Then based on all you've written to date, you should establish it, abiogenesis, to assist me from my delusions. Go ahead, I'm listening, sincerely!
No one here is telling you to believe in God, in Jesus, in the Bible, in the church you belonged to.
What you choose to believe, is yours, and no one can take away your choice of what you want to believe in.
But if you are choosing to argue with other members about science or how you are trying to mix your religious belief with science, then you should be prepared to put your belief in god, Jesus and religion in the spotlight, be prepared to accept not only criticism, but that you are wrong about your religion, and wrong your misinformation in science.
You clearly don’t understand evolution and abiogenesis half as well as you believe you do, and yet you feel the needs to challenge everyone with something you don’t understand.
Delusional? No.
Foolhardy? Yes.
You are being terribly reckless, as your next paragraph shows:
By the way, I take the Bible as inerrant based on a variety of proofs ranging from the teleological and ontological to life changes, the excellencies of Christ, and yes, biology.
You are claiming the Bible to be inerrant, and yet there are many errors and inconsistencies found in many places, both in the OT & NT, discrepancies that even amateur scholar like me can find if I closely examine the texts.
You can like, others before you, claimed that the issues (eg errors) were a matter of translation errors, but that would only work, if you have the original sources, to compare it against, but no such originals exist.
All we have to go on, are extant copies being used as the sources, eg the Septuagint, Masoretic Text, the Dead Sea Scrolls.
Note that we don’t even have the complete and original LXX Septuagint. We have extant copies of the Septuagint, like the Codex Vaticanus, Codex Sinaiticus: these are dated between 4th and 5th centuries CE. These are where modern translations, if the Septuagint is used as a source, but they are not original Septuagint.
So what we have is not the original Septuagint, so technically you only have Septuagint manuscripts that DON’T predate the Dead Sea Scrolls.
The Masoretic Text, likewise don’t predate the Dead Sea Scrolls, because they were originally composed after the fall of Jerusalem, but the original Masoretic Text don’t exist anymore. What we have are 2 main copies from 10th century CE: Aleppo Codex and the Leningrad Codex. These are what modern translators may use.