If God is omnipresent, omnipotent, omniscient and the universe is 14 billion years old. Why are we still trying to prove logically that God exists. P1, P2, P3 etc when evidence of God's should be so overwhelming that it would be impossible to ignore or refute? Yet all we get from Theists is the same logical arguments
P1. God does not exist, objective moral values do not exist.
P2. Objective moral values do exist.
P3. Therefore, God exists.
It appears from the logical argument the evidence for objective morality is higher than the evidence for God and, we can at best only deduce from objective morality the probability of God's existence. That is how the Christians have reduced God to an absurd logical argument by appealing to the atheists to accept morality as being objective.
P1. God does not exist, objective moral values do not exist.
P2. Objective moral values do exist.
P3. Therefore, God exists.
It appears from the logical argument the evidence for objective morality is higher than the evidence for God and, we can at best only deduce from objective morality the probability of God's existence. That is how the Christians have reduced God to an absurd logical argument by appealing to the atheists to accept morality as being objective.