• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Blaming the innocent...

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
sorry

science is great....I like it....but
It can flip flop

in today's internet headlines......a star that is older than the universe

that's right

and the article notes science is looking for NEW physics to explain the observation

sometimes.....science
makes it up as they go about it

Saw that in yesterday's headlines, and the articles goes on to explain possibilities. There are several.

Note the aging of the star is made, in this case by its iron content. The assumption is the HD 140283 formed before metals formed. Nothing strange in that, all the first stars formed before metal formed. Lower atomic weight metals is a product of those stars dying. What i find fascinating is that the star still exists.

No flip flop about it.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
:facepalm:

I already stated planets, solar systems and galaxies are rotating, did you not bother to read that or did you deliberately forget just so you can post your insult.

BTW, so are superclusters but the universe itself isn't
so you would concede.....some things rotate

but not the whole thing

maybe you could meditate some more...…..
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
so you would concede.....some things rotate

but not the whole thing

maybe you could meditate some more...…..

Read my posts, i already stated some things rotate and provided a link as to why... Gravity

The universe does not care about meditation
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
I like assumptions..

but that's not evidence

I assume there is a God

but at least I am using cause and effect

Spirit first

substance as creation

What cause and effect demands god as a cause?

None
 

Bob the Unbeliever

Well-Known Member
so.....if it moves really really fast...…...it's not an explosion?

or maybe explosions don't expand?

or maybe you want a word game?

*sigh*.... go read up on the Big Bang theory. Come back when you've actually studied the actual theory, instead of garbage creationist lying sites.
 

Kenny

Face to face with my Father
Premium Member
QUOTE="Bob the Unbeliever, post: 6246326, member: 61845"]Indeed-- apparently you still do-- you think infinite harm is funny.[/QUOTE]
Could you please reference the quote?

Except when he does nothing of the sort-- but screw those guys, right? Your god seems to ignore 90% of the planet like that....

... but YOU got YOURS so 3#(O)%)#$# those other guys. Right?

I don't quite see it that way... perspective?

But Jesus did make a great statement. He said "12 When Jesus overheard this, he spoke up and said, “Healthy people don’t need` to see a doctor, but the sick will go for treatment.” 13 Then he added, “Now you should go and study the meaning of the verse: I want you to show mercy, not just offer me a sacrifice. For I have come to invite the outcasts of society and sinners, not those who think they are already on the right path.”

[

Meaningless drivel.
I find it quite applicable
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
You are welcome to your beliefs.ere

Here is a paper on how substance can possibly create from nothing
Spontaneous creation of the universe from nothing

And here is an article on another way
Ask Ethan: Can We Really Get A Universe From Nothing?
the second article touches but did not grip the notion

at the POINT of the primordial singularity...…..the void

at the formation of the secondary......infinity is immediate
at hand
the expansion begins

and with two points in play...….axial rotation is also in play

and let's not be shallow
once the rotation begins.....there is no restraint to flow of motion north or south
hence the inception of spiral
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
the second article touches but did not grip the notion

at the POINT of the primordial singularity...…..the void

at the formation of the secondary......infinity is immediate
at hand
the expansion begins

and with two points in play...….axial rotation is also in play

and let's not be shallow
once the rotation begins.....there is no restraint to flow of motion north or south
hence the inception of spiral

No universe rotation. NONE. This is physically observed in the CMB.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
No universe rotation. NONE. This is physically observed in the CMB.
all things......ALL things would be moving in a straight line
if it began as you say

and the expansion would be uniform……..perfect
spherical
and empty
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
all things......ALL things would be moving in a straight line
if it began as you say

and the expansion would be uniform……..perfect
spherical
and empty


All observations that have been made using the most powerful telescopes show that the universe looks the same in all directions. The average density of galaxies is the same throughout theuniverse and does not change with distance or direction. This is called the Cosmological Principle.​

The Universe Adventure - The Homogenous and Isotropic Universe


Cosmological principle - Wikipedia
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
All observations that have been made using the most powerful telescopes show that the universe looks the same in all directions. The average density of galaxies is the same throughout theuniverse and does not change with distance or direction. This is called the Cosmological Principle.​

The Universe Adventure - The Homogenous and Isotropic Universe


Cosmological principle - Wikipedia
what.....no orbits?

no spirals?

no axial rotations?

no galaxies colliding?

seems to me......too many curvatures to make declaration as you do
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
what.....no orbits?

no spirals?

no axial rotations?

no galaxies colliding?

seems to me......too many curvatures to make declaration as you do

Sheesh. How many times? Planets, solar systems, galaxies, super clusters rotate because of gravitational effects, the universe doesn't
 

ChristineM

"Be strong", I whispered to my coffee.
Premium Member
and the straight line you want to believe in.....point a to b

where is it?

Your misunderstanding of the universe is not my problem, i have provided info on the CMB, and a link to explain the cosmological principal. No point in going further
 
Top