No, I'd say "wuss".Kind of a woose wouldn't you say?
.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No, I'd say "wuss".Kind of a woose wouldn't you say?
.
The Bible clearly states homosexuals are to be put to death, "their blood is on their hands."
But, my point anyways, this is strong evidence we don't need god or religion. Theists, especially and mostly Christians, have no grounds to claim and insist otherwise.
I'm saying lots of us don't. Its a baseless assumption that stands on no ground and is just down right rude to insist we do when it comes to morality and fulfillment. Some sure, do need it. But they are wrong to say we all do.You might not, but others do.
I'm saying lots of us don't. Its a baseless assumption that stands on no ground and is just down right rude to insist we do when it comes to morality and fulfillment. Some sure, do need it. But they are wrong to say we all do.
Not directly, but he said nothing of the Law or Prophets has changed, and warned against claiming otherwise.Well that why I stick to what Jesus says, which is why I am a Christian.
That just seems silly. Why is the Devil involved in something that must be done? Why not show Judas great mercy and leave the Devil out because someone has got to do it.r being ended, the devil having now put into the heart of Judas Iscariot, Simon's son, to betray him;
I'm not jumping to conclusions. You didn't state that, but many do, and you did take it upon yourself to try to debate my claim after I made it. Ultimately, this is further evidence in saying we need god is a false statement. Not yoyr words that we do, but the words of countless others.I never said anybody needed it when it comes to mortality. You are jumping to conclusions.
I said some people do need it. As in we are religious by nature and need it. Not for morality etc.
Not directly, but he said nothing of the Law or Prophets has changed, and warned against claiming otherwise.
Why is the Devil involved in something that must be done?
You didn't state that, but many do,
and you did take it upon yourself to try to debate my claim after I made it.
Ultimately, this is further evidence in saying we need god is a false statement. Not yoyr words that we do, but the words of countless others.
Serves these religions right! And serves LGBTQ people well." And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
I know, I know, you already assumed as much. But in theory, there’s no reason there should be any difference. The disconnect, I would assume, is almost entirely due to the way religious groups perceive and treat LGBTQ people. Many of the largest denominations have actively demonized them to the point where LGBTQ people want nothing to do with organized religion. They may still believe in the supernatural, but they know damn well that holy books have no love for them — and that many followers of God actively work to suppress their civil rights.… gay, lesbian and bisexual adults substantially less likely* than straight adults to affiliate with a religious group. Four-in-ten (41%) identify as atheist, agnostic or “nothing in particular,” compared with just 22% of straight adults who say the same.
*link to Pew article
source
.
.
"Woose" looks like it should rhyme with "moose".
"Woose" looks like it should rhyme with "moose".
But "wuss" is short for "wussy", which rhymes with....you know.
Serves these religions right! And serves LGBTQ people well." And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
I know, I know, you already assumed as much. But in theory, there’s no reason there should be any difference. The disconnect, I would assume, is almost entirely due to the way religious groups perceive and treat LGBTQ people. Many of the largest denominations have actively demonized them to the point where LGBTQ people want nothing to do with organized religion. They may still believe in the supernatural, but they know damn well that holy books have no love for them — and that many followers of God actively work to suppress their civil rights.… gay, lesbian and bisexual adults substantially less likely* than straight adults to affiliate with a religious group. Four-in-ten (41%) identify as atheist, agnostic or “nothing in particular,” compared with just 22% of straight adults who say the same.
*link to Pew article
source
.
.
Banning homosexuality, persecuting and inciting violence against gays is "showing truth and love"??? Telling people they're sinners, a depraved abomination before the Creator and going to burn in hell because they love someone of the same sex is "truth and love"?showing truth and showing love to homosexuals.
If by "uniform" you mean publicly promoting their cause for equality, this only happens on occasion. No doubt the reason it stands out is because of the press interest it gathers, and the fact that it is somewhat new and may be something you oppose or find rankling.Members of the LGBTQ often wear their sexuality as a uniform. This makes them stand out, creating its own reality in terms of environmental feedback.
If I went to a Liberal rally, wearing a MAGA hat, this would lead to a mob style backlash. It is not necessarily about me, the person, but about my choice to wear a symbol, that can push angry buttons. If I entered the same room, without that symbol, I would be more accepted, and not made to feel uncomfortable, unless I say things that push other buttons.
For some reason, members of LGBTQ community want to wear their uniform; symbol, as though they are part of another religion, and their initiation into that sect, requires they evangelize. This will lead to backlash and a self for filling prophesy of negative feedback.
If you assume LGBTQ is natural, and it represents a certain percept of the human population, very few people knew what T or Q was 20 years ago. This is not because it did not exist, but because it was below the radar. There was no social backlash, until the uniform was put on, as a display to get attention.
If you go back 50 years ago, and assume the percent of the population that is gay and lesbian is also the same percent as today, although this behavior was known, it was not considered very common, since the uniform was not yet a prerequisite, and most was below the radar. Most gay and lesbians could blend in without any backlash.
And don't you find that shameful; people being judged negatively for whom they feel they are?If Joe was transitioning into Joan, but when he goes to Church, he dresses as Joe, he would be greeted by friends as always. If one day he wears the uniform of Joan, the level of negativity will increase due to misunderstanding.
Blame? Blame for what, their inner feelings? If anything, it would be god for having made them the way they are. They certainly didn't choose to be LGBT or Q.Regardless of who is to blame, the spirit of Satan appears in the Church due to the hostility induced.
"Love"? Now that's a laugh.You're right! It's our fault for showing truth and showing love to homosexuals.
Banning homosexuality, persecuting and inciting violence against gays is "showing truth and love"??? Telling people they're sinners, a depraved abomination before the Creator and going to burn in hell because they love someone of the same sex is "truth and love"?
Shocking. Spend enough time demonising a group, and they're less likely to want to play with you. Where can I get research grants for these "is water wet?" type projects?Serves these religions right! And serves LGBTQ people well." And fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in hell.
I know, I know, you already assumed as much. But in theory, there’s no reason there should be any difference. The disconnect, I would assume, is almost entirely due to the way religious groups perceive and treat LGBTQ people. Many of the largest denominations have actively demonized them to the point where LGBTQ people want nothing to do with organized religion. They may still believe in the supernatural, but they know damn well that holy books have no love for them — and that many followers of God actively work to suppress their civil rights.… gay, lesbian and bisexual adults substantially less likely* than straight adults to affiliate with a religious group. Four-in-ten (41%) identify as atheist, agnostic or “nothing in particular,” compared with just 22% of straight adults who say the same.
*link to Pew article
source
.
.