ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
What is your point? What do you think the article is saying?I think you missed my point, in my quote from the article.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What is your point? What do you think the article is saying?I think you missed my point, in my quote from the article.
I did not falsely accused you. Nor did I deflect.Accusing me falsely, and deflecting with ad hom fallacies, does not provide evidence for the belief in common descent. I will not constantly point this out, but will remind everyone from time to time.
You can choose the role of spoiler and heckler, or you can choose a path of knowledge and scientific inquiry.
Yes, but what about the EVE GENE?????It was in the very post you quoted. Do we have to play this game?
The FACTS are:
1. The half life of the earth's magnetic field has been calculated, based on measurements over the last couple of centuries.
From wiki:
Barnes claimed to calculate the half-life of the earth's magnetic field as approximately 1,400 years based on 130 years of empirical data.
2. 'Flipping magnetic fields!' is speculative, unevidenced, and promoted as a cop out for the REAL PROBLEM of the earth's measured half life.
I must have missed where you explained how your deity transformed silicates into thousands of bio-organic compounds. Do you have a link?What testing was done about unicells emerging about 4 billion years ago? What evidence is there?
The oldest verified fossils are evidence for life is 3.4 billion year old bacterial fossils. Some research indicates that life may have formed earlier, but there are questions around that. I do not know when life first arose, but I accept the evidence that we do have on how old some of it is.
It is so weird - apparently, only OTHER people have to present evidence for their views.What is the evidence for creation that is described in Genesis?
And he never did....Cool, but this is not what I asked -
Take a gander and show us examples of his work that favor ID or creation or whatever, and be sure to explain how it supports your position.
I did not falsely accused you. Nor did I deflect.
please stop lying
You have a point in this? Or just heckling, as usual?Yes, but what about the EVE GENE?????
Personal attacks is all you have.
Can't do reason or science, so you resort to fallacies.
Let me know if you grow up and want to talk science and reason like a man.
I'm always game for intelligent discussion. Make your point, support it with facts, reason, or references, and the rest of us can examine it.These are all false claims. This is something that I do understand fairly well and if you like to discuss this we can.
You have a point in this? Or just heckling, as usual?
Straw men, out of context 'gotcha!' phrases, well poisoning, and the gratuitous ad hom.
If you grow up a bit, we can debate the science like men, but if all you're going to do is fling poo with your hominid cronies, nothing useful will come of this..
Or is that the plan? Disrupt so no information, knowledge, or understanding can take place?
You call for it but cannot follow the rules for it. If you want respect you need to earn it. Right now you have earned the responses given. To complain is hypocritical. This is by the way an attempt by you to deflect from the actual topic of this thread.I'm always game for intelligent discussion. Make your point, support it with facts, reason, or references, and the rest of us can examine it.
..but constantly calling me a liar is not a good basis for respectful debate..
Thread**** & deflect with personal attacks all you want. It does not support your belief in common ancestry.No, once again you are describing your activities. You can only post false claims of "ad hom" etc.. Meanwhile I have offered to have a serious discussion with you and you only ran away.
See if you can post without making false claims about the logical fallacies that you do not understand.
Would you like to go over your errors regarding how we know how old the Earth is? Right now you only look like the science denier that others have observed you to be.
Thread**** & deflect with personal attacks all you want. It does not support your belief in common ancestry.
Show me. You say you can discuss and debate science and reason. Prove it. All i see is Bluff, Belittling, Bleating, and Belief..
This is an obvious straw man. This thread is not about what you did a few years ago.Tangential to this subject - I came across this paper a few years ago and found it intriguing:
If you are going to heckle me by providing data, I do not see how we can have a scientific discussion. This is all hearsay, speculation, and assumption. It assumes that there is life. What about the eve virus. It mentions nothing about the eve virus. That is a gene flag marker that I have studied for nearly 40 years of studying genetic architecture of the forced domain magic tree of living genetic architecture.Three RNA cells for ribosomal lineages and three DNA viruses to replicate their genomes: A hypothesis for the origin of cellular domain
Three RNA cells for ribosomal lineages and three DNA viruses to replicate their genomes: A hypothesis for the origin of cellular domain
You call this evidence. Please. I can site well refuted studies that claim magnets are Pols with a half life and the entire universe is a dark matter that refutes Einsteins theory of plate tectonics.It is so weird - apparently, only OTHER people have to present evidence for their views.
I have offered to have a proper discussion with you countless times
You can turn this post, that was not presented as a discussion point, nor directed at me, and use it to mock me, but you still expose youself as an unscientific minded bobblehead. Fling poo all you want. Heckle from the sidelines. But avoid reasoned debate. You can't do that, can you?If you are going to heckle me by providing data, I do not see how we can have a scientific discussion. This is all hearsay, speculation, and assumption.
Once more you go back to your tactic of making false claims that you cannot support about those that know better than you do.The pseudoscience pretenders like to present themselves as experts in every scientific discipline, but can't seem to follow the basic concepts. So they muddy the issues with deflections.. the 4 B's, I've called it:
Bluff
Belittle
Bleat
Belief
But wait! There's more!
Bullying
Bloviating
Boring
They can't present a rational, fact based defense of this theory, so launch into religious and hysterical deflections, to hide their ignorance.
The only real casualty in this is Knowledge and understanding. They oppose that at all costs, to keep the propaganda drum pounding. They are frauds and charlatans, attacking anyone who dares question the sacred tenets of their pathetic 19th century religious beliefs..
These are not scientific minded people, but jihadists and cowards, who cannot reason themselves out of a wet paper bag.
Now now, openly lying about others is not Christian.You can turn this post, that was not presented as a discussion point, nor directed at me, and use it to mock me, but you still expose youself as an unscientific minded bobblehead. Fling poo all you want. Heckle from the sidelines. But avoid reasoned debate. You can't do that, can you?
Why do you constantly illustrate your anti-science bias?