It is a valid comparison - only, for some reason, you are only anti-Muslim and quite tolerant of those two faiths.
First off, I am anti-Islam, not anti-Muslim. Please learn the difference and stop both muddying the waters & misrepresenting my position. Second, you clearly have not read back through my post history. I do post against Christian intolerance. The reason I don't have much to say against Judaism is because the Jewish members here are mild-mannered, reasoned, and don't often subscribe to a worldview that non-Jews should be made to conform to their beliefs.
No more so than Christianity or Judaism
It's possible to constrain the other two with secular forms of governance; as shown in both post-Enlightenment Europe and the modern state of Israel. Islam does not tolerate secular forms of governance as it is a complete, all-encompassing way of life.
Again, Christians and Jews who are violent (less of them - probably because the West isn't bombing and invading their countries) do not have to twist the words of their holy books much either. Why are you picking on Muslims?
I call out Christian violence and, to a lesser extent, Jewish violence such as religiously-minded Israeli settlers on the rare occasion it crops up. I'm not picking on Muslims; there are concerns I have with Islam that I don't have with Christianity & Judaism. When was the last time, for instance, you heard of someone being murdered as an 'apostate' for leaving Christianity? When was the last time
Are you real?
There are peace marches and a whole lot more going on. Open your eyes.
And because these people are a tiny minority of Muslims then I can, using your logic, dismiss what you're saying because they're not the majority.
And universities have had white nationalist speakers - should we close them down too?
Universities are public institutes which have until recent decades been subject to far greater scrutiny than your average mosque. This is still true to a certain extent because of the tendency of some to start throwing out accusations of Islamophobia & racism which dampens conversation and raises fears of being conflated with actual racists who just hate everything that's foreign. Further, universities do actually tend to de-platform white nationalist speakers. Unfortunately, because people tend to engage in the disingenuous conflation you have, by accusing people who are anti-Islam of being anti-Muslim, they also tend to de-platform ex-Muslims who have legitimate concerns about the faith they grew up in like Maryam Namazie.
Last year
the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain was accosted by the police for marching at a London Pride event with an 'Allah is gay' sign while protesters marching with a 'Jesus is gay' sign were not bothered. The East London mosque filed a complaint (though, strangely, only about the 'Allah is gay' sign and not the Jesus one even though Jesus is supposedly a holy figure in Islam) and there has been talk of banning CEMB from future marches.
I'd find that easier to believe if you targetted Jews and Christians for the violence endoresed by their Holy books and didn't just pick on Muslims. Your singling out of just one faith makes me wary as to your motives.
I'd find it easier to sympathise with your suspicions if you had read back through my post history to see that your misgivings are unfounded. For instance I've stated publicly that I think the Catholic Church is a criminal organisation that should be disbanded, its assets seized and its high-ranking members subject to arrest in relation to the global child abuse scandal, as well as other criminal activities like money laundering.
I'm saying no such thing - That's my point which you have obviously missed.
Well that's what it reads like when you try to say I'm being anti-Muslim rather than anti-Islam. Muslims are not all religious in the same way and have varying degrees of faith. This is why I don't have a problem with Muslims as a group.
You can't blame a faith for a system of government can you?
I absolutely can if that system of government is theocratic, or relies on religious institutes to suppress the masses/protect the existing power structure.
If so, atheist, Christian, pagan, Hindu, Shinto and Jewish governments have all been despotic.
Atheism isn't a faith and I doubt you can find a core doctrine of atheism that motivated, say, Stalin to send people to Siberian gulags. I can't imagine him shouting 'In the name of non-existent gods!' when he did that.
As to the rest, you are correct in most cases (I'm not implictly disagreeing re: Hinduism for the simple reason I'm not that clued up on Indian history). So make those criticisms. But not as a deflection from ones we're making now because that's an invalid attempt at argument. So many people who defend Islam from any & all criticism would be fine with us criticising the above belief systems but think Islam uniquely should be protected from any such treatment; even while simultaneously arguing that we ought to treat Islam & Muslims the same we do as other faiths.
Edward II cast out all Jews from his realm - even drowning several hundred. Why no mention? Or do we look to our King for British Values?
The fact you're having to go back 600-700 years to find a deflection away from Islam towards Christianity is interesting. You don't need to go back that far to be honest. Also, I don't look to any unelected sponger as an exemplar for any sort of values aside from a lesson in what will happen if we grant undeserved wealth, power & privilege into anybody's hands.