The prophecies can be interpreted in different ways, albeit often inconsistently and incompletely. Look for instance into the interpretations of the revelation (where two witnesses are mentioned) by some of the Christian scholars from different denominations and see if they have a complete interpretation verse by verse. Are their interpretations compatible verse by verse with the events of verifiable history? Are they also interpreting the prophecies in Islam as well? why not? I suppose because they imagine only their own religion is true. Do Muslim Scholars interpret the Book of revelation verse by verse, or they ignore it because most of them believe it to be corrupted? But the Baha'i Central Figures have interpreted the prophecies of Shia and Sunni, Christianity and Jewish Bible extensively and fairly completely and consistently showing they match with history, in such a way that no one can refute them. Not withstanding that no traces of religious study can be found in history to attribute to the central figures of the Baha'i faith and more impressively, when Abdulbaha was giving interpretations of the chapters of Revelation, He did not stop to think how to match each verse with history. But it just flowed from His mind. Now think about the beast of Book of revelation with seven heads and ten horns, which Abdulbaha interprets as seven dominions where Islam progressed and 10 names of Ummayids. He even from His mind gave accurately the names of the seven dominions where Islam progressed in them, and the 10 names of Ummayids as well as. Now when we verify His interpretations and compare with history, we see exactly there has been seven dominions or main regions where Islam progressed during Ummayids reign as no where more or less did Islam progressed, and there are only 10 names that Ummayids had. This is of course an example intended to demonstrate He interprets all from His mind in twinkling of an eye, while accurately in a way that cannot be refuted. when I say it cannot be refuted, I do not mean everyone can believe it, but I mean one cannot prove any mismatches between history and the explanation of the prophecy described by Abdulbaha, thus, cannot prove, this prophecy was not fulfilled. Now, the important thing is to know that, it is not like He had to think how to interpret them, or having history books around him to see what matches with the prophecy. He did not study history or religion on His own before either, so it may be said He possibly used that knowledge to think how to match the prophecy with history. As there have been many people around Him all the time, and though many of His companions wrote about the days of life of Abdulbaha, they never said, Abdulbaha was reading history or religious books, and it is unlikely and virtually impossible that they missed it, or forgot to mention it in their historical accounts, even though in their historical accounts, they often mentioned many details of doings and sayings of Abdulbaha. An obviously mysterious ability that, we cannot find any one else in the history among Christians, Hindus,Muslims or anybody else to do such things. Now we have to see the differences here. How others interpret, and how Abdulbaha did. Have you seen anyone else with no prior study of history and religion, and without any traces of reading books or learning from others, interprets Prophecies and matches them with historical accounts?
