If we just take what we currently know and simplistically apply it to an infinite time, yes. However, that in itself is making a lot of assumptions. My point was that you can't just rule out chance - even in the simplistic situation, in an infinite time you would get any configuration you can dream up.
The other point was just as important - entropy is about volumes in phase space and phase space depends on the characteristics of the system. If they change, so does entropy.
There are two options here.
- You apply the same logic as you do to the universe and a god would have to be at least as complex as its creation in order to hold the idea of said creation in its mind - and would therefore have lower entropy / be less probable than the universe.
In this case, you have a bigger problem with entropy than you started with and any entropy arguments for god are clearly invalid.
- You somehow exempt the concept of god from such considerations.
In this case, you have a "god" that doesn't follow the known law of entropy but by some means can explain how the universe is how it is now. In fact, the arguments from entropy do not lead to a god at all - just anything we don't understand that can explain the way the universe is now.
In fact, we don't know why the universe has low entropy, or more specifically, why the state immediately after the BB had a specific type of low entropy (gravitationally very uniform) and that leads us to conclude, if we are being rational about it, not that there is a god, but that there is something we don't know about yet. That should not be news to anybody.