oldbadger
Skanky Old Mongrel!
Could it be that they wanted to make your country a better land for all?Wonder why the dems adopted it? ..........
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Could it be that they wanted to make your country a better land for all?Wonder why the dems adopted it? ..........
No..... you cannot stop us anywhere.....
A 'Right' is a condition that everybody who is able to 'should pay for'. It's one of the features of a civilised country that supports HUMAN RIGHTS.
Some of you are are just so 'DARK AGES'.
Wrong! You're thinking of anarchy, there.
That is such a mind-bogglingly crazy sentence!
If you want to live in a community then you need to support it .......... that means paying into it when you are able to.
..... at WHAT!!!?????
..... Have a look at countries which do have NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, and see how amazing they are.
The reason that my wife is still alive is because our NHS leads the way, worldwide, on PhaeoChromoCytoma, and carries out all the lifesaving ops for FREE! In the US, more folks die from this condition, simply because they could never afford the op or the long term Critical Care Ward afterwards. You're in the dark-ages...... and your President is a shining example of brilliant World Class leadership. True.
Here in the States, we have this document called the "Constitution", and in the "Preamble", it states that one of the responsibilities of the federal government is to "provide for the general welfare", and I would suggest that life and death issues like healthcare qualifies.I'm curious where you dreamed up this concept that healthcare is a right, and furthermore, that taxpayers are required to foot the bill.
Now you've slipped into bigotry. Is this a mark of your "faith"?And I take offense for you suggesting that the foreigner, obama, is my President.
Here in the States, we have this document called the "Constitution", and in the "Preamble", it states that one of the responsibilities of the federal government is to "provide for the general welfare", and I would suggest that life and death issues like healthcare qualifies.
I would also suggest that a Christian, Jew, Muslim, etc. that has true compassion for all, including the poor, will advocate programs that help them. If voluntary contributions could solve the problem of those who do not have access to adequate healthcare, I'd opt for just using that, but it has never been able to do as such.
Now you've slipped into bigotry. Is this a mark of your "faith"?
Kal-el
You poor thing, robbed at gunpoint by those evil communists forcing you to pay for schools, national parks, police, courts, roads - and now basic human rights.
Why not migrate to Antarctica?
Tissue?
Forced to be compassionate huh? Poor thing.
Ohhhh.... you know, it comes along with several other services which a civilised country offers to its communities, for everybody, at taxpayer's expense. Like Pavements, Roads, Police, Fire Brigades, Coastguard, Defence, Education..... etc. etc. Look, the list is fairly lengthy. It's all about 'Caring for all in the Community'.I'm curious where you dreamed up this concept that healthcare is a right, and furthermore, that taxpayers are required to foot the bill.
Just wondering how govt services equates to forced purchases from a private entity. Ie; private insurance companies by which its somehow designated as being a tax to qualify as legal under the constution.
Can't think of any government services that run in a similar pattern. Can you?
You don't know what you're talking about! Honest!I have no problems with paying to build roads, foster community services like police and fire, etc. Necessary things. Nobody that I know of supports anarchy. obamacare rations care- that is how it's costs are controlled. In communist and socialist countries, they may have super cheap and/or free care, but they also have extremely long wait times and questionable doctors. There's a reason people around the world come to the US for healthcare, we don't have doctors like House attending them!
Could it be that they wanted to make your country a better land for all?
Ohhhh.... you know, it comes along with several other services which a civilised country offers to its communities, for everybody, at taxpayer's expense. Like Pavements, Roads, Police, Fire Brigades, Coastguard, Defence, Education..... etc. etc. Look, the list is fairly lengthy. It's all about 'Caring for all in the Community'.
But if you want to go down the route of 'Rich can have it, Poor can shove it', Hell, just you carry on hanging around in the Dark Ages.
Hyperbole at this best!Yea they're so amazing that everyone who is able, comes to the US for their healthcare.
Thanks for the first sentences. Appreciated.Good for your wife. Really. But nothing is absolutely free; in other words someone is footing the bill for your "free care."
Well your countyfolk disagree, because he has been Presidenmt tfor two whole terms (soon).And I take offense for you suggesting that the foreigner, obama, is my President. Normally when people say that it speaks of hyper-partisanship. But in this case, I truly believe that he is trying to dismantle America, so by denouncing him, I am putting my country first.
But the Preamble establishes the precedent. Secondly, we pass laws regularly that are nowhere found n the BoR. Thirdly, the ACA does not in any way violate either the BoR nor the Constitution as a whole.The preamble of the Constitution is an introduction of the works in it's text. No court will interpret anything contained in the preamble as granting a right that's not specifically contained in the Bill of Rights.
And which politician or political party is doing better?Look, the era of" hope and change" is clearly over, and millions of people have buyer's remorse after voting for the snake oil salesman. In 2008 and 2012, soaring rhetoric and looking "cool" were just as good as actual Presidential qualifications.
The government does not pay for abortion under federal law.If I'm not mistaken, we were discussing the disaster known as Obama don't care. The government forces Christian organizations to pay for contraceptives. I think if it is against their belief system, I.e. abortion, they shouldn't be required to pay for it.
Nobody was talking about necessary federal services.
What I can't understand is how you supposedly reconcile this position with being a Christian? The ACA is helping millions of Americans, and my only regret is that it didn't go far enough to cover all Americans. Jesus taught that compassion and justice for others was terribly important, and yet I see none of that being reflected in your posts.Well, as I have stated prior, healthcare is no right. It is not enshrined in the Constitution, as a right. This socialist pozi scheme is Unconstitutional and deplorable.