole 'should appear' really doesn't say a lot.
How Scientists Captured the First Image of a Black Hole - Teachable Moments | NASA/JPL Edu
I already exposed your claims as absolutely belief based. That is why you will not be able to cite any claim of yours here that is not belief based.
You did not. I listed the microwave background, a prediction of the BB model. Your idea hasn't been sourced, proven, demonstrated to be possible or anything else. So you have shown nothing. You have not shown why the microwave background is a belief. You just said light might "act differently in the fishbowl".
again, source your idea. Link to a paper showing it's possible. Or continue to be some random non-science person claiming a nonsense idea is real.
Sure you don't have to prove your idea. Just be wrong and soak in all that wrong-ness.
There was no billion years ago in this universe, so whatever you think light shows you is internal belief based.
Until you demonstrate why radiometric dating is wrong then I'm still right. Are you even going to try?
How is anything 'on track'? You mean a pattern of increased redshift...or?
Depending on the age of the universe being looked at different structures will be in place. Quasars were active in the early universe. There were less galaxy clusters, more nebula and so on.
Source? Looking at one SN, for example, that was seen from earth, we see this..
"Astronomers have discovered traces of a star that went
supernova about 140 years ago as viewed from Earth*, around the time of the U.S. Civil War and the publication of Charles Darwin's
The Origin of Species. The expanding debris cloud, or remnant, known as G1.9+0.3, lies near the center of the Milky Way, about 25,000 light-years from Earth."
Remains of 140-Year-Old Supernova Discovered
So they say the distance is 25,000 ly away. Then they say we saw the light 140 years ago. Ha.
Facepalm....oops, you forgot to read the correction at the end...."
*Clarification (5/15/08): The supernova marked by G1.9+0.3 would have occurred 25,000 years ago, but because of its distance from Earth, the supernova's light would have first become visible 140 years ago."
How would paper show us that time is any way at all in the unknown distant universe?
You have an idea with zero science to back it up. You KEEP ASKING FOR SOURCES on science other people posted. So SOURCE YOUR SCIENCE. If there is no paper then WHY DO YOU THINK IT'S CORRECT?????
Or..your idea is just crank and you've demonstrated nothing.
Do show us how you chart the speed of anything at all in deep space? Ha. Seriously?
Quantum mechanics has predictive power. We know how fast particles travel and their weight:
"Indeed most of the cosmic muons have a high energy and travel at speeds close to 300 000 km / second the
speed of light in vacuum."
Strawman. The issue in deep space is space and time, not laws. Where is your proof space and time are the same?
No asking for a source is not a "strawman"? Space follows the laws of general relativity. Special and general relativity cover time dillation and special relativity deals with 4-vector (depending on velocity your local time frame slows or speeds up. All of these things follow laws that work here and are responsible for many phenomenon in the universe. We see things operating the same in the solar system as well as deep space.
There is no reason to think SR/GR and spacetime changes in deep space.
You need a theory, a reason to even suggest the idea. Space and time follow laws the same as everything else.
Prehaps you did not realize this.
No one asked about 'laws' in the far universe.
Yes, a black hole happens because of the laws of GR. Relativity which also effects time and space.
Foolish misrepresentations of what God's word actually says.
Comparative mythology provides historical and cross-cultural perspectives for
Jewish mythology. Both sources behind the Genesis creation narrative borrowed themes from
Mesopotamian mythology,
[19][20] but adapted them to
their belief in one God,
[2] establishing a monotheistic creation in opposition to the polytheistic creation myth of
ancient Israel's neighbors.
[21][22]
The universe as conceived by the ancient Hebrews comprised a
flat disk-shaped earth with the heavens above and
Sheol, the underworld of the dead, below.
[27] These three were surrounded by a watery "ocean" of chaos, protected by the
firmament, a transparent but solid dome resting on the mountains which ringed the earth.
[27] Noah's three-deck ark represents this three-level Hebrew cosmos in miniature: heavens, earth, and waters beneath.
No. For C to exist in far space we need time to be the same. Fishbowl spacetime is not relative at all!
Where is your source that time isn't the same.
We see objects in the far universe that show time acting as it should. Pulsars are calculated to spin so many time per second. We see this.
If you now say "no we see the light when it reaches us"....then source a paper that explains how light can possible change and why it would change in the local solar system and what is different about our solar system such that when light gets to it it changes.
Source all these ideas with evidence and predictions we can test. OR just be wrong.
Black holes follow GR exactly,pulsars, neutron stars, star formation, galaxy clusters
In the fishbowl, maybe. But you have no substancial velocity here anyhow so why mention it in relation to time in the far universe?
SR predicts a slowing of time we can test here on earth using atomic clocks and travel on airplanes. GPS also allows us to test the predicted errors in the gravity well of Earth and the time dillation. Everything matches exactly.
Explain why you think relativity extends beyond the area of the solar system, exactly? Gravitational lensing? Ha. You better have more than that.
G relativity governs blkack hole formation, neutron stars, supernova, star formation, galaxy formation, galaxy clusters, superclusters, and more
You admit a superficial understanding then. OK. The issue is not whether we can observe how creation works. The issue is whether we know how and why. Science doesn't as you admit when you talk of not knowing on a deep level!
Now we have a real strawman.
Delirious fantasy. There is literally not a single thing that works because of origin claims of so called science. Nothing. Zero. Literally nothing at all. No technology. No invention. No machine. No anything anywhere ever.
You belief system tries to take credit for events we see and stars etc. Pathetic really. You do not even know the distances to objects, or the sizes, or how much gravity is actually existing, etc etc etc.
I keep answering the same questions over and over and you ignore the answers and ask again? I linked to an article explaining how QM is used to make computers work. Already explained how we judge distances.
Here is the surface gravity of the sun and planets. Can you do your own research and find out how we know this or do you expect me to continue holding your hand this entire time?
Can you get anything done on your own? Are you capable of finding answers or do I have to keep coddling you and re-answering 30+ questions every post, most of them the same questions?