sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Basic textual criticism.And you know the way it is...by what means?
No, it doesn't. It theologically explores our beginnings.And Chapter Two does not describe a science experiment?
Yes it does.
Implicitly, yes.And Genesis makes note of this?
No, it simply attempts to shove it in a closet and pretend that it doesn't exist.In spite of your nay saying.....my version takes away the nay saying.
Genesis has nothing to do with either evolution or science.You can have your belief in evolution and your Genesis....Chapter One
You can have your science and your Genesis....Chapter Two.
So... you call the first person to apprehend God "Human?"And again...as you pick any version of God's first interaction with Man....
someone had to be first.
I call him Adam.
Do you think that person would have been Cro Magnon or Neanderthal? Homo Erectus, or Homo Sapiens?