Salvador
RF's Swedenborgian
You are using PeerJ to report on PeerJ. Do you not see a problem with this?
Well, I suppose they could possibly maybe misrepresent the impact factor details of the published articles in order to attract more business than if they'd honestly truthfully represented the actual impact factor details of their published articles. Right?
Good news! This link from a source that's seemingly independent of PeerJ does seem to be in agreement with what PeerJ has itself reported for the impact factor details of their published articles.
Impact Factor of PeerJ - 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010