james blunt
Well-Known Member
Me too! I'm a genius on the internet too!
I know me, prove I am not a genius, try to discredit my diagram ?
Einstein was incorrect.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Me too! I'm a genius on the internet too!
How do I know? If I investigate another persons science thread and theory, there is people who reply and pick parts of their theory out and take it to pieces , showing them where they are incorrect.
However in my threads, silence becomes validation of the truth. Nobody manages to take my theories apart, they can only attack the messenger.
I am just so good at this malarkey.
Clearly you need to do a bit more work. You have thrown a few symbols around and have given some pictures. But nothing even approaching understanding, let alone genius.
Great. So go get some investors, build it, and prove us scoffers wrong. Your powers of reason and physical knowledge are astounding, we cannot allow you to waste them here, when there are so many crimes going unpunished at this very moment! Go, go! For the good of the city!It would cost a fortune, I could prove the physics works cost effective.
It would be a sound investment and good equity for an investor.
Once the physics are proved the companies value would rapidly incline on the stock market.
It is not like I could not put a pitch together to look for investment. I am not sure I was ready until now.
I have several ideas that I could patent I think.
I know my stuff.
P.s Any wise investor knows the smart investment is in the person , not necessarily a one off niche.
I know me, prove I am not a genius, try to discredit my diagram ?
Einstein was incorrect.
A wise person does not give the absolute understandings, throwing crumbs to seagulls does not give them the full loaf.
Nothing there is worth more than a cursory glance. Delusions seldom are.
It would cost a fortune, I could prove the physics works cost effective.
It would be a sound investment and good equity for an investor.
Once the physics are proved the companies value would rapidly incline on the stock market.
It is not like I could not put a pitch together to look for investment. I am not sure I was ready until now.
I have several ideas that I could patent I think.
I know my stuff.
P.s Any wise investor knows the smart investment is in the person , not necessarily a one off niche.
Let us know when you manage to build anything, let alone one of your devices.
For that matter, let us know when you actually understand anything about science. As shown by actual results.
With due respect, that is a feeble attempt of proving me incorrect. Focusing on me is not any sort of conviction in honesty of the idea.
Great. So go get some investors, build it, and prove us scoffers wrong. Your powers of reason and physical knowledge are astounding, we cannot allow you to waste them here, when there are so many crimes going unpunished at this very moment! Go, go! For the good of the city!
I didn't find an idea there. I found a pseudo-idea with no connection to reality. But hey, if that's what trips your trigger, go for it.
Then I suggest you need to understand and go learn some of Einsteins relativity , I suggest you view some thought experiments of his . Einstein states that mass cannot move at the speed of light. He is wrong as my diagram shows.
First major mistake. Mass is NOT just information.You can consider my quantum leaper is information, I am transferring this information point to point transport by using a beam , that travels at c. We already know we can transfer information at c, therefore mass can travel at c with the light, because the mass is just information.
This information can have an equal and opposite force to the beam, the beam will push the craft at c because there is no opposing force from space on the craft. The craft will flow with the beam like a stick flows with a river. The donkey with a carrot on a stick walking along, extends the stick .
I am a genius and science is wrong on lots of things.
Firstly, my diagram shows everything I wanted to show, your failure to understand the diagram is not my fault. I have clearly labelled the diagram and even put the vectors in .Oh, I understand what Einstein said quite well. And he was correct, as shown by every particle accelerator and every experiment we have ever done.
Your diagram is just that: a diagram. It shows nothing.
The way it differs from what Einstein did is that Einstein actually understood physics and Maxwell's equations and used thought experiments after he had that understanding.
First major mistake. Mass is NOT just information.
If only you could actually build this 'quantum leaper'. It would be a quantum leap in our understanding and abilities. Drawing a picture is not the same as having an idea.
Firstly, my diagram shows everything I wanted to show, your failure to understand the diagram is not my fault. I have clearly labelled the diagram and even put the vectors in .
You say mass is not information, information is the properties of an object, you would be again incorrect because information is the physics of things.
I don't care about old information, such as a particle accelerator, I use my own science that I devised from the old outdated science .
Me too! I'm a genius on the internet too!
Nobody discusses my ideas, they would rather say I am delusional in response. Science is always telling me I am wrong, you could not imagine how confusing this can be, my mind knows I am right, science tells me I am wrong, I have my own paradox to deal with.
Oh boy .....Part of the responsibility of a scholar is to communicate effectively. Your picture shows nothing. it isn't based on anything in reality.
If you disagree, build it and prove everyone wrong. Find someone who will fund it. Convince *anyone* that you are talking something other than nonsense.
Good luck!
I'm not. I understand nothing at all about science.
Oh boy .....
My Leaper is the nose cone off a standard rocket.
View attachment 21349
In the link /video , contract the Y-axis between the two spaceships, no time dilation, no contraction if there is no length. It is a parlour trick .