The Absolute Theory of Everything .

[ANEWDAWN]

At some point, we have to learn to simply ignore nonsense. Such a tremendous waste of effort and intellect trying to argue with people who can't think clearly in the first place.

Quite clearly you haven't a clue about absolute physics and physical truths .

If you can answer how to remove the space from the glass , even in imagination , I'll concede .

I already know it is impossible to remove the space from within the glass .

 

[Dan From Smithville]

You should think, if a human did not exist, then nor would science, as a true and 100 per cent correct self realization.

If a male infers that out of space created him, then he would also be implying that if he personally began in space.....when he is inferring to gas space.....then he would be trying to put self back into space, which is to remove gas space...so he could gain what he says is his owned absolute theory....as to be owned by a human, living as a human, thinking as a human, for that human status.

Why ownership of trying to give self the states that are natural in their owned natural forms is why human science destroys life on Earth...by trying to give the human wanting what they conceptualize its actuality.

Think not I that science is human. Exist it could were it roses of another planet breathing it into use.

Science destroy? Nah I say. As wrenches on cars do not decide on which they work. Tis but a tool.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Quite clearly you haven't a clue about absolute physics and physical truths .

If you can answer how to remove the space from the glass , even in imagination , I'll concede .

I already know it is impossible to remove the space from within the glass .

Fill it with beer.

 

[ANEWDAWN]

Fill it with beer.

The space remains , the air is pushed out of the glass by the liquid but the space remains unaltered .

There is no loner any room in the glass when the liquid is in it .

Don't mistake room space for space .

P.s Slide your glass of beer to the side , where your glass was you will see the space remains . Slide it back and the space is back inside the glass .

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Nothing is an ideal that says what exists can be removed to not exist.

For a human does not exist in any condition of nothing....we exist with everything.

Therefore when a human discusses nothing, they mean it, as a thought...to gain it.

Which implies destruction comes about and change comes about by the thought of nothing.

For as said for a thinking mind to say that it can shift mass in a want of human science, the mind first places a thought to own space, to a mind it is nothing.

Then within the nothing he would idealise the shifting of mass that would be a destruction action.

Human conscious awareness thought those thoughts whilst living inside of a gas massed body, that owned space, gas space. Mass as a gas plus radiation but an ability to move through the mass by the state of gas existence.

Which is a self bio owned status that does not belong to any other form of mass.

Radiation metal advised the seeking science mind that it came into the gas body from outside of it, so outside mass could invade the space of a gas....where his science ideas came from.

Consciousness therefore idealized space inside of a gas mass...which is not relative to space itself.

Do you even know what you are saying? Does anything you write mean anything to you? Because it is absolutely devoid of meaning to any person trying to interpret what you write by assuming you understand the English language.

I honestly suspect that you are in some sort of dissociative (or fugue) state, and have little apprehension of what you're doing.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

The space remains , the air is pushed out of the glass by the liquid but the space remains unaltered .

There is no loner any room in the glass when the liquid is in it .

Don't mistake room space for space .

P.s Slide your glass of beer to the side , where your glass was you will see the space remains . Slide it back and the space is back inside the glass .

But there is beer!

What about cake?

I like cake.

 

[Evangelicalhumanist]

Quite clearly you haven't a clue about absolute physics and physical truths .

If you can answer how to remove the space from the glass , even in imagination , I'll concede .

I already know it is impossible to remove the space from within the glass .

That's because you are totally ignorant of the meaning of the word "space" that you throw around so casually. What the glass has to do with it is purely rubbish.

You might want to consider this: it may just be the case that for absolutely nothing to exist is impossible. This may be a brute fact of reality

 

[Subduction Zone]

You removed it in your imagination... but not in reality.

Just as the quanta were removed by imagination.

 

[rational experiences]

Do you even know what you are saying? Does anything you write mean anything to you? Because it is absolutely devoid of meaning to any person trying to interpret what you write by assuming you understand the English language.

I honestly suspect that you are in some sort of dissociative (or fugue) state, and have little apprehension of what you're doing.

Why, your answer would more than likely claim, just because I think as a self that only science is right...because I say so....male egotism.

So if a human contests what it knows naturally and says to that male, if you were not alive, and owner of a human life, then science would not exist would it.

As a very simple conscious assertion to get the thinker to relate exactly what needs to be related....you lie to self about conditions in science.

You were living in a natural atmospheric gas space conditions, for gas fills in empty space, but it does not take up space.

So already your male mind psyche is told, even with radiation metal mass within it...there is a huge space of fullness empty.

You tried to preach that creation came from nothing...yet you were alive, living as a human male life thinking, saying your thoughts mind, were over matter, which is a statement to say in egotism, my thoughts will overcome the presence of matter.

So when a human says do you realize you were naturally and totally supported by the whole cosmological and Universal theme......cold and natural...and then you chose to change it by machine reaction.

And then you get a whole lot of lying male egotistical retorts.

When you say to that male...you see and know that metallic radiation mass is inside of a gas atmosphere, yet it is a gas atmosphere.

You do a maths and mass radiation theory about mass, as a huge body, knowing that the only physical manipulation of mass is a male on Earth manipulating its mass.

You claim you want a small amount of radiation resource which is electricity as compared to mass itself...so then go about removing the huge mass of radiation mass to get a sink hole and then say, yes that should about equal electricity in a radiation condition in a hole.

Isn't that what you really achieved, in claiming I absolutely know everything?

Seeing you already were living naturally with everything, in the state natural first!

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Do you even know what you are saying? Does anything you write mean anything to you? Because it is absolutely devoid of meaning to any person trying to interpret what you write by assuming you understand the English language.

I honestly suspect that you are in some sort of dissociative (or fugue) state, and have little apprehension of what you're doing.

It was a little confusing at first, but after beer and cake, I understood everything.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Just as the quanta were removed by imagination.

I sort of l ost interest in this thread. Can you tell?

 

[rational experiences]

It was a little confusing at first, but after beer and cake, I understood everything.

Does a scientist realize that first he is living owning a natural life just as a human and a male without thinking for science?

For that is all he owns personally as each self.

A male says I learn, and lessons only come in what his claim is as self sacrifice...how I learn, and then said, but self was saved in that sacrifice.....but science was not saved.

Today you want only science to be saved by what you claim saved your life....is an oxy moron isn't it?

How about the real defined natural self presence, and natural history, first I was already living, naturally in a whole gas mass atmospheric body and then I chose to forcibly change it by heated radiation...as the only force a science self owns to force change to natural history and stop lying to self about not being here, first as a male but existing as some form of God self not human.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Does a scientist realize that first he is living owning a natural life just as a human and a male without thinking for science?

For that is all he owns personally as each self.

A male says I learn, and lessons only come in what his claim is as self sacrifice...how I learn, and then said, but self was saved in that sacrifice.....but science was not saved.

Today you want only science to be saved by what you claim saved your life....is an oxy moron isn't it?

How about the real defined natural self presence, and natural history, first I was already living, naturally in a whole gas mass atmospheric body and then I chose to forcibly change it by heated radiation...as the only force a science self owns to force change to natural history and stop lying to self about not being here, first as a male but existing as some form of God self not human.

Despite my previous post, I have no idea what you are trying to say. Is it a language issue? Why the fixation with males? Are you saying that females cannot do science? That is incorrect. What do you mean by 'owning'? It is all unclear.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

Do you even know what you are saying? Does anything you write mean anything to you? Because it is absolutely devoid of meaning to any person trying to interpret what you write by assuming you understand the English language.

I honestly suspect that you are in some sort of dissociative (or fugue) state, and have little apprehension of what you're doing.

I know I will probably be mad at myself for responding to @rational experiences but I haven't been feeling well and I am bored.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I sort of l ost interest in this thread. Can you tell?

I found your posts quite informative, now I do not know of any cakes,but I do know of beer volcanoes.

 

[rational experiences]

Despite my previous post, I have no idea what you are trying to say. Is it a language issue? Why the fixation with males? Are you saying that females cannot do science? That is incorrect. What do you mean by 'owning'? It is all unclear.

How does science exist in reality if a human male, a natural self does not exist, as a living human? You are just a human and only own yourself, which is proven by human acts, medical science is correct. 2 human being parents, sex, sperm, ovary growth into baby, live and then die....which is not any other form of science.

In all of those statements....you, the self are not either of the other 2 living bodies in self conditions, able to walk around inside of a gas mass as the bodies doing it relatively. So you do not personally own any other form of ownership, for you, the self, live and die....we know how you get created by sex....and you die as a human.

All relative self information, as the original self. You are not any original self anywhere else or in any other condition.

So humans who have the experience of looking at life from not being the self know the real detail. For a self that claims science other humans can say, but when you die, if you did not live, then the scientist would own no claim in natural life.

A human can look at someone speaking human words only as the human self is living in their own human self beliefs.....and see them die/be destroyed.

So the non science believer says....I look at animals and know that I am not an animal.

Animals having sex in my life presence give birth to animal babies in my life presence as real science information.

For the self in experience owns conscious living awareness about self for 100 years of life....natural.

When a human dies, the animals still exist without that human living. The animals that were identified as living before any self, still are living after any self by the act of animal owned sex...for animal babies.

The same is witnessed as a human before a human being life is owned, as a self and a baby and after the human being baby to adult self dies.....being science information, real information...of before a human exists and after the human does not exist.

And you think you own an argument to the contrary?

Why we live sharing human information.

You would say, if I do no exist living as a human being and a male then science, as invented by that male as a living human historically would not be practiced...therefore science is not real or reality, nor is it owner of any of the other natural bodies in creation that he discusses.

How is that not a self realized male ideal?

 

[Dan From Smithville]

How does science exist in reality if a human male, a natural self does not exist, as a living human? You are just a human and only own yourself, which is proven by human acts, medical science is correct. 2 human being parents, sex, sperm, ovary growth into baby, live and then die....which is not any other form of science.

In all of those statements....you, the self are not either of the other 2 living bodies in self conditions, able to walk around inside of a gas mass as the bodies doing it relatively. So you do not personally own any other form of ownership, for you, the self, live and die....we know how you get created by sex....and you die as a human.

All relative self information, as the original self. You are not any original self anywhere else or in any other condition.

So humans who have the experience of looking at life from not being the self know the real detail. For a self that claims science other humans can say, but when you die, if you did not live, then the scientist would own no claim in natural life.

A human can look at someone speaking human words only as the human self is living in their own human self beliefs.....and see them die/be destroyed.

So the non science believer says....I look at animals and know that I am not an animal.

Animals having sex in my life presence give birth to animal babies in my life presence as real science information.

For the self in experience owns conscious living awareness about self for 100 years of life....natural.

When a human dies, the animals still exist without that human living. The animals that were identified as living before any self, still are living after any self by the act of animal owned sex...for animal babies.

The same is witnessed as a human before a human being life is owned, as a self and a baby and after the human being baby to adult self dies.....being science information, real information...of before a human exists and after the human does not exist.

And you think you own an argument to the contrary?

Why we live sharing human information.

You would say, if I do no exist living as a human being and a male then science, as invented by that male as a living human historically would not be practiced...therefore science is not real or reality, nor is it owner of any of the other natural bodies in creation that he discusses.

How is that not a self realized male ideal?

Well this is an improvement, but I am still unclear what the point of all this is.

We only know science as a human pursuit, but that does not exclude the possibility of it being a pursuit by other possible intelligences. That males dominated, though not exclusively, in the early development of science is a cultural artifact and does not reflect the ability of human females in understanding or performing science.

 

[ANEWDAWN]

Do you even know what you are saying? Does anything you write mean anything to you? Because it is absolutely devoid of meaning to any person trying to interpret what you write by assuming you understand the English language.

I honestly suspect that you are in some sort of dissociative (or fugue) state, and have little apprehension of what you're doing.

Interestingly enough you do not represent every person . May I suggest you take a course in basic cognition skills if you do not understand some very simple physics .

The proof as they say is in the pudding and your futile ''attack'' to undermine my explanation isn't unnoticed by readers of the thread who understood the very simple explanation given .

No doubt you fear the future of this thread and the revelations that will be given such as demonstrating that light has a speed of 0 .

 

[MonkeyFire]

Nothing has no definition and is impossible, where as nature, reality, and all things do not include nihilism, so anything from dis-belief, to evil, and suffering dont factor out well. Thus creating perfection.

 

[Dan From Smithville]

I found your posts quite informative, now I do not know of any cakes,but I do know of beer volcanoes.

Beer volcanoes? Tell me more.