Like i am just asking that, the point is the islamic hadiths forbids it but it also gives "vague reasons why it is" its very straight to the point that image making is just bad. But they take images as idols or something and i assume thats why it is forbidden... in a very vague way.
Point is i feel the bible is much more, transparent to what comes after it.
Like i am not saying, you cant see if it cant be interpreted otherwise. But i dunno. It just feels hard for some reason. I just have not seen any way if its possible. Since it does just seem point blank that, you are sorta trying to play a creator even though you are not one seems to be what i feel it is accusing you of is why painting or making animate stuff is a sin in islam.
I think you're right that the thinking behind both religions' injunctions is idolatry, but there are different interpretations and practices in both. Religion seems to change to reflect the current culture, with occasional retreats into fundamentalism among those feeling insecure or threatened.
Point is that some religious culture is a tad bit more, easier.. I dunno.
Like Islamic hadiths also says dont make faith hard on followers, but again it is also very consistant on importance of keeping up rules to being clear and sound.
i just feels its more religious cultural consistency for some reason depending on the religious culture and how its applied and how it differs. Like i dont try to act like an expert. But I'd love to hear your feedback
Are there any 'experts'? Perhaps there are too many experts. Both society and religion evolve, and historical practices and interpretations have been all over the map.
My first thought I get now is that we should also not make a picture of God
And is picture meant literally or figuratively. Describing in words is to me also a picture, let alone to blind people.
Then it would mean that we should not say "God hates when you do this etc." or "God wants you to do this or that"
Do I understand correctly what you were implying?
The holy writings say all sorts of ambiguous, even contradictory things.
I'm saying that interpretations in both religions could easily be interpreted either to permit or forbid images -- or specific images.
Both books are inconsistent, even contradictory.