dislike atheism

[Polymath257]

stars die.

So? Why do you think there is anything that lasts forever?

 

[Unveiled Artist]

Aka ---> @Subduction Zone
What he/she said.

i mean, atheists think that themselves are real but what created them is imaginary.

How can something that does not exist be imaginary?

There has to be an idea or concept of a god to deny; I have none.

There has to specifics to know which god you talk of; we need something to base our imagination on

You would need to demonstrate there is a god....then we can deny what exists not what does not.

Can you answer the questions?

 

[syo]

By definition, one's lifespan is "all there is" to each of us.

We can and do have lifeprints that transcend our individual existences, of course. But it is not like existence owes us that and we have a duty to believe in a creator god in return, if that is what you are suggesting.

Acceptance of reality is a good thing.

i believe we must accept reality that's why we must accept god. denying god is not accepting reality.

 

[Revoltingest]

atheists deny a creator god but they don't deny their own being. why and how do we exist then, if not for a creating power? so atheists believe that only themselves exist, and the creation power is imaginary. atheism is totally wrong. they deny the creator god, and they think that only their own temporary being exists. how atheism has followers is strange.

I think you're over-complicating my brand of atheism.....
See no evidence of gods.
So don't believe in gods.

It's not for everyone.

 

[syo]

So? Why do you think there is anything that lasts forever?

god lasts forever and he creates. that's all there is.

 

[Jesster]

i believe we must accept reality that's why we must accept god. denying god is not accepting reality.

Why do you think a god is part of reality? You keep claiming it, but I'm not seeing any reason behind your claims. Please explain further.

 

[Polymath257]

i believe we must accept reality that's why we must accept god. denying god is not accepting reality.

Really? Can you prove that?

I don't believe the universe as a whole has a cause. The reason? Causality is part of the universe.

While I believe in a great many things that are 'greater than us', like stars and galaxies, I do not believe anything 'lasts forever', although a hydrogen atom comes closer than most things.

 

[Subduction Zone]

god

And you have evidence for this "god"?

 

[Polymath257]

god lasts forever and he creates. that's all there is.

You make a claim, but provide no reason to think there is such a being.

 

[suncowiam]

OP is making so many assumptions and now we have to defend ourselves from this?

The very first thing you need is to prove all that you believe here, then I'll branch into your thoughts of atheism.

If you can't prove it, then what's the point?

 

[Subduction Zone]

god lasts forever and he creates. that's all there is.

A claim that is not supported by evidence is not worth anything.

If I claimed that the universe was made by flatulent pixies without any support would you believe me?

 

[syo]

You would need to demonstrate there is a god....then we can deny what exists not what does not.

i will give you the definition of god. god is an eternal, unchange, logical being that cause nature to exist. nature is ephemeral, it changes, and it's laws are god-sent.

 

[Jesster]

i will give you the definition of god. god is an eternal, unchange, logical being that cause nature to exist. nature is ephemeral, it changes, and it's laws are god sent.

Cool. Now demonstrate that it exists. We have plenty of definitions, but that doesn't get us anywhere.

 

[syo]

How do you know that?

logic

 

[Altfish]

atheists deny a creator god but they don't deny their own being. why and how do we exist then, if not for a creating power? so atheists believe that only themselves exist, and the creation power is imaginary. atheism is totally wrong. they deny the creator god, and they think that only their own temporary being exists. how atheism has followers is strange.

May I change your post...

Atheists deny a flying teapot but they don't deny their own being. why and how do we exist then, if not for a flying teapot? So atheists believe that only themselves exist, and the flying teapot is imaginary. atheism is totally wrong. they deny the flying teapot, and they think that only their own temporary being exists. how atheism has followers is strange.

It makes just as much sense in that format

 

[Jesster]

logic

Go on...

 

[syo]

And nobody says we did. But that doesn't mean an intelligence created us. We are caused, but not created.

so you are the only intelligence in the universe? are you kidding?

 

[syo]

Cool. Now demonstrate that it exists. We have plenty of definitions, but that doesn't get us anywhere.

logic

 

[Subduction Zone]

i will give you the definition of god. god is an eternal, unchange, logical being that cause nature to exist. nature is ephemeral, it changes, and it's laws are god-sent.

Not much of a definition. One that appears to be copied from the failed arguments of WLC. What do you mean by "logical"? What makes you think that a god "sent" the laws of nature?

 

[syo]

May I change your post...

Atheists deny a flying teapot but they don't deny their own being. why and how do we exist then, if not for a flying teapot? So atheists believe that only themselves exist, and the flying teapot is imaginary. atheism is totally wrong. they deny the flying teapot, and they think that only their own temporary being exists. how atheism has followers is strange.

It makes just as much sense in that format

you are joking right?