@ TheKnight
You are not just wrong on this topic, but potentially
dangerously wrong.
Depression, as is evidence by treatments that cure depression, is the result of a lack of purposeful understanding or deliberate focus in a person's life. In essence, it comes from a mindset in which a person does not value what they have in life for it's true value. It can also come from a sense of purposelessness.
This is so wrong that I really, truly, and genuinely hope you have never dispensed this advice to any person with suffering from a real condition. If this were true then why is it that there biological differences between those with the condition and those without? Some research has shown that the
pituitary gland, the
hippocampus,
cortical volume, etc.
It does not mean that you have chemical imbalances in the brain. Saying that depression is the direct result of chemical imbalance is almost as bad as saying it's the result of an evil spirit.
Do red pimples cause you to have the measles? No, it is a symptom.
Does a non-fading rash cause you to have meningitis? No it is a symptom.
Does a reduction in serotonin cause you to have clinical depression? No, it is a symptom.
As someone who has been involved in the successful treatment of over 100 depressed souls, I can honestly say that you are in your conclusion that my statements above are incorrect.
So, according to you, the act of simply feeling down is depression? This is so wrong it is almost scary.
Depression stems from perspective on life. Change the perspective to a more fitting one, and depression is easy to combat.
So a ‘perspective in life’ can alter one’s brain chemistry and neurological development to the point where MRI’s can detect significant biological differences? Good luck selling that idea.
My experience tells me that it's different from person to person.
It should be noted that it appears from your comments that your experience has been badly discredited by your apparently inability to distinguish between ‘the blues’ and an actual case of clinical depression.
My point was that I don't think it is a mental illness (or an evil spirit for that matter).
And the vast body of relevant research completely and utterly shows you to be false on this.
The vast majority of depressed people do not have some sort of chemical imbalance that makes them depressed.
If those people do not have the symptoms of depression then they are not suffering from depression. Unless of course you cannot differentiate between ‘the blues’ and depression.
The fact that there is little to no evidence that depression is the result of chemical imbalance in the brain.
There is no evidence whatsoever that measles is the result of red pimples. There is no evidence whatsoever that a non-fading rash causes meningitis. And, in the same vein of recognising that diseases cause symptoms and not the other way about, there is no evidence whatsoever that chemical imbalances cause depression. How can you speak with such authority on this issue when you are utterly incapable of understanding the difference between a cause and a symptom?
We don't know enough about the brain to know what the manifestations would be of certain chemical changes within it. We thought we did, but more recent experiments have changed that thinking. The waters are much more murky now with recent experimentation (granted, not done on humans, but on animals).
Now this is complete and utter bollox being told by a person who hasn’t got the first clue about what he is talking about. New MRI technology is allowing researches to detect even more of the biological differences that underlie these conditions – anyone claiming otherwise is simply ignoring the relevant medical literature and talking out of their cake-hole.
Perhaps the biggest evidence is that medication usually doesn't help fight the problem, but the symptoms.
Ermm…most medication fights the symptoms. Flu medicine treats the symptoms for example. With the exception of anti-virals and antibiotics, pretty much most medicine is symptom orientated.
If we knew that the problem itself was chemical imbalance then depression should be curable by medication. It isn't and that is perhaps the greatest evidence for my claim.
This is great evidence that you don’t know what you are talking about. To take an example, someone with clinical depression might be experiencing suicidal tendencies (not uncommon unfortunately). In such a case medication to improve mood (such as by raising serotonin for example) might be prescribed. The reason for this should be obvious – without such medication the patient could likely cause harm to themselves. This is typical of the sort of treatment someone with this condition might receive. Sometimes the only thing that can be done for people is to treat symptoms. This isn’t uncommon in the field of medicine, diabetes being an example.
That could be explained by the Placebo affect.
Lrn2DoubleBlind
Lrn2DoubleBlind
Lrn2DoubleBlind
I am fairly certain, however, that a person could be cured of their depression without medication.
Based upon nothing more than gut-feeling I suspect.
I know, from involvement in the field of psychology, that it does.
I don’t suppose you could point to some peer-reviewed research for that? I won’t be holding my breath though.
The bottom line is that mental illnesses are demonstrable conditions, and in some cases required treatment. You misrepresenting the science on this is extremely irresponsible and potentially dangerous for any poor-sods who mistake your ignorant ramblings for medical advice. I’m not one bit surprise that Storm was ****** at your proclamation that depression was a ‘
lack of purposeful understanding or deliberate focus in a person's life’.
The information you are dispensing is simply
wrong and potentially
dangerous.