Personally, I don't believe in borders at all, so this is for the sake of argument. But if there are ISIS members and and Al Qaeda members in France, and they are willingly open to kill people who practice apostasy in a country where Sharia law is not the situation, nor do Muslims constitute more than 10% of the population, and the average Muslim such as yourself openly agrees with the open murder of not just random people at the offensive newspaper, but even another Muslim cop, then wouldn't the simplest and most efficient way to fix this problem is to exile Muslims?
Do the majority of Muslims ask questions when determining which apostates to kill or exile? They certainly don't. How else could you avoid the corruption, right?
Like I said, I don't have any problems with any of the Muslims I've known. Then again, none of them of openly stated I should be put to death because I'm an atheist, or that it's okay for with a gun to go around shooting people. But if I was take the logic that it's definitely okay to kill people because of the things they say, then why would I limit this to apostates?
I don't know. Are Christians going around Egypt, Syria, Iraq, Morocco, and Indonesia and killing Muslims for insulting their religion? Wouldn't it be acceptable for them to do so, according to your theology?