"The Top 10 Claims Made by Creationists to Counter Scientific Theories"

[ImmortalFlame]

You have the human man of flesh and blood.
And you have the Spirit man, which is not of flesh and blood.

The Spirit man was there with the dinosaurs.

I would love to see the evidence of this.

 

[Altfish]

You have the human man of flesh and blood.
And you have the Spirit man, which is not of flesh and blood.

The Spirit man was there with the dinosaurs.

OK, you win.
Unfortunately I do not recognise the 'Spirit man'

 

[Faithofchristian]

But, of course, left no evidence. So there is no good reason to think it existed at all.

Maybe not to you.

 

[Faithofchristian]

OK, you win.
Unfortunately I do not recognise the 'Spirit man'

That's quite ok, alot of Christians do not recognize the "Spirit man" all bc they are not taught the explicitly of what the Bible supports.

 

[Altfish]

That's quite ok, alot of Christians do not recognize the "Spirit man" all bc they are not taught the explicitly of what the Bible supports.

I'm not a Christian, I'm an atheist. I'd say all atheists do not recognise 'Spirit man'

 

[Faithofchristian]

I would love to see the evidence of this.

Well guess you haven't been looking any evidence, it's all there, just look it up.

Take the foot prints of the dinosaurs and what looks like human foot prints.

Alot of people, takes those foot prints as being human foot prints.
But what I see is not human beings of flesh and blood beings foot prints.
But the Spirit Man foot Prints.
Of course you wouldn't understand none of this.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

Well guess you haven't been looking any evidence, it's all there, just look it up.

Take the foot prints of the dinosaurs and what looks like human foot prints.

Link, please.

Alot of people, takes those foot prints as being human foot prints.
But what I see is not human beings of flesh and blood beings foot prints.
But the Spirit Man foot Prints.
Of course you wouldn't understand none of this.

I can't if you refuse to actually show it to me.

 

[Faithofchristian]

I'm not a Christian, I'm an atheist. I'd say all atheists do not recognise 'Spirit man'

But you do recognize the dinosaurs bones as being real.
And many foot prints of the dinosaurs and what they call human foot prints As being together.

I really like it, seeing people falling all over the place trying to explain who and what those foot prints are.
Not realizing those foot prints were not made a human of flesh and blood.
But the "Spirit man" which can pass from one dimension to our dimension.

 

[Faithofchristian]

Link, please.


I can't if you refuse to actually show it to me.

Go look it up, take some time for yourself and look it up.

 

[ImmortalFlame]

Go look it up, take some time for yourself and look it up.

You don't seem to understand how this works. YOU made the claim, so YOU have to support it. If I just Google "human footprints with dinosaur footprints" I may get a result, but it may turn out that the instance you are referring to is different to the one I find, and so I may end up coming away none the wiser.

So, when YOU say there is evidence of some sort, it is incumbent upon YOU to PROVIDE said evidence. If you cannot, then WE are justified in ignoring your claims.

 

[exchemist]

I'm not a Christian, I'm an atheist. I'd say all atheists do not recognise 'Spirit man'

And not only atheists.................

 

[exchemist]

Let's redefine the definition of man, that there are two species of man that are spoken about.
Now the question is, which man is which.
You without a doubt, have no clue or idea.

Well the science break is clearly over on this thread. And it was going so well........

So you want to talk in riddles, do you? I'll leave that game to others. Maybe I'll look in after a couple more pages, to see what you were on about.

 

[Altfish]

But you do recognize the dinosaurs bones as being real.
And many foot prints of the dinosaurs and what they call human foot prints As being together.

I really like it, seeing people falling all over the place trying to explain who and what those foot prints are.
Not realizing those foot prints were not made a human of flesh and blood.
But the "Spirit man" which can pass from one dimension to our dimension.

Good grief, I thought creationists had given up on this nonsense years ago, try reading something outside the bubble...

Paluxy River tracks - RationalWiki

Paluxy Dinosaur/"Man Track" controversy

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

There were no humans living together with the dinosaurs, But yet man was there along side with the dinosaurs.
Now how is this possible ?

Here is a picture of a man being attacked by a dinosaur (if you are into cladistics):

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

But you do recognize the dinosaurs bones as being real.
And many foot prints of the dinosaurs and what they call human foot prints As being together.

I am aware of some fakes that exist, as well as dinosaur footprints that were mistaken for human footprints. I am not aware of any legitimate human footprints that were found in the same geologic layers as dinosaurs, nor any human bones found in the same layers.

I really like it, seeing people falling all over the place trying to explain who and what those foot prints are.
Not realizing those foot prints were not made a human of flesh and blood.
But the "Spirit man" which can pass from one dimension to our dimension.

I say that they were made by invisible pink unicorns. Do you find that to be a compelling argument?

 

[exchemist]

That one always intrigues me. Creationists themselves started out as a single cell and developed over time into a fully complex human being. They seem ok with a single cell developing into a full human in just 9 months, but they think going from a single cell to a full human over billions of years somehow violates a natural law. The shear amount of cognitive dissonance this must create fascinates me. How do creationists hold on to such vapid and false claims in the face of basic facts that show how wrong they are? The psychology of creationism is perhaps one of the most intriguing parts of the debate.

Yes I presume you refer to the thermodynamic argument against evolution that they sometimes use. This is where it comes off the rails. The (false) contention is that an increase in order goes against nature. And yet this is exactly what we see every time a fertilised egg develops into an embryo and then through to an adult organism!

 

[Stevicus]

Here is video proof of dinosaurs living at the same time as humans.

 

[Thermos aquaticus]

Yes I presume you refer to the thermodynamic argument against evolution that they sometimes use. This is where it comes off the rails. The (false) contention is that an increase in order goes against nature. And yet this is exactly what we see every time a fertilised egg develops into an embryo and then through to an adult organism!

It's what happens every time we measure the relative temperatures of the oceans at the equator and the poles and observe that the distribution of heat in the oceans is ordered. An increase in order is what happens every time you plug a refrigerator in. It gets even stranger when creationists then argue that an intelligence can violate the laws of thermodynamics.

 

[Faithofchristian]

You don't seem to understand how this works. YOU made the claim, so YOU have to support it. If I just Google "human footprints with dinosaur footprints" I may get a result, but it may turn out that the instance you are referring to is different to the one I find, and so I may end up coming away none the wiser.

So, when YOU say there is evidence of some sort, it is incumbent upon YOU to PROVIDE said evidence. If you cannot, then WE are justified in ignoring your claims.

What you think, you need to be spoon fed, it's not that hard in to days world, all you have to do, is click on the internet and search.

 

[exchemist]

It's what happens every time we measure the relative temperatures of the oceans at the equator and the poles and observe that the distribution of heat in the oceans is ordered. An increase in order is what happens every time you plug a refrigerator in. It gets even stranger when creationists then argue that an intelligence can violate the laws of thermodynamics.

I have to say I have not come across the Thermodynamic Argument recently from creationists, though it was all the rage a decade or so ago. It may be that those few creationists with enough science education to put forward a thermodynamic argument have realised it doesn't stack up! Let's hope so.