How would you tell the difference between God, your own subconscious, and Satan?I am waiting for God telling it to me.
Tom
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How would you tell the difference between God, your own subconscious, and Satan?I am waiting for God telling it to me.
I am waiting for God telling it to me.
I just told you that HIV/AIDS is not a gay related problem, but a promiscuity problem. You conceded that that might be right.We do not know gay behavior 3000 years ago, but we can assume that gays had more or less similar gay related illnesses as today. It was a grave problem then.
I think it's kind of logical... There is no vagina, so if there is going to be intercourse, there's only one other place to... well... you know.
But, it wouldn't surprise me that anal sex might be just as prevalent among heterosexual couples as it is among gay couples.
I did brush off it, my opinion of spiritual matters is largely individual. I stick to my .He told me he can't reach you because you closed off your heart when you created an image of god to your liking and as a result you are actually worshipping a false idol.
You first need to accept the real Lord into your heart and then he'll reveal to you the beauty of gay sex.
(ps: eventhough it's sarcasm, I find it really disturbing how easy it is to brush of any and all opinions with such faith based "arguments")
I just told you that HIV/AIDS is not a gay related problem, but a promiscuity problem. You conceded that that might be right.
(Also FYI millions of heterosexuals have died due to STDs before we humans even interacted with HIV. It’s literally a modern disease.)
You have proven nothing other than people should practice safe sex.
And given historical records of gay behaviour in the ancient world, like Sparta, you are incorrect. Though the definitions would have certainly differed to our modern understandings of sexual orientation.
Once somebody has divorced their beliefs and worldview from evidence and reason, they might wind up believing almost anything.
Tom
It is not a coincidence that the religiously inclined are also more likely to believe conspiracy theories.
That's something that amazes me... why the first thing people think of about homosexuality is "teh buttsecks". I daresay it's not even the foremost or favorite sexual activity. I think they need to stop watching xtube and tumblr videos.
I think it's the dying leftovers of the old homophobic canards about gay men being dangerous sexual predators who prowl around looking to turn people gay. Hypersexualizing us makes it easier to say unkind things about us.
Well, it's just common sense to not feed wild bears You also have to be on guard for traps along the way, too.
Well, it's just common sense to not feed wild bears You also have to be on guard for traps along the way, too.
A dishonest remark, and there are no personal attacks, LOL.I didn't say that they were, you do know that don't you?
Off course you do... you just thought you could dodge the actual point being made by making that dishonest remark.
But you know what both hypothesis and theories are? Explanatory models.
Hypothesis that are well tested, are promoted to theory.
It's not a personal attack. It's rather taking your statement and driving it home by pointing out the implications and falsehoods contained therein.
At no point has there been an attack on your person. Pointing out that such language is common in all of scientific analysis and conclusion forming, is directly related to the point you were trying to make and not related to your person at all.
Facts don't require such language.
Explanations and conclusions drawn from a set of facts, does.
Uh, it is usually atheists who post on the issue, apparently they are obsessed by it, not us.Just so you know....
I actually just asked God.
He says you got it all wrong. He told me gay sex is just fine and that he doesn't get his followers' obsession with gay sex... He says that it's the love between two people you should focus on, because that's the beauty of a relationship, while the sex is just one part of it - the physical expression of that love.
And he says that the love between two man is just as beautifull as the love between 2 woman or between a man and a woman.
Isn't that awesome?
Glad we finally settled that. Good thing you adviced me to ask God about it. Who knows how many more centuries of cruel homophobia those beautifull gay people would have had to endure if I hadn't asked God for his opinion.
After all, I asked God and he responded. Surely you will now change opinions?
LOL. Then God created serial killers, the Russian gulags, AIDS, car accidents, and house fires.You seem to think that if you assert that God believes a thing, then it is true.
You seem to know a lot about the musings and mind of a God which you cannot demonstrate the existence of.
If God created all there is, as you assert, then that God created homosexuality. There's no way around that. It doesn't matter what anybody else thinks about natural processes or whatever. That's just a diversionary tactic on your part.
It's not a promiscuity problem, either. It's a blood-borne illness, primarily, and sexual activity is just one way to get it. You can be a virgin and have sex with one person and get it.I just told you that HIV/AIDS is not a gay related problem, but a promiscuity problem.
Nonsense, and nonsense. I accept scientific papers as what their authors say they are.There are means of controlling the infection today. And there are many ways to get HIV. I'm sure you understand this, but conveniently ignore this so that you can pass all the blame on gays and feel justified in doing it.
Then you accept no scientific paper. You depend on journalists who use that definite language; so you depend on the wrong source for your information.
Well I do enjoy a good Queen song.
LOL. Then God created serial killers, the Russian gulags, AIDS, car accidents, and house fires.
Since you are unfamiliar with the theological facts of the matter, and apparently are unfamiliar with the Bible....................I can say with total confidence that you don´t know what you are talking about.