Prestor John
Well-Known Member
What do you believe it is?The JST.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What do you believe it is?The JST.
The evidence is plain as day but you refuse to see it because of your own faith based blinders. Just reread his post. The evidence is there.Ok. Can you share the part of his post where he offered any evidence to support his claims?
No one, Prestor John included, has been able to explain this. I think we all know why.How about 3 Nephi 13:25-27 and Mathew 6:25-27? Why does the Book of Mormon passage match the KJV rather than the Joseph Smith inspired version?
I have had spiritual experiences. Your spiritual ineptitude does not disprove those experiences.There is no such thing as a 'spiritual experience'. That just...doesn't mean anything.
The closest translation would be 'emotional experience'. Once someone is emotionally convinced of something, reason goes out the window. Once reason goes out the window there is nothing left to discuss, but discuss it you do!
Round and round, round and round.
I don't think you understand.Just as there is some commonality in the Gospels suggesting a common very early source. It is reasonable to suppose that this would also apply in some measure to the book of Mormon.
The book of Mormon is itself a translation, why would it not be translated using the common religious style of the day.
Ok, but since you refuse to tell me what you believe the Inspired Version is, I'm going in blind.Are you in third grade? What's with the name calling?
I've asked the question. Either you can answer or you can't. Last chance.
Where similar stories appear in the Bible they never match each other in detail.I don't think you understand.
We have the Bible.
Along comes Joseph Smith who gives us the Book of Mormon. The most "correct" book on earth, unadulterated by those pesky Christians after the "Great Apostacy." The Book of Mormon includes the sermon on the mount as given by Christ to the Nephites. It is word for word the same as what was in King James Version of the Bible.
Years later, Joseph works on an "inspired" version/translation of the Bible. This time, his "inspired" version of the Sermon on the Mount is nothing like what is found in the Bible or Book of Mormon.
If the Book of Mormon is the most correct book, why does its Sermon on the Mount not match Joseph's inspired version? Why does it match the KJV that Joseph readily had access to and used?
When I have time, I'll type out the different versions so you can see it isn't a matter of "using common religious style of the day." Rather, it's a complete reimagining and alteration.
That doesn't make any sense.Ok, but since you refuse to tell me what you believe the Inspired Version is, I'm going in blind.
The reason that the Inspired Version of those verses was not used is because that would not have been what Jesus had said to the Nephites.
Jesus gave the same information tot he Nephites that He had given to the Jews.
Again, I need to post the verses so you understand.Where similar stories appear in the Bible they never match each other in detail.
Any one translating a new found work,
would use prior knowledge to help in that process.
As I understand it, his own inspired version is not used, and the KJV is in official use today.
No he wasn't. He was providing inspired commentary.He was correcting the Bible.
No one said that the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew was "incorrect."Why would the Book of Mormon, the most "correct" book, match the incorrect Bible rather than Joseph's inspired version made years later?
Wrong.No he wasn't. He was providing inspired commentary.
No one said that the Sermon on the Mount in Matthew was "incorrect."
The sermon that the Lord gave in Matthew is the same sermon He gave to the Nephites. That is why it is the same.
No wonder you ran away from my question!
Ok.Wrong.
The inspired version is Joseph's attempt to correct the Bible. It's not some kind of Cliff Notes.
How could I possibly quote Joseph saying that? They didn't have Cliff Notes back then.Ok.
Can you quote Joseph Smith saying that?
From Joseph Smith - Mathew.Ok.
Can you quote Joseph Smith saying that?
And from D&C 45, the Lord commanded Joseph to "translate," not provide a study guide or help.How could I possibly quote Joseph saying that? They didn't have Cliff Notes back then.
And from the LDS Bible Dictionary (confirming that it was a translation intended to restore what had been lost from the Bible):Ok.
Can you quote Joseph Smith saying that?
He wouldn't have used that language, your just trying to protect him.Then that is where you err.
If you considered the idea that the Book of Mormon was a translated work, then you would have no issue with it sharing the same language as the King James.