Bisexuality Confirmed!

[Alceste]

Like you?

I have seen you do nothing more then claim its bigotry and discrimination.

Plus you talk as if its the whole church lol Still that is not the topic. Topic is bisexuality. Which is immoral.

Come up with a real argument.

Not discriminating against people based on their sexual orientation needs no argument. It is obviously right. Do we need an argument to keep us from discriminating based on race, disability, age or gender? No.

Only people who are in the wrong, like you and your church, need lengthy rationalizations to justify themselves.

 

[Alceste]

So we have to pretend you are not bigoted when you cannot come up with one secular argument against homosexuality, but you can call people who are racist "bigots"? What a hypocrite! What ********!

No, we don't have to pretend JE is not a bigot. I don't know about you, but I'm going to go ahead and call a spade a spade.

 

[JacobEzra.]

In other words, as long as queers know our place, everything should be just fine. No?

Well I don't agree with your thinking.

They are humanbeings.Homosexual marriage is just not approved

 

[Me Myself]

Well I don't agree with your thinking.

They are humanbeings.Homosexual marriage is just not approved

One single tiny whinny frail attempt of something that may resemble an actual argument as on why bisexuality is moraly wrong without naming the book were donkeys talk and saints send bears to kill little children.

Is that too much to ask?

 

[JacobEzra.]

Not discriminating against people based on their sexual orientation needs no argument. It is obviously right. Do we need an argument to keep us from discriminating based on race, disability, age or gender? No.

Only people who are in the wrong, like you and your church, need lengthy rationalizations to justify themselves.

Good thing, there is no discrimination

 

[Acim]

But being charitable and loving, does not mean changing our political stance on the issue of marriage.

Just realize though for some spiritual people, you are setting this up as only political and not something that is 'from Spirit.'

For if you did, you would realize from 1 Corinthians 7: 8-9 (and rest of that chapter) how marriage is to be viewed:

Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. 9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

With this in mind, it is I would say not very Christ-like to do unto another as you would not have done to yourself. IOW, to say we must marry for if we don't we are engaging in sexual immorality, but they must not marry for they are engaged in sexual immorality. If we simply turned this around and law of the land is it is good and decent for homosexuals to marry and when they do their bonding is sanctified in Spirit, but heterosexuals who appear to be highly sexually active must never be allowed to marry for they continue to engage in sinful behavior (burning with passion). If that were the scene, I would think a 'good Christian' would see wisdom in the 1 Corinthians passage and do everything in their (political) power to ensure marriage is made available for all consenting adults, otherwise the Christian community is essentially being led by the devil to justify an untenable position.

 

[JacobEzra.]

One single tiny whinny frail attempt of something that may resemble an actual argument as on why bisexuality is moraly wrong without naming the book were donkeys talk and saints send bears to kill little children.

Is that too much to ask?

Spreads Aids. Anal sex is unnatural. Its decadent.

 

[waitasec]

Again, how does this verse mean to accept homosexual marriage? It doesn't

it means give what is asked of you...set your wants/needs aside. there is absolutely no passages in luke 6 that justifies taking dominion over unbelievers in lays out how a christian should act towards those who are of the world...

. And how is it talking about an "enemy"? We have no enemies, except the evil one.

so jesus is saying give the devil want he is asking for?

And again, how does acting meek, mean accepting homosexual marriage?

by being patient with those who are of the world, not by enforcing gods will.
didn't he give all of us free will, isn't that our inalienable right? who is the church to be taking that away from anyone...the church is to be a beacon of gods love and thus far it is a beacon of discrimination and control...a very telling sign of fear and insecurity and not very christ like if you ask me...why do you think being a christian is supposed to be easy?
you are not setting yourself apart from anyone else who is insecure..you are acting out in panic because you want to control other people...

 

[JacobEzra.]

Just realize though for some spiritual people, you are setting this up as only political and not something that is 'from Spirit.'

For if you did, you would realize from 1 Corinthians 7: 8-9 (and rest of that chapter) how marriage is to be viewed:

Now to the unmarried and the widows I say: It is good for them to stay unmarried, as I do. 9 But if they cannot control themselves, they should marry, for it is better to marry than to burn with passion.

With this in mind, it is I would say not very Christ-like to do unto another as you would not have done to yourself. IOW, to say we must marry for if we don't we are engaging in sexual immorality, but they must not marry for they are engaged in sexual immorality. If we simply turned this around and law of the land is it is good and decent for homosexuals to marry and when they do their bonding is sanctified in Spirit, but heterosexuals who appear to be highly sexually active must never be allowed to marry for they continue to engage in sinful behavior (burning with passion). If that were the scene, I would think a 'good Christian' would see wisdom in the 1 Corinthians passage and do everything in their (political) power to ensure marriage is made available for all consenting adults, otherwise the Christian community is essentially being led by the devil to justify an untenable position.

How can something like homosexuality be sanctified? It can not. Never once in the bible is homosexuality spoken as an okay and moral thing.

 

[Me Myself]

How can something like homosexuality be sanctified? It can not. Never once in the bible is homosexuality spoken as an okay and moral thing.

One single tiny whinny frail attempt of something that may resemble an actual argument as on why bisexuality is moraly wrong without naming the book were donkeys talk and saints send bears to kill little children.

Is that too much to ask?

 

[Awoon]

"homosexuality," not a word in the Bible, but is described as an Unclean act according the cultures of the times. The act does not mean "sinful" just unclean.

Eating shellfish, rabbits, certain birds, fish without scales carry the same "uncleanness" labels. They are abominations.

Today's meaning of sin (according to religions and churches) are cultic in their meanings.

So whatever cult anyone is involved with will have their rules to be followed by their own cultists.

If they don't follow the rules then the punishment is anathema, excommunication , cutting off limbs and even death.

 

[JacobEzra.]

it means give what is asked of you...set your wants/needs aside. there is absolutely no passages in luke 6 that justifies taking dominion over unbelievers in lays out how a christian should act towards those who are of the world...

no where does it say to support sin.

so jesus is saying give the devil want he is asking for?

by being patient with those who are of the world, not by enforcing gods will.
didn't he give all of us free will, isn't that our inalienable right? who is the church to be taking that away from anyone...the church is to be a beacon of gods love and thus far it is a beacon of discrimination and control...a very telling sign of fear and insecurity and not very christ like if you ask me...why do you think being a christian is supposed to be easy?
you are not setting yourself apart from anyone else who is insecure..you are acting out in panic because you want to control other people...

Again....

 

[waitasec]

Spreads Aids. Anal sex is unnatural. Its decadent.

nice straw man...
any sex can do that...
tell me where did aids come from?
how did std's begin? do you think it was because of having multiple human partners?
think again captain...

 

[Alceste]

Well I don't agree with your thinking.

They are humanbeings.Homosexual marriage is just not approved

You are aware, are you not, that many people don't belong to your church? Why do you feel they should have to obey your religious commandments?

 

[waitasec]

no where does it say to support sin.

it's not for you to judge now is it?

33 And if you do good to those who are good to you, what credit is that to you? Even sinners do that....

We have no enemies, except the evil one.

35 But love your enemies, do good to them, and lend to them without expecting to get anything back...
who is he talking about then?

Again....

exactly you should be ashamed...

 

[JacobEzra.]

nice straw man...
any sex can do that...
tell me where did aids come from?
how did std's begin? do you think it was because of having multiple human partners?
think again captain...

lol :sarcastic

I said more then that.

Transmission Category

Male-to-male sexual contact 23,846 - 23,846

Basic Statistics | Statistics and Surveillance | Topics | CDC HIV/AIDS

Statistics say most people with Aids are thous who contracted it through male to male sexual contact

 

[Alceste]

Spreads Aids. Anal sex is unnatural. Its decadent.

Heterosexual people have anal sex and some gays don't (they prefer oral). So is it just people who have anal sex who should bear the brunt of your bigoted attitudes?

 

[Darkness]

Spreads Aids. Anal sex is unnatural. Its decadent.

Lesbians are just dandy in your book then? Since it is immoral because it spreads disease, then lesbian sex, which is less likely to spread disease than heterosexual sex, is more moral than heterosexual sex. Next argument.

 

[Alceste]

Good thing, there is no discrimination

You've got to be kidding. Denying equal civil rights to a group based on factors not of their choosing is the very definition of discrimination, and your incredibly ignorant comment about AIDS shows pure bigotry is your true motive.

 

[Me Myself]

Spreads Aids. Anal sex is unnatural. Its decadent.

Ah! wannabe argument! okay, that´s the headtitle!

Aids: don´t need to happen if these two married homos are in an exclusive relaitonship, which would be a point pro marriage for them

Anal sex is unnatural Like circumsicion?

Its decadent You´ll need further elaboration.