YmirGF
Bodhisattva in Recovery
Take a deep breath and calm down.WHAT???!
You have to remember that the VAST majority of Christians do not believe the Bible is the literal, word of God, in the way the VAST majority of Muslims believe the Qur'an is literally written by God. The Bible is only inspired by God and was written by men. It is when Muslims (and some kooky literalistic Christians) look at the Bible as being the literal word of God that problems arise.then why would god says something wrong Huh?
Why should we look at this doubtful piece dating from the 16th century?and you didn't check the bernaba gospel and i am sure you didn't...
SOURCEThis Gospel is considered by the majority of academics, including Christians and some Muslims (such as Abbas el-Akkad) to be late and pseudepigraphical;[1] however, some academics suggest that it may contain some remnants of an earlier apocryphal work (perhaps Gnostic[2], Ebionite[3] or Diatessaronic[4]), edited to conform to Islam. Some Muslims consider the surviving versions as transmitting a suppressed apostolic original. Some Islamic organizations cite it in support of the Islamic view of Jesus.
For the record, pseudepigraphical means:
Sourcepseud·e·pig·ra·pha [soo-duh-pig-ruh-fuh]
noun (used with a plural verb)
certain writings (other than the canonical books and the Apocrypha) professing to be Biblical in character.
Origin:
1685–95; < Neo-Latin < Greek, neuter plural of pseudepíigraphos falsely inscribed, bearing a false title. See pseud-, epigraph, -ous
Last edited: